Impact of modification to DSM-5 criterion A for hypomania/mania in newly diagnosed bipolar patients: findings from the prospective BIO study.

Activity Bipolar disorder Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Version IV (DSM-IV) Energy Irritability Mood The International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10) The International Classification of Diseases 11 (ICD-11)

Journal

International journal of bipolar disorders
ISSN: 2194-7511
Titre abrégé: Int J Bipolar Disord
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101622983

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 May 2021
Historique:
received: 26 10 2020
accepted: 24 12 2020
entrez: 3 5 2021
pubmed: 4 5 2021
medline: 4 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

DSM-IV states that criterion A for diagnosing hypomania/mania is mood change. The revised DSM-5 now states that increased energy or activity must be present alongside mood changes to diagnose hypomania/mania, thus raising energy/activity to criterion A. We set out to investigate how the change in criterion A affects the diagnosis of hypomanic/manic visits in patients with a newly diagnosed bipolar disorder. In this prospective cohort study, 373 patients were included (median age = 32; IQR, 27-40). Women constituted 66% (n = 245) of the cohort and 68% of the cohort (n = 253) met criteria for bipolar type II, the remaining patients were diagnosed bipolar type I. Median number of contributed visits was 2 per subject (IQR, 1-3) and median follow-up time was 3 years (IQR, 2-4). During follow-up, 127 patients had at least one visit with fulfilled DSM-IV criterion A. Applying DSM-5 criterion A reduced the number of patients experiencing a hypomanic/manic visit by 62% at baseline and by 50% during longitudinal follow-up, compared with DSM-IV criterion A. Fulfilling DSM-5 criterion A during follow-up was associated with higher modified young mania rating scale score (OR = 1.51, CL [1.34, 1.71], p < 0.0001) and increased number of visits contributed (OR = 1.86, CL [1.52, 2.29], p < 0.0001). Applying the stricter DSM-5 criterion A in a cohort of newly diagnosed bipolar patients reduced the number of patients experiencing a hypomanic/manic visit substantially, and was associated with higher overall young mania rating scale scores, compared with DSM-IV criterion A. Consequently, fewer hypomanic/manic visits may be detected in newly diagnosed bipolar patients with applied DSM-5 criterion A, and the upcoming ICD-11, which may possibly result in longer diagnostic delay of BD as compared with the DSM-IV.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
DSM-IV states that criterion A for diagnosing hypomania/mania is mood change. The revised DSM-5 now states that increased energy or activity must be present alongside mood changes to diagnose hypomania/mania, thus raising energy/activity to criterion A. We set out to investigate how the change in criterion A affects the diagnosis of hypomanic/manic visits in patients with a newly diagnosed bipolar disorder.
RESULTS RESULTS
In this prospective cohort study, 373 patients were included (median age = 32; IQR, 27-40). Women constituted 66% (n = 245) of the cohort and 68% of the cohort (n = 253) met criteria for bipolar type II, the remaining patients were diagnosed bipolar type I. Median number of contributed visits was 2 per subject (IQR, 1-3) and median follow-up time was 3 years (IQR, 2-4). During follow-up, 127 patients had at least one visit with fulfilled DSM-IV criterion A. Applying DSM-5 criterion A reduced the number of patients experiencing a hypomanic/manic visit by 62% at baseline and by 50% during longitudinal follow-up, compared with DSM-IV criterion A. Fulfilling DSM-5 criterion A during follow-up was associated with higher modified young mania rating scale score (OR = 1.51, CL [1.34, 1.71], p < 0.0001) and increased number of visits contributed (OR = 1.86, CL [1.52, 2.29], p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Applying the stricter DSM-5 criterion A in a cohort of newly diagnosed bipolar patients reduced the number of patients experiencing a hypomanic/manic visit substantially, and was associated with higher overall young mania rating scale scores, compared with DSM-IV criterion A. Consequently, fewer hypomanic/manic visits may be detected in newly diagnosed bipolar patients with applied DSM-5 criterion A, and the upcoming ICD-11, which may possibly result in longer diagnostic delay of BD as compared with the DSM-IV.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33937949
doi: 10.1186/s40345-020-00219-9
pii: 10.1186/s40345-020-00219-9
pmc: PMC8089066
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

14

Références

Bipolar Disord. 2019 Mar;21(2):168-169
pubmed: 30475429
Br J Psychiatry. 1978 Nov;133:429-35
pubmed: 728692
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 1;174(1):70-76
pubmed: 27523498
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-62
pubmed: 14399272
Can J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;62(4):247-258
pubmed: 27462036
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e015462
pubmed: 28645967
J Clin Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 29;80(6):
pubmed: 31665571
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 1;174(8):803
pubmed: 28760020
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;202(3):212-9
pubmed: 23349295
Bipolar Disord. 2007 Jun;9(4):386-93
pubmed: 17547585
Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;205(3):214-20
pubmed: 25012681

Auteurs

Mette U Fredskild (MU)

Copenhagen Affective Disorders Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Department O, 6233, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Sharleny Stanislaus (S)

Copenhagen Affective Disorders Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Department O, 6233, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Klara Coello (K)

Copenhagen Affective Disorders Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Department O, 6233, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Sigurd A Melbye (SA)

Copenhagen Affective Disorders Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Department O, 6233, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Hanne Lie Kjærstad (HL)

Copenhagen Affective Disorders Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Department O, 6233, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Kimie Stefanie Ormstrup Sletved (KSO)

Copenhagen Affective Disorders Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Department O, 6233, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Trisha Suppes (T)

Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Maj Vinberg (M)

Copenhagen Affective Disorders Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Department O, 6233, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatric Centre North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark.

Lars Vedel Kessing (LV)

Copenhagen Affective Disorders Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Department O, 6233, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. lars.vedel.kessing@regionh.dk.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. lars.vedel.kessing@regionh.dk.

Classifications MeSH