Rapid review of the effects of cloth and medical masks for preventing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in community and household settings.
Journal
South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde
ISSN: 2078-5135
Titre abrégé: S Afr Med J
Pays: South Africa
ID NLM: 0404520
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 03 2021
02 03 2021
Historique:
received:
02
03
2021
entrez:
4
5
2021
pubmed:
5
5
2021
medline:
14
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Evidence on mask use in the general population is needed to inform SARS-CoV-2 responses. To assess the effectiveness of cloth and medical masks for preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission in community settings. Two rapid reviews were conducted searching three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) and two clinical trials registries on 30 and 31 March 2020. We screened 821 records and assessed nine full-text articles for eligibility. One and seven RCTs were included for cloth and medical mask reviews, respectively. No SARS-CoV-2-specific RCTs and no cloth mask RCTs in community settings were identified. A single hospital-based RCT provided indirect evidence that, compared with medical masks, cloth masks probably increase clinical respiratory illnesses (relative risk (RR) 1.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98 - 2.49) and laboratory-confirmed respiratory virus infections (RR 1.54; 95% CI 0.88 - 2.70). Evidence for influenza-like illnesses (ILI) was uncertain (RR 13.00; 95% CI 1.69 - 100.03). Two RCTs provide low-certainty evidence that medical masks may make little to no difference to ILI infection risk versus no masks (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.81 - 1.19) in the community setting. Five RCTs provide low-certainty evidence that medical masks may slightly reduce infection risk v. no masks (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.55 - 1.20) in the household setting. Direct evidence for cloth and medical mask efficacy and effectiveness in the community is limited. Decision-making for mask use may consider other factors such as feasibility and SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics; however, well-designed comparative effectiveness studies are required.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Evidence on mask use in the general population is needed to inform SARS-CoV-2 responses.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness of cloth and medical masks for preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission in community settings.
METHODS
Two rapid reviews were conducted searching three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) and two clinical trials registries on 30 and 31 March 2020.
RESULTS
We screened 821 records and assessed nine full-text articles for eligibility. One and seven RCTs were included for cloth and medical mask reviews, respectively. No SARS-CoV-2-specific RCTs and no cloth mask RCTs in community settings were identified. A single hospital-based RCT provided indirect evidence that, compared with medical masks, cloth masks probably increase clinical respiratory illnesses (relative risk (RR) 1.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98 - 2.49) and laboratory-confirmed respiratory virus infections (RR 1.54; 95% CI 0.88 - 2.70). Evidence for influenza-like illnesses (ILI) was uncertain (RR 13.00; 95% CI 1.69 - 100.03). Two RCTs provide low-certainty evidence that medical masks may make little to no difference to ILI infection risk versus no masks (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.81 - 1.19) in the community setting. Five RCTs provide low-certainty evidence that medical masks may slightly reduce infection risk v. no masks (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.55 - 1.20) in the household setting.
CONCLUSIONS
Direct evidence for cloth and medical mask efficacy and effectiveness in the community is limited. Decision-making for mask use may consider other factors such as feasibility and SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics; however, well-designed comparative effectiveness studies are required.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33944744
doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i3.15119
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM