How do healthcare providers respond to multiple funding flows? A conceptual framework and options to align them.
Provider payment methods
multiple funding flows
provider behaviour
purchasing
Journal
Health policy and planning
ISSN: 1460-2237
Titre abrégé: Health Policy Plan
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8610614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Jun 2021
25 Jun 2021
Historique:
accepted:
01
02
2021
pubmed:
6
5
2021
medline:
29
7
2021
entrez:
5
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Provider payment methods are a key health policy lever because they influence healthcare provider behaviour and affect health system objectives, such as efficiency, equity, financial protection and quality. Previous research focused on analysing individual provider payment methods in isolation, or on the actions of individual purchasers. However, purchasers typically use a mix of provider payment methods to pay healthcare providers and most health systems are fragmented with multiple purchasers. From a health provider perspective, these different payments are experienced as multiple funding flows which together send a complex set of signals about where they should focus their effort. In this article, we argue that there is a need to expand the analysis of provider payment methods to include an analysis of the interactions of multiple funding flows and the combined effect of their incentives on the provision of healthcare services. The purpose of the article is to highlight the importance of multiple funding flows to health facilities and present a conceptual framework to guide their analysis. The framework hypothesizes that when healthcare providers receive multiple funding flows, they may find certain funding flows more favourable than others based on how these funding flows compare to each other on a range of attributes. This creates a set of incentives, and consequently, healthcare providers may alter their behaviour in three ways: resource shifting, service shifting and cost shifting. We describe these behaviours and how they may affect health system objectives. Our analysis underlines the need to align the incentives generated by multiple funding flows. To achieve this, we propose three policy strategies that relate to the governance of healthcare purchasing: reducing the fragmentation of health financing arrangements to decrease the number of multiple purchaser arrangements and funding flows; harmonizing signals from multiple funding flows; and constraining providers from responding to undesirable incentives.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33948635
pii: 6264892
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab003
pmc: PMC8227448
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
861-868Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Organisme : United Kingdom Department for International Development and the EU-Luxembourg-WHO UHC Partnership Program
Organisme : UK Aid from the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DfID)
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Références
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 2;13(4):e0195179
pubmed: 29608610
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Dec 28;16(1):216
pubmed: 29282087
Front Public Health. 2020 Jan 15;7:403
pubmed: 32010658
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1995 Jan-Mar;10(1):23-45
pubmed: 10142120
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Feb 1;98(2):126-131
pubmed: 32015583
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Oct 25;3(5):e000917
pubmed: 30483406
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Oct;33(4):e892-e905
pubmed: 29984422
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Oct 02;8(1):4-17
pubmed: 30709098
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Feb 1;98(2):132-139
pubmed: 32015584
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Dec 21;18(1):198
pubmed: 31864355
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Feb 3;19(1):19
pubmed: 32013955
PLoS Med. 2011 Aug;8(8):e1001079
pubmed: 21886488
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 27;18(1):996
pubmed: 30587185
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 May 29;8(8):501-504
pubmed: 31441291
Milbank Q. 2011 Mar;89(1):90-130
pubmed: 21418314