Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of adding ivermectin to treatment in severe COVID-19 patients.
ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B
/ genetics
Aged
Amides
/ therapeutic use
Antiviral Agents
/ pharmacokinetics
Azithromycin
/ therapeutic use
COVID-19
/ blood
Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A
/ genetics
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Humans
Hydroxychloroquine
/ therapeutic use
Ivermectin
/ pharmacokinetics
Male
Middle Aged
Pneumonia, Viral
/ blood
Prospective Studies
Pyrazines
/ therapeutic use
Single-Blind Method
Treatment Outcome
COVID-19 Drug Treatment
COVID-19
Ivermectin
SARS CoV-2
Treatment
Journal
BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 May 2021
04 May 2021
Historique:
received:
08
02
2021
accepted:
15
04
2021
entrez:
5
5
2021
pubmed:
6
5
2021
medline:
18
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
An effective treatment option is not yet available for SARS-CoV2, which causes the COVID-19 pandemic and whose effects are felt more and more every day. Ivermectin is among the drugs whose effectiveness in treatment has been investigated. In this study; it was aimed to investigate the presence of gene mutations that alter ivermectin metabolism and cause toxic effects in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, and to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ivermectin use in the treatment of patients without mutation. Patients with severe COVID19 pneumonia were included in the study, which was planned as a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind phase 3 study. Two groups, the study group and the control group, took part in the study. Ivermectin 200 mcg/kg/day for 5 days in the form of a solution prepared for enteral use added to the reference treatment protocol -hydroxychloroquine + favipiravir + azithromycin- of patients included in the study group. Patients in the control group were given only reference treatment with 3 other drugs without ivermectin. The presence of mutations was investigated by performing sequence analysis in the mdr1/abcab1 gene with the Sanger method in patients included in the study group according to randomization. Patients with mutations were excluded from the study and ivermectin treatment was not continued. Patients were followed for 5 days after treatment. At the end of the treatment and follow-up period, clinical response and changes in laboratory parameters were evaluated. A total of 66 patients, 36 in the study group and 30 in the control group were included in the study. Mutations affecting ivermectin metabolism was detected in genetic tests of six (16.7%) patients in the study group and they were excluded from the study. At the end of the 5-day follow-up period, the rate of clinical improvement was 73.3% (22/30) in the study group and was 53.3% (16/30) in the control group (p = 0.10). At the end of the study, mortality developed in 6 patients (20%) in the study group and in 9 (30%) patients in the control group (p = 0.37). At the end of the follow-up period, the average peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) values of the study and control groups were found to be 93.5 and 93.0%, respectively. Partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/FiO2 ratios were determined as 236.3 ± 85.7 and 220.8 ± 127.3 in the study and control groups, respectively. While the blood lymphocyte count was higher in the study group compared to the control group (1698 ± 1438 and 1256 ± 710, respectively) at the end of the follow-up period (p = 0.24); reduction in serum C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin and D-dimer levels was more pronounced in the study group (p = 0.02, p = 0.005 and p = 0.03, respectively). According to the findings obtained, ivermectin can provide an increase in clinical recovery, improvement in prognostic laboratory parameters and a decrease in mortality rates even when used in patients with severe COVID-19. Consequently, ivermectin should be considered as an alternative drug that can be used in the treatment of COVID-19 disease or as an additional option to existing protocols.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
An effective treatment option is not yet available for SARS-CoV2, which causes the COVID-19 pandemic and whose effects are felt more and more every day. Ivermectin is among the drugs whose effectiveness in treatment has been investigated. In this study; it was aimed to investigate the presence of gene mutations that alter ivermectin metabolism and cause toxic effects in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, and to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ivermectin use in the treatment of patients without mutation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
