Phase I Trial of Cemiplimab, Radiotherapy, Cyclophosphamide, and Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Cyclophosphamide
/ therapeutic use
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
Granulocytes
Head and Neck Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Humans
Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
/ drug therapy
Cemiplimab
Head and neck
Radiotherapy
Journal
The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
received:
31
03
2021
accepted:
26
04
2021
pubmed:
5
5
2021
medline:
29
9
2021
entrez:
4
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cemiplimab in combination with radiation therapy, cyclophosphamide, and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor did not demonstrate efficacy above what can be achieved with other PD-1 inhibitor monotherapies in patients with refractory and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The safety profile of cemiplimab combination therapy was consistent with previously reported safety profiles of cemiplimab monotherapy. No new safety signal was observed. Refractory and metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) generally does not respond to PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy. Cemiplimab is a human anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody. An expansion cohort enrolled patients with R/M HNSCC in a phase I study combining cemiplimab plus radiation therapy (RT), cyclophosphamide, and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Patients with R/M HNSCC refractory to at least first-line therapy and for whom palliative RT is clinically indicated received cemiplimab plus RT, cyclophosphamide, and GM-CSF. The co-primary objectives were the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of cemiplimab plus RT, cyclophosphamide, and GM-CSF in 15 patients with R/M HNSCC. Fifteen patients were enrolled. Patients discontinued treatment due to progression of disease. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were fatigue (40.0%), constipation (26.7%), and asthenia, dyspnea, maculo-papular rash, and pneumonia (each 20%). The only grade ≥3 TEAE that occurred in two patients was pneumonia (13.3%). By investigator assessment, there was one partial response (6.7%); disease control rate was 40.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.3-67.7; five patients with stable disease); seven patients had progressive disease, and two were not evaluable. Median progression-free survival by investigator assessment was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.7-4.7). The regimen demonstrated tolerability but not efficacy above that which can be achieved with anti-PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy for R/M HNSCC.
Sections du résumé
LESSONS LEARNED
Cemiplimab in combination with radiation therapy, cyclophosphamide, and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor did not demonstrate efficacy above what can be achieved with other PD-1 inhibitor monotherapies in patients with refractory and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The safety profile of cemiplimab combination therapy was consistent with previously reported safety profiles of cemiplimab monotherapy. No new safety signal was observed.
BACKGROUND
Refractory and metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) generally does not respond to PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy. Cemiplimab is a human anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody. An expansion cohort enrolled patients with R/M HNSCC in a phase I study combining cemiplimab plus radiation therapy (RT), cyclophosphamide, and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF).
METHODS
Patients with R/M HNSCC refractory to at least first-line therapy and for whom palliative RT is clinically indicated received cemiplimab plus RT, cyclophosphamide, and GM-CSF. The co-primary objectives were the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of cemiplimab plus RT, cyclophosphamide, and GM-CSF in 15 patients with R/M HNSCC.
RESULTS
Fifteen patients were enrolled. Patients discontinued treatment due to progression of disease. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were fatigue (40.0%), constipation (26.7%), and asthenia, dyspnea, maculo-papular rash, and pneumonia (each 20%). The only grade ≥3 TEAE that occurred in two patients was pneumonia (13.3%). By investigator assessment, there was one partial response (6.7%); disease control rate was 40.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.3-67.7; five patients with stable disease); seven patients had progressive disease, and two were not evaluable. Median progression-free survival by investigator assessment was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.7-4.7).
CONCLUSION
The regimen demonstrated tolerability but not efficacy above that which can be achieved with anti-PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy for R/M HNSCC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33942954
doi: 10.1002/onco.13810
pmc: PMC8417861
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
cemiplimab
6QVL057INT
Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
81627-83-0
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
83869-56-1
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02383212']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1508-e1513Informations de copyright
© AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1856-1867
pubmed: 27718784
Cancer Res. 2012 Jul 15;72(14):3439-44
pubmed: 22761338
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86
pubmed: 25220842
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan 1;39(1):30-37
pubmed: 32822275
Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2009 Feb;11(1):37-42
pubmed: 19169958
J Clin Invest. 2014 Feb;124(2):687-95
pubmed: 24382348
Lancet. 2019 Nov 23;394(10212):1915-1928
pubmed: 31679945
Oncoimmunology. 2012 Sep 1;1(6):979-981
pubmed: 23162778
Blood. 2009 Aug 13;114(7):1289-98
pubmed: 19436055
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 6;350(19):1945-52
pubmed: 15128894
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Jul;92(1):4-14
pubmed: 19446902
Mol Immunol. 2019 Jun;110:13-23
pubmed: 29273394
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014 Jun;73(6):1227-39
pubmed: 24714973
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jul;16(7):795-803
pubmed: 26095785
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Dec 15;18(24):6668-78
pubmed: 23048078
Oncoimmunology. 2013 Sep 1;2(9):e25962
pubmed: 24327938
Eur J Immunol. 2004 Feb;34(2):336-44
pubmed: 14768038