Measuring quality of family planning counselling and its effects on uptake of contraceptives in public health facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India: A cross-sectional analysis.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
11
09
2020
accepted:
10
04
2021
entrez:
4
5
2021
pubmed:
5
5
2021
medline:
8
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Quality of care in family planning traditionally focuses on promoting awareness of the broad array of contraceptive options rather than on the quality of interpersonal communication offered by family planning (FP) providers. There is a growing emphasis on person-centered contraceptive counselling, care that is respectful and focuses on meeting the reproductive needs of a couple, rather than fertility regulation. Despite the increasing global focus on person-centered care, little is known about the quality of FP care provided in low- and middle- income countries like India. This study involves the development and psychometric testing of a Quality of Family Planning Counselling (QFPC) measure, and assessment of its associations with contraceptives selected by clients subsequently. We analyzed cross-sectional survey data from N = 237 women following their FP counselling in 120 public health facilities (District Hospitals and Community Health Centers) sampled across the state of Uttar Pradesh in India. The study captured QFPC, contraceptives selected by clients post-counselling, as well as client and provider characteristics. Based on formative research and using Principal Component Analysis, we developed a 13-item measure of quality of FP counselling. We used adjusted regression models to assess the association between QFPC and contraceptive selected post-counselling. The QFPC measure demonstrated good internal reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.80) as well as criterion validity, as indicated by client reports of high QFPC being significantly more likely for clients with trained versus untrained counsellors. We found that each point increase in QFPC, including increasing quality of counselling, is associated with higher odds of clients selecting an intrauterine device (IUD) (aRR:1.03; 95% CI:1.01-1.05) and sterilization (aRR:1.06; 95% CI:1.03-1.08), compared to no method selected. High-quality FP counselling is associated with clients subsequently selecting more effective contraceptives, including IUD and sterilization, in India. High-quality counselling is also more likely among FP-trained providers, highlighting the need for focused training and monitoring of quality care. CTRI/2015/09/006219. Registered 28 September 2015.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Quality of care in family planning traditionally focuses on promoting awareness of the broad array of contraceptive options rather than on the quality of interpersonal communication offered by family planning (FP) providers. There is a growing emphasis on person-centered contraceptive counselling, care that is respectful and focuses on meeting the reproductive needs of a couple, rather than fertility regulation. Despite the increasing global focus on person-centered care, little is known about the quality of FP care provided in low- and middle- income countries like India. This study involves the development and psychometric testing of a Quality of Family Planning Counselling (QFPC) measure, and assessment of its associations with contraceptives selected by clients subsequently.
METHODS
We analyzed cross-sectional survey data from N = 237 women following their FP counselling in 120 public health facilities (District Hospitals and Community Health Centers) sampled across the state of Uttar Pradesh in India. The study captured QFPC, contraceptives selected by clients post-counselling, as well as client and provider characteristics. Based on formative research and using Principal Component Analysis, we developed a 13-item measure of quality of FP counselling. We used adjusted regression models to assess the association between QFPC and contraceptive selected post-counselling.
RESULTS
The QFPC measure demonstrated good internal reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.80) as well as criterion validity, as indicated by client reports of high QFPC being significantly more likely for clients with trained versus untrained counsellors. We found that each point increase in QFPC, including increasing quality of counselling, is associated with higher odds of clients selecting an intrauterine device (IUD) (aRR:1.03; 95% CI:1.01-1.05) and sterilization (aRR:1.06; 95% CI:1.03-1.08), compared to no method selected.
CONCLUSIONS
High-quality FP counselling is associated with clients subsequently selecting more effective contraceptives, including IUD and sterilization, in India. High-quality counselling is also more likely among FP-trained providers, highlighting the need for focused training and monitoring of quality care.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
CTRI/2015/09/006219. Registered 28 September 2015.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33945555
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239565
pii: PONE-D-20-28620
pmc: PMC8096066
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contraceptive Agents
0
Banques de données
CTRI
['CTRI/2015/09/006219']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0239565Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests. The study was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Authors AKD, AC, ND, DC, KS, and VC were employed by Sambodhi Research and Communications. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Stud Fam Plann. 2018 Sep;49(3):237-258
pubmed: 30069983
Stud Fam Plann. 2019 Jun;50(2):179-193
pubmed: 31120148
J Health Popul Nutr. 2014 Mar;32(1):142-8
pubmed: 24847603
Stud Fam Plann. 2014 Jun;45(2):151-69
pubmed: 24931073
WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2013 Apr-Jun;2(2):106-112
pubmed: 28612768
J Sex Res. 2017 May -Jun;54(4-5):642-650
pubmed: 26983682
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:89-108
pubmed: 25785886
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Nov;9(11):LE01-4
pubmed: 26674943
BMC Womens Health. 2012 Mar 29;12:8
pubmed: 22458444
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 24;19(1):331
pubmed: 31126283
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003 Nov-Dec;35(6):256-60
pubmed: 14744657
Stud Fam Plann. 2009 Sep;40(3):205-14
pubmed: 19852410
Stud Fam Plann. 1990 Mar-Apr;21(2):61-91
pubmed: 2191476
Online J Public Health Inform. 2016 Sep 15;8(2):e192
pubmed: 27752298
BMJ. 2000 Nov 18;321(7271):1255-9
pubmed: 11082085
Adv Contracept. 1993 Jun;9(2):129-39
pubmed: 8237566
Contracept X. 2020 Jul 26;2:100035
pubmed: 32793878
Reprod Med Biol. 2006 May 19;5(2):111-121
pubmed: 29699243
Contraception. 2017 Sep;96(3):133-137
pubmed: 28645786
Biodemography Soc Biol. 2009;55(1):52-70
pubmed: 19835100
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Jun;91(6):775-80
pubmed: 18697372
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2017 Jan 13;3:1
pubmed: 28101373
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 25;19(1):421
pubmed: 31238935
Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2005 Mar;31(1):15-23
pubmed: 15888405
Contraception. 2018 Jan;97(1):34-40
pubmed: 28935217
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013 Jul 26;1(2):180-92
pubmed: 25276531
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Mar;88(3):314-7
pubmed: 15962637
JAMA. 2006 Apr 19;295(15):1809-23
pubmed: 16622143
Stud Fam Plann. 2019 Jun;50(2):137-158
pubmed: 31120147
BJOG. 2014 Dec;121(13):1633-40
pubmed: 24893887
BMC Public Health. 2013;13 Suppl 3:S6
pubmed: 24564713
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;215(1):78.e1-9
pubmed: 26827879
Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2811-2824
pubmed: 27072119
Lancet. 2011 Feb 12;377(9765):587-98
pubmed: 21227499
Stud Fam Plann. 2018 Jun;49(2):171-179
pubmed: 29708277
Cancer Causes Control. 2001 Oct;12(8):703-11
pubmed: 11562110
Reprod Health. 2019 Jan 23;16(1):7
pubmed: 30674323
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;57(4):659-73
pubmed: 25264697
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Dec;40(4):206-14
pubmed: 25565348
Afr J Reprod Health. 2015 Dec;19(4):50-7
pubmed: 27337853