Spray drift deposition comparison of fluorimetry and analytical confirmation techniques.

analytical confirmation techniques fluorescence tracer dye split-split plot experimental design spray drift wind tunnel

Journal

Pest management science
ISSN: 1526-4998
Titre abrégé: Pest Manag Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100898744

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
revised: 20 04 2021
received: 23 03 2021
accepted: 04 05 2021
pubmed: 5 5 2021
medline: 12 8 2021
entrez: 4 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Tracer dyes are often used as surrogates to characterize pesticide spray drift and it is assumed that they accurately reflect analytical measurement of active ingredients; however, the validity of this assumption remains inconclusive. Consequently, the influence of measurement technique on the magnitude of deposition of spray drift was investigated using spray drift samples evaluated by traditional analytical techniques (HPLC-MS/MS) and fluorimetry (1,3,6,8-pyrene-tetra sulfonic acid tetrasodium salt dye tracer). The experiment was conducted in a low-speed wind tunnel under controlled meteorological conditions. The herbicide mesotrione was sprayed through three spray air induction nozzles (anvil deflector flat fan TTI11004; flat fan AI11004; flat fan AIXR11003). Spray drift deposition samples were collected using stainless steel discs pairs placed side by side in the center of the wind tunnel at distances of 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 ft (1.5, 3.1, 6.1, 9.1, and 12.2 m) from the spray nozzle. The analytical technique determined pesticide concentration on one disc per pair, and the other was evaluated by fluorimetry. The experimental results, analyzed using the linear split-split plot model, revealed that median deposition concentrations were 15% higher using the tracer dye fluorescence method relative to the analytical method, potentially due in part to procedural recovery inefficiencies of the analytical method (the mean overall procedural recovery result and RSD was 87% ± 6.4% (n = 12). This relationship was consistent and held true for the three nozzle types at all distances within the wind tunnel. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33942978
doi: 10.1002/ps.6456
doi:

Substances chimiques

Pesticides 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

4192-4199

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.

Références

Teske ME, Bird SL, Esterly DM, Curbishley TB, Ray SL and Perry SG, AgDrift®: a model for estimating near-field spray drift from aerial applications. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:659-671 (2002).
[USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Models for Pesticide Risk Assessment (2017). Available: https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/models-pesticide-risk-assessment. [24 October 2020].
Smith PN, Armbrust KL, Chen W, Brain RA, Galic N, Ghebremichael L et al., Assessment of risks to listed species from the use of atrazine in the USA: a perspective. J Toxicol Environ Health, Part B (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.10932021.11902890.
Perine J, Anderson JC, Kruger GR, Abi-Akar F and Overmyer J, Effect of nozzle selection on deposition of thiamethoxam in Actara® spray drift and implications for off-field risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 772:144808 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144808.
Miller PCH, Spray drift and its measurement, in Application Technology for Crop Protection, ed. by Matthews GA and Hislop EC. CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 101-122 (1993).
Miller PCH and Butler Ellis MC, Effects of formulation on spray nozzle performance for applications from ground-based boom sprayers. Crop Prot 19:609-615 (2000).
Alves USGS, Kruger GR, da Cunha JPAR, Vieira BC, Henry RS, Obradovic A et al., Spray drift from dicamba and glyphosate applications in a wind tunnel. Weed Technol 31:387-395 (2017).
Brusselman E, van Driessen K, Steurbaut W, Gabriels D, Cornelis W, Nuyttens D et al., Wind tunnel evaluation of several tracer and collection techniques for the measurement of spray drift. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci 69:829-836 (2004).
National Pesticide Information Center. Available: http://npic.orst.edu. [11 December 2020].
Snoo GR and Wit PJ, Buffer zones for reducing pesticide drift to ditches and risks to aquatic organisms. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 41:112-118 (1998).
Creech CF, Henry RS, Werle R, Sandell LD, Hewitt AJ and Kruger GR, Performance of postemergence herbicides applied at different carrier volume rates. Weed Technol 29:611-624 (2015).
FIFRA Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 40, part 158 - Data Requirements for Pesticides.
Hewitt AJ, Johnson DR, Fish JD, Hermansky CG and Valcore DL, Development of the spray drift task force database for aerial applications. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:648-658 (2002).
Hewitt AJ, Teske ME and Thistle HE, The development of the AgDRIFT® model for aerial application from helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft. in Aust J Ecotoxicol 8:3-6 (2002).
Teske ME, Miller PCH, Thistle HW and Birchfield NB, Initial development and validation of a mechanistic spray drift model for ground boom sprayers. Trans ASABE 52:1089-1097 (2009).
Hoffmann W, Fritz B and Ledebuhr M, Evaluation of 1, 3, 6, 8-pyrene tetra sulfonic acid tetrasodium salt (PTSA) as an agricultural spray tracer dye. Trans ASABE Appl Eng Agric 30:25-28 (2014). https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.30.10313.
Barber J and Parkin C, Fluorescent tracer technique for measuring the quantity of pesticide deposited to soil following spray applications. Crop Prot 22:15-21 (2003).
Briand O, Bertrand F, Seux R and Millet M, Comparison of different sampling techniques for the evaluation of pesticide spray drift in apple orchards. Sci Total Environ 288:199-213 (2002).
Bui Q, Womac A, Howard K, Mulrooney J and Amin M, Evaluation of sampler for spray drift. Trans ASAE 41:37-41 (1998).
Havens PL, Hillger DE, Hewitt AJ, Kruger GR, Marchi-Werle L and Czaczyk Z, Field measurements of drift of conventional and drift control formulations of 2,4-D plus glyphosate. Weed Technol 32:550-556 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.55.
Brain RA, Perine JP, Cooke C, Butler-Ellis C, Harrington P, Lane A et al., Evaluating the effects of herbicide drift on non-target terrestrial plants: a case study with mesotrione. Environ Toxicol Chem 36:2465-2475 (2017).
Butler Ellis MC, Brain RA, Perine JW, Cooke C, Harrington P, Lane AG et al., The importance of field-based drift exposure to biological outcomes: a novel case study with mesotrione. Aspects Appl Biol 137:317-324 (2018) In International Advances in Pesticide Application. Balsari P, Cooper S, Gil E, Glass R, Smith CM, Miller P, Nuyttens D, Van de Zande J, Wood A. Eds. Association of Applied Biologists, Warwick Enterprise Park, Wellesbourne, Warwick CV35 9EF, UK. ISSN: 0265-1491.
Brain R, Goodwin G, Abi-Akar F, Lee B, Rodgers C, Flatt B et al., Winds of change, developing a non-target plant bioassay employing field-based pesticide drift exposure: a case study with atrazine. Sci Total Environ 678:239-252 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.411.
Roten RL, Ferguson JC and Hewitt AJ, Drift reducing potential of low drift nozzles with the use of spray-hoods. N Z Plant Prot 67:274-277 (2014).
Kuehl RO, Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis, 2nd edn. Brooks/Cole Publishing, CA, USA (2000).
SAS® Proprietary Software 9.4. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC (2013).
ASABE [American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers]. ANSI/ASAE S572.2 JUL2018 Spray Nozzle Classification by Droplet Spectra. ASABE, 2950 Niles Road, St. Joseph, Ml 49085-9659, USA. 6 pgs. (2018)
Butler Ellis MC, Swan T, Miller PCH, Waddelow S, Bradley A and Tuck CR, Design factors affecting spray characteristics and drift performance of air induction nozzles. Biosyst Eng 82:289-296 (2002).
Etheridge RE, Womac AR and Mueller TC, Characterization of the spray droplet spectra and patterns of four venturi-type drift reduction nozzles. Weed Technol 13:765-770 (1999).
Reichenberger S, Bach M, Skitschak A and Frede HG, Mitigation strategies to reduce pesticide inputs into ground- and surface water and their effectiveness; a review. Sci Total Environ 384:1-35 (2007).
Klein RN and Johnson AK, Nozzle tip selection and its effect on drift and efficacy. Asp Appl Biol 66:217-224 (2002).
Schleier JJ III, Preftakes C and Peterson RKD, The effect of fluorescent tracers on droplet spectrum, viscosity, and density of pesticide formulations. J Environ Sci Health Part B 45:621-625 (2010).

Auteurs

Arpad Z Szarka (AZ)

Product Safety, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC, USA.

Greg R Kruger (GR)

Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, North Platte, NE, USA.

Jeff Golus (J)

Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, North Platte, NE, USA.

Carol Rodgers (C)

Residue Chemistry and Field Programs, Eurofins EAG Agroscience, LLC, Columbia, MO, USA.

Daniel Perkins (D)

Sustainability and Environment, D and E Technical INC, Champaign, IL, USA.

Richard A Brain (RA)

Product Safety, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC, USA.

Articles similaires

Zea mays Triticum China Seasons Crops, Agricultural

Pesticide Exposure and Its Association with Parkinson's Disease: A Case-Control Analysis.

Ali Samareh, Hossein Pourghadamyari, Mohammad Hadi Nemtollahi et al.
1.00
Humans Pesticides Case-Control Studies Male Female
Ethiopia Conservation of Natural Resources Environmental Monitoring Soil Soil Erosion
Cicer Germination Proteolysis Seeds Plant Proteins

Classifications MeSH