Usability and Accuracy of a Smartwatch for the Assessment of Physical Activity in the Elderly Population: Observational Study.
elderly
physical activity
smartwatches
wearable devices
Journal
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
ISSN: 2291-5222
Titre abrégé: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101624439
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 05 2021
05 05 2021
Historique:
received:
02
06
2020
accepted:
24
02
2021
revised:
02
10
2020
entrez:
5
5
2021
pubmed:
6
5
2021
medline:
22
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Regular physical activity (PA) contributes to the primary and secondary prevention of several chronic diseases and reduces the risk of premature death. Physical inactivity is a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and a variety of chronic disorders such as diabetes, obesity, hypertension, bone and joint diseases (eg, osteoporosis and osteoarthritis), depression, and colon and breast cancer. Population aging and the related increase in chronic diseases have a major impact on the health care systems of most Western countries and will produce an even more significant effect in the future. Monitoring PA is a valuable method of determining whether people are performing enough PA so as to prevent chronic diseases or are showing early symptoms of those diseases. The aim of this study was to estimate the accuracy of wearable devices in quantifying the PA of elderly people in a real-life setting. Participants aged 70 to 90 years with the ability to walk safely without any walking aid for at least 300 meters, who had no walking disabilities or episodes of falling while walking in the last 12 months, were asked to walk 150 meters at their preferred pace wearing a vívoactive HR device (Garmin Ltd) and actual steps were monitored and tallied by a researcher using a hand-tally counter to assess the performance of the device at a natural speed. A Bland-Altman plot was used to analyze the difference between manually counted steps and wearable device-measured steps. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was computed (with a 95% confidence interval) between step measurements. The generalized linear mixed-model (GLMM) ICCs were estimated, providing a random effect term (random intercept) for the individual measurements (gold standard and device). Both adjusted and conditional ICCs were computed for the GLMM models considering separately the effect of age, sex, BMI, and obesity. Analyses were performed using R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) with the rms package. A total of 23 females and 26 males were enrolled in the study. The median age of the participants was 75 years. The Bland-Altman plot revealed that, excluding one observation, all differences across measurements were in the confidence bounds, demonstrating the substantial agreement between the step count measurements. The results were confirmed by an ICC equal to .98 (.96-.99), demonstrating excellent agreement between the two sets of measurements. The level of accuracy of wearable devices in quantifying the PA of elderly people in a real-life setting that was found in this study supports the idea of considering wrist-wearable nonmedical devices (widely available in nonspecialized stores) as reliable tools. Both health care professionals and informal caregivers could monitor the level of PA of their patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Regular physical activity (PA) contributes to the primary and secondary prevention of several chronic diseases and reduces the risk of premature death. Physical inactivity is a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and a variety of chronic disorders such as diabetes, obesity, hypertension, bone and joint diseases (eg, osteoporosis and osteoarthritis), depression, and colon and breast cancer. Population aging and the related increase in chronic diseases have a major impact on the health care systems of most Western countries and will produce an even more significant effect in the future. Monitoring PA is a valuable method of determining whether people are performing enough PA so as to prevent chronic diseases or are showing early symptoms of those diseases.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to estimate the accuracy of wearable devices in quantifying the PA of elderly people in a real-life setting.
METHODS
Participants aged 70 to 90 years with the ability to walk safely without any walking aid for at least 300 meters, who had no walking disabilities or episodes of falling while walking in the last 12 months, were asked to walk 150 meters at their preferred pace wearing a vívoactive HR device (Garmin Ltd) and actual steps were monitored and tallied by a researcher using a hand-tally counter to assess the performance of the device at a natural speed. A Bland-Altman plot was used to analyze the difference between manually counted steps and wearable device-measured steps. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was computed (with a 95% confidence interval) between step measurements. The generalized linear mixed-model (GLMM) ICCs were estimated, providing a random effect term (random intercept) for the individual measurements (gold standard and device). Both adjusted and conditional ICCs were computed for the GLMM models considering separately the effect of age, sex, BMI, and obesity. Analyses were performed using R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) with the rms package.
RESULTS
A total of 23 females and 26 males were enrolled in the study. The median age of the participants was 75 years. The Bland-Altman plot revealed that, excluding one observation, all differences across measurements were in the confidence bounds, demonstrating the substantial agreement between the step count measurements. The results were confirmed by an ICC equal to .98 (.96-.99), demonstrating excellent agreement between the two sets of measurements.
CONCLUSIONS
The level of accuracy of wearable devices in quantifying the PA of elderly people in a real-life setting that was found in this study supports the idea of considering wrist-wearable nonmedical devices (widely available in nonspecialized stores) as reliable tools. Both health care professionals and informal caregivers could monitor the level of PA of their patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33949953
pii: v9i5e20966
doi: 10.2196/20966
pmc: PMC8135023
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e20966Informations de copyright
©Matteo Martinato, Giulia Lorenzoni, Tommaso Zanchi, Alessia Bergamin, Alessia Buratin, Danila Azzolina, Dario Gregori. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 05.05.2021.
Références
JAMA. 2015 Feb 10;313(6):625-6
pubmed: 25668268
CMAJ. 2006 Mar 14;174(6):801-9
pubmed: 16534088
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Apr;31(4):1097-1106
pubmed: 27465631
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018 Apr;58(4):534-548
pubmed: 28488834
Sports Med. 2001 Feb;31(2):91-100
pubmed: 11227981
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Oct 06;18(10):e268
pubmed: 27713114
Eur J Sport Sci. 2017 Apr;17(3):360-368
pubmed: 27912681
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Dec 18;12:159
pubmed: 26684758
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 Aug;23(4):924-9
pubmed: 23642841
Gait Posture. 2018 Jun;63:104-108
pubmed: 29729611
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Jan;112(1):49-57
pubmed: 21479653
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016 Aug;71(8):1039-48
pubmed: 26957472
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2015 Jul 8;1(1):e000013
pubmed: 27900119
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jun 03;17(6):
pubmed: 28587188
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Feb 22;17(2):
pubmed: 28241434
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Jul;28(7):1818-1827
pubmed: 29460319
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Dec 10;6(12):e10338
pubmed: 30530451
JAMA. 2007 Nov 21;298(19):2296-304
pubmed: 18029834
J R Soc Interface. 2017 Sep;14(134):
pubmed: 28904005
J Aging Phys Act. 2018 Jan 1;26(1):128-135
pubmed: 28595019
J Med Eng Technol. 2017 Aug;41(6):480-485
pubmed: 28675070
Stat Med. 2002 May 15;21(9):1331-5
pubmed: 12111881
Br J Sports Med. 2003 Jun;37(3):197-206; discussion 206
pubmed: 12782543
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2015 Oct 12;7:24
pubmed: 26464801
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jan 27;4(1):e7
pubmed: 26818775
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;99(9):1890-1899
pubmed: 29138050