Experimental Study on the Influence of Tool Electrode Material on Electrochemical Micromachining of 304 Stainless Steel.

cathode material electrochemical machining machining quality oxide film stray current corrosion

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Apr 2021
Historique:
received: 13 04 2021
revised: 26 04 2021
accepted: 27 04 2021
entrez: 5 5 2021
pubmed: 6 5 2021
medline: 6 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Different cathode materials have different surface chemical components and machining capacities, which may finally result in different machining quality and machining efficiency of workpieces. In this paper, in order to investigate the influence of cathode materials on the electrochemical machining of thin-walled workpiece made of 304 stainless steel, five cylindrical electrodes are used as the target working cathodes of electrochemical machining to conduct experiments and research, including 45# steel, 304 stainless steel, aluminum alloy 6061, brass H62, and tungsten steel YK15. The stray current corrosion, taper, and material removal rate were used as the criteria to evaluate the drilling quality of efficiency of a thin-walled workpiece made of 304 stainless steel. The research results show that from the perspectives of stray current corrosion and taper, aluminum alloy 6061 is an optimal tool cathode, which should be used in the electrochemical machining of thin-walled workpieces made of 304 stainless steel; on the aspect of material removal rate, the 45# steel, 304 stainless steel, and aluminum alloy 6061 present close material removal rates, all of which are higher than that of brass H62 and tungsten steel YK15. Based on comprehensive consideration of both machining quality and machining efficiency, the aluminum alloy 6061 is the best option as the cathode tool in the electrochemical machining of thin-walled workpieces made of 304 stainless steel.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33946885
pii: ma14092311
doi: 10.3390/ma14092311
pmc: PMC8124585
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Open Research Fund Program of Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Non-Traditional Machining
ID : SXTZKFJJ202004
Organisme : the Doctoral Foundation Project of Longdong University
ID : XYBY1905

Auteurs

Jianxiao Bian (J)

School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Technological University, Xi'an 710021, China.
School of Mechanical Engineering, Longdong University, Qingyang 745000, China.

Baoji Ma (B)

School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Technological University, Xi'an 710021, China.
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Non-Traditional Machining, Xi'an 710021, China.

Haihong Ai (H)

School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Technological University, Xi'an 710021, China.

Lijun Qi (L)

School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Technological University, Xi'an 710021, China.

Classifications MeSH