Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation versus autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for chondral defects of the talus: a systematic review.
AMIC
chondral defect
mACI
talus
Journal
British medical bulletin
ISSN: 1471-8391
Titre abrégé: Br Med Bull
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376542
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 06 2021
10 06 2021
Historique:
accepted:
23
02
2021
pubmed:
4
5
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
entrez:
3
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Chondral defects of the talus are common and their treatment is challenging. Recent published literatures. Membrane-induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (mACI) and Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) have been proposed as management for chondral defects of the talus. It is debated whether AMIC provides greater outcomes compared to mACI for chondral regeneration. Several clinical studies showed controversial results, and the best treatment has not yet been clarified. To investigate whether AMIC provide superior outcomes than mACI at midterm follow-up. AMIC exhibits similar clinical results to mACI. However, AMIC involves one single surgical procedure, no articular cartilage harvest and hence no morbidity from it, no need for chondrocyte expansion in a separate laboratory setting. For these reasons, AMIC may be preferred to mACI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33940611
pii: 6261917
doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldab008
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
144-154Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.