Patients with severe COVID19 pneumonia were included in the study, which was planned as a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind phase 3 study. Two groups, the study group and the control group, took part in the study. Ivermectin 200 mcg/kg/day for 5 days in the form of a solution prepared for enteral use added to the reference treatment protocol -hydroxychloroquine + favipiravir + azithromycin- of patients included in the study group. Patients in the control group were given only reference treatment with 3 other drugs without ivermectin. The presence of mutations was investigated by performing sequence analysis in the mdr1/abcab1 gene with the Sanger method in patients included in the study group according to randomization. Patients with mutations were excluded from the study and ivermectin treatment was not continued. Patients were followed for 5 days after treatment. At the end of the treatment and follow-up period, clinical response and changes in laboratory parameters were evaluated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 66 patients, 36 in the study group and 30 in the control group were included in the study. Mutations affecting ivermectin metabolism was detected in genetic tests of six (16.7%) patients in the study group and they were excluded from the study. At the end of the 5-day follow-up period, the rate of clinical improvement was 73.3% (22/30) in the study group and was 53.3% (16/30) in the control group (p = 0.10). At the end of the study, mortality developed in 6 patients (20%) in the study group and in 9 (30%) patients in the control group (p = 0.37). At the end of the follow-up period, the average peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) values of the study and control groups were found to be 93.5 and 93.0%, respectively. Partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/FiO2 ratios were determined as 236.3 ± 85.7 and 220.8 ± 127.3 in the study and control groups, respectively. While the blood lymphocyte count was higher in the study group compared to the control group (1698 ± 1438 and 1256 ± 710, respectively) at the end of the follow-up period (p = 0.24); reduction in serum C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin and D-dimer levels was more pronounced in the study group (p = 0.02, p = 0.005 and p = 0.03, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
According to the findings obtained, ivermectin can provide an increase in clinical recovery, improvement in prognostic laboratory parameters and a decrease in mortality rates even when used in patients with severe COVID-19. Consequently, ivermectin should be considered as an alternative drug that can be used in the treatment of COVID-19 disease or as an additional option to existing protocols.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33947344
doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06104-9
pii: 10.1186/s12879-021-06104-9
pmc: PMC8093585
doi:
Substances chimiques
ABCB1 protein, human
0
ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B
0
Amides
0
Antiviral Agents
0
Pyrazines
0
Hydroxychloroquine
4QWG6N8QKH
Ivermectin
70288-86-7
Azithromycin
83905-01-5
Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A
EC 1.14.14.1
CYP3A4 protein, human
EC 1.14.14.55
favipiravir
EW5GL2X7E0
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
411Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 7;382(19):1787-1799
pubmed: 32187464
Chest. 2021 Jan;159(1):85-92
pubmed: 33065103
Crit Care. 2020 Jul 6;24(1):394
pubmed: 32631393
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Aug 24;12(16):15946-15953
pubmed: 32833671
Int J Biomater. 2016;2016:8043983
pubmed: 27242902
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Aug;67(8):1884-94
pubmed: 22535622
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 May;32(5):554-558
pubmed: 32576346
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Feb;98(2):382-388
pubmed: 29210346
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020 Jun;53(3):436-443
pubmed: 32307245
Respir Res. 2020 Jul 3;21(1):169
pubmed: 32620118
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 May;94:91-95
pubmed: 32173574
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 5;383(19):1813-1826
pubmed: 32445440
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2012-2022
pubmed: 32227758
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):475-481
pubmed: 32105632
New Microbes New Infect. 2020 Apr 22;35:100684
pubmed: 32322397
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720
pubmed: 32109013
J Transl Med. 2020 May 20;18(1):206
pubmed: 32434518
Pulmonology. 2020 Jul - Aug;26(4):213-220
pubmed: 32362507
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Feb;24(4):2012-2019
pubmed: 32141570
J Med Virol. 2020 Sep;92(9):1419-1420
pubmed: 32266993
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 17;8(1):12401
pubmed: 30120322
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2020 May 12;43(5):431-436
pubmed: 32450631
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 09;:
pubmed: 32770240
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2020 Sep;73(9):593-602
pubmed: 32533071
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Apr;24(8):4539-4547
pubmed: 32373993
Eur J Intern Med. 2020 Jun;76:31-35
pubmed: 32405160
Antiviral Res. 2020 Jun;178:104787
pubmed: 32251768
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1021-1028
pubmed: 32286245
J Med Virol. 2020 Jun;92(6):612-617
pubmed: 32108351