Prevalence of conduct problems and social risk factors in ethnically diverse inner-city schools.

Adolescence Conduct problems Ethnicity London Parental bonding Prevalence Racism Risk factors Troublesome friends

Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 05 2021
Historique:
received: 29 05 2020
accepted: 13 04 2021
entrez: 4 5 2021
pubmed: 5 5 2021
medline: 25 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In the UK, around 5% of 11-16-year olds experience conduct problems of clinical importance. However, there are limited data on prevalence of conduct problems by ethnic group, and how putative social risk factors may explain any variations in prevalence. This study has two main aims: (1) to estimate the prevalence and nature of conduct problems overall, and by ethnic group and gender, among adolescents in diverse inner-city London schools; (2) to assess the extent to which putative risk factors - racial discrimination, socioeconomic status, parental control, and troublesome friends - explain any observed differences in prevalence of conduct problems between ethnic groups. This study uses baseline data from REACH, an accelerated cohort study of adolescent mental health in inner-city London. Self-report questionnaire data were collected on conduct problems and a range of distinct putative social risk factors (including racial discrimination, free school meals, troublesome friends, and parental care and control). A total of 4353 pupils, 51% girls, aged 11-14 participated. We estimated prevalence of conduct problems and used multilevel logistic regression to examine differences by ethnicity and gender and associations with putative risk factors. Prevalence of conduct problems in inner-city schools was around three times higher than reported in national studies (i.e., 16% [95%CI: 15·2-17·5] vs. 5% [95%CI 4·6-5·9]). Compared with overall prevalence, conduct problems were lower among Indian/Pakistani/Bangladeshi (RR: 0.53 [95% CI:0.31-0.87]) and white British (RR: 0.65 [0.51-0.82]) groups, and higher among black Caribbean (RR: 1.39 [95%CI:1.19-1.62]) and mixed white and black (RR: 1.29 [95% CI: 1.02-1.60]) groups. Risk of conduct problems was higher among those who were exposed to racial discrimination compared with those who were not (RR: 1.95 [95% CI: 1.59-2.31]). Conduct problems are markedly more common in inner-city schools, and variations in the prevalence of conduct problems are, to some extent, rooted in modifiable social contexts and experiences, such as experiences of racial discrimination.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
In the UK, around 5% of 11-16-year olds experience conduct problems of clinical importance. However, there are limited data on prevalence of conduct problems by ethnic group, and how putative social risk factors may explain any variations in prevalence. This study has two main aims: (1) to estimate the prevalence and nature of conduct problems overall, and by ethnic group and gender, among adolescents in diverse inner-city London schools; (2) to assess the extent to which putative risk factors - racial discrimination, socioeconomic status, parental control, and troublesome friends - explain any observed differences in prevalence of conduct problems between ethnic groups.
METHODS
This study uses baseline data from REACH, an accelerated cohort study of adolescent mental health in inner-city London. Self-report questionnaire data were collected on conduct problems and a range of distinct putative social risk factors (including racial discrimination, free school meals, troublesome friends, and parental care and control). A total of 4353 pupils, 51% girls, aged 11-14 participated. We estimated prevalence of conduct problems and used multilevel logistic regression to examine differences by ethnicity and gender and associations with putative risk factors.
RESULTS
Prevalence of conduct problems in inner-city schools was around three times higher than reported in national studies (i.e., 16% [95%CI: 15·2-17·5] vs. 5% [95%CI 4·6-5·9]). Compared with overall prevalence, conduct problems were lower among Indian/Pakistani/Bangladeshi (RR: 0.53 [95% CI:0.31-0.87]) and white British (RR: 0.65 [0.51-0.82]) groups, and higher among black Caribbean (RR: 1.39 [95%CI:1.19-1.62]) and mixed white and black (RR: 1.29 [95% CI: 1.02-1.60]) groups. Risk of conduct problems was higher among those who were exposed to racial discrimination compared with those who were not (RR: 1.95 [95% CI: 1.59-2.31]).
CONCLUSIONS
Conduct problems are markedly more common in inner-city schools, and variations in the prevalence of conduct problems are, to some extent, rooted in modifiable social contexts and experiences, such as experiences of racial discrimination.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33941137
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10834-5
pii: 10.1186/s12889-021-10834-5
pmc: PMC8091508
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

849

Subventions

Organisme : H2020 European Research Council
ID : REACH 648837
Organisme : Economic and Social Research Council
ID : ES/S012567/1

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Références

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000 Jul;41(5):645-55
pubmed: 10946756
Dev Psychol. 2017 May;53(5):873-932
pubmed: 28459276
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e48012
pubmed: 23251330
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2009 Jun;30(3):255-63
pubmed: 19525720
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):1173-88
pubmed: 25861790
Child Care Health Dev. 2012 Sep;38(5):611-28
pubmed: 22372737
Dev Sci. 2017 Mar;20(2):
pubmed: 26490166
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Nov;40(11):1337-45
pubmed: 11699809
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Oct;95:115-27
pubmed: 23312306
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;45(3):609-21
pubmed: 15055379
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Feb 8;:
pubmed: 33558428
Dev Psychopathol. 2005 Winter;17(1):145-65
pubmed: 15971764
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;42(9):759-69
pubmed: 17603738
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Jan;103(1):61-64
pubmed: 26912571
BMC Public Health. 2008 Jul 25;8:258
pubmed: 18655701
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;12(1):1-8
pubmed: 12601558
Child Care Health Dev. 2010 Sep;36(5):630-8
pubmed: 20645993
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;60(9):874-82
pubmed: 17689803
BMJ. 2009 Jan 08;338:a2981
pubmed: 19131382
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;27(10):1239-1260
pubmed: 28983792
Dev Psychopathol. 2008 Spring;20(2):673-716
pubmed: 18423100
Ethn Health. 2012;17(1-2):71-87
pubmed: 22332834
Child Dev. 2006 Sep-Oct;77(5):1170-89
pubmed: 16999791
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Jan;45(1):156-71
pubmed: 25292150
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 May;51(5):689-701
pubmed: 26875153

Auteurs

Rachel Blakey (R)

Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

Craig Morgan (C)

Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. craig.morgan@kcl.ac.uk.
ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK. craig.morgan@kcl.ac.uk.

Charlotte Gayer-Anderson (C)

Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

Sam Davis (S)

Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

Stephanie Beards (S)

Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Seeromanie Harding (S)

Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, Stand, WC2R 2LS, UK.

Vanessa Pinfold (V)

The McPin Foundation, 7-14 Great Dover Street, London, SE1 4YR, UK.

Kamaldeep Bhui (K)

Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts & The London, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square Campus, Old Anatomy Building, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.

Gemma Knowles (G)

Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

Essi Viding (E)

Developmental Risk and Resilience Unit, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH