Comparison of immunohistochemistry and gene expression profiling subtyping for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the phase III clinical trial of R-CHOP ± ibrutinib.
Adenine
/ administration & dosage
Adult
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
B-Lymphocytes
/ chemistry
Cyclophosphamide
/ administration & dosage
Doxorubicin
/ administration & dosage
Gene Expression Profiling
Germinal Center
/ pathology
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse
/ classification
Middle Aged
Neoplastic Stem Cells
/ chemistry
Piperidines
/ administration & dosage
Prednisone
/ administration & dosage
Prognosis
Progression-Free Survival
Rituximab
/ administration & dosage
Treatment Outcome
Vincristine
/ administration & dosage
IHC
concordance
diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
gene expression profiling
subtyping
Journal
British journal of haematology
ISSN: 1365-2141
Titre abrégé: Br J Haematol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372544
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
revised:
05
03
2021
received:
24
12
2020
accepted:
11
03
2021
pubmed:
5
5
2021
medline:
17
12
2021
entrez:
4
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We assessed the concordance between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and gene expression profiling (GEP) for determining diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell of origin (COO) in the phase III PHOENIX trial of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) with or without ibrutinib. Among 910 of 1114 screened patients with non-germinal centre B cell-like (non-GCB) DLBCL by IHC, the concordance with GEP for non-GCB calls was 82·7%, with 691 (75·9%) identified as activated B cell-like (ABC), and 62 (6·8%) as unclassified. Among 746 of 837 enrolled patients with verified non-GCB DLBCL by IHC, the concordance with GEP was 82·8%, with 567 (76·0%) identified as ABC and 51 (6·8%) unclassified; survival outcomes were similar regardless of COO or treatment, whereas among patients with ABC DLBCL aged <60 years, the overall and event-free survival were substantially better with ibrutinib versus placebo plus R-CHOP [hazard ratio (HR) 0·365, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·147-0·909, P = 0·0305; HR 0·561, 95% CI 0·326-0·967, P = 0·0348, respectively]. IHC and GEP showed high concordance and consistent survival outcomes among tested patients, indicating centralised IHC may be used to enrich populations for response to ibrutinib plus R-CHOP.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33942292
doi: 10.1111/bjh.17450
pmc: PMC9969735
mid: NIHMS1869167
doi:
Substances chimiques
Piperidines
0
ibrutinib
1X70OSD4VX
Rituximab
4F4X42SYQ6
Vincristine
5J49Q6B70F
Doxorubicin
80168379AG
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Adenine
JAC85A2161
Prednisone
VB0R961HZT
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
83-91Subventions
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : ZIA BC010728
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
Références
Nat Med. 2018 May;24(5):679-690
pubmed: 29713087
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 12;378(15):1396-1407
pubmed: 29641966
Cancer Cell. 2020 Apr 13;37(4):551-568.e14
pubmed: 32289277
Blood. 2014 Feb 20;123(8):1214-7
pubmed: 24398326
Swiss Med Wkly. 2013 Apr 18;143:w13748
pubmed: 23740154
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Dec 15;19(24):6686-95
pubmed: 24122791
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015;:e458-66
pubmed: 25993210
Nature. 2000 Feb 3;403(6769):503-11
pubmed: 10676951
Blood. 2015 Jan 1;125(1):22-32
pubmed: 25499448
N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 27;359(22):2313-23
pubmed: 19038878
Nat Med. 2015 Aug;21(8):922-6
pubmed: 26193343
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 20;33(3):251-7
pubmed: 25135992
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Jun 1;17(11):3727-32
pubmed: 21364035
Blood. 2004 Jan 1;103(1):275-82
pubmed: 14504078
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 20;37(15):1285-1295
pubmed: 30901302