Global population genetic structure and demographic trajectories of the black soldier fly, Hermetia illucens.
Allelic richness
Approximate Bayesian computation
Diptera
Founder effect
Genetic differentiation
Genetic drift
Invasive species
Isolation by distance
Serial introductions
Stratiomyidae
Journal
BMC biology
ISSN: 1741-7007
Titre abrégé: BMC Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190720
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 05 2021
05 05 2021
Historique:
received:
04
10
2020
accepted:
16
04
2021
entrez:
6
5
2021
pubmed:
7
5
2021
medline:
2
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) is the most promising insect candidate for nutrient-recycling through bioconversion of organic waste into biomass, thereby improving sustainability of protein supplies for animal feed and facilitating transition to a circular economy. Contrary to conventional livestock, genetic resources of farmed insects remain poorly characterised. We present the first comprehensive population genetic characterisation of H. illucens. Based on 15 novel microsatellite markers, we genotyped and analysed 2862 individuals from 150 wild and captive populations originating from 57 countries on seven subcontinents. We identified 16 well-distinguished genetic clusters indicating substantial global population structure. The data revealed genetic hotspots in central South America and successive northwards range expansions within the indigenous ranges of the Americas. Colonisations and naturalisations of largely unique genetic profiles occurred on all non-native continents, either preceded by demographically independent founder events from various single sources or involving admixture scenarios. A decisive primarily admixed Polynesian bridgehead population serially colonised the entire Australasian region and its secondarily admixed descendants successively mediated invasions into Africa and Europe. Conversely, captive populations from several continents traced back to a single North American origin and exhibit considerably reduced genetic diversity, although some farmed strains carry distinct genetic signatures. We highlight genetic footprints characteristic of progressing domestication due to increasing socio-economic importance of H. illucens, and ongoing introgression between domesticated strains globally traded for large-scale farming and wild populations in some regions. We document the dynamic population genetic history of a cosmopolitan dipteran of South American origin shaped by striking geographic patterns. These reflect both ancient dispersal routes, and stochastic and heterogeneous anthropogenic introductions during the last century leading to pronounced diversification of worldwide structure of H. illucens. Upon the recent advent of its agronomic commercialisation, however, current human-mediated translocations of the black soldier fly largely involve genetically highly uniform domesticated strains, which meanwhile threaten the genetic integrity of differentiated unique local resources through introgression. Our in-depth reconstruction of the contemporary and historical demographic trajectories of H. illucens emphasises benchmarking potential for applied future research on this emerging model of the prospering insect-livestock sector.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) is the most promising insect candidate for nutrient-recycling through bioconversion of organic waste into biomass, thereby improving sustainability of protein supplies for animal feed and facilitating transition to a circular economy. Contrary to conventional livestock, genetic resources of farmed insects remain poorly characterised. We present the first comprehensive population genetic characterisation of H. illucens. Based on 15 novel microsatellite markers, we genotyped and analysed 2862 individuals from 150 wild and captive populations originating from 57 countries on seven subcontinents.
RESULTS
We identified 16 well-distinguished genetic clusters indicating substantial global population structure. The data revealed genetic hotspots in central South America and successive northwards range expansions within the indigenous ranges of the Americas. Colonisations and naturalisations of largely unique genetic profiles occurred on all non-native continents, either preceded by demographically independent founder events from various single sources or involving admixture scenarios. A decisive primarily admixed Polynesian bridgehead population serially colonised the entire Australasian region and its secondarily admixed descendants successively mediated invasions into Africa and Europe. Conversely, captive populations from several continents traced back to a single North American origin and exhibit considerably reduced genetic diversity, although some farmed strains carry distinct genetic signatures. We highlight genetic footprints characteristic of progressing domestication due to increasing socio-economic importance of H. illucens, and ongoing introgression between domesticated strains globally traded for large-scale farming and wild populations in some regions.
CONCLUSIONS
We document the dynamic population genetic history of a cosmopolitan dipteran of South American origin shaped by striking geographic patterns. These reflect both ancient dispersal routes, and stochastic and heterogeneous anthropogenic introductions during the last century leading to pronounced diversification of worldwide structure of H. illucens. Upon the recent advent of its agronomic commercialisation, however, current human-mediated translocations of the black soldier fly largely involve genetically highly uniform domesticated strains, which meanwhile threaten the genetic integrity of differentiated unique local resources through introgression. Our in-depth reconstruction of the contemporary and historical demographic trajectories of H. illucens emphasises benchmarking potential for applied future research on this emerging model of the prospering insect-livestock sector.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33952283
doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01029-w
pii: 10.1186/s12915-021-01029-w
pmc: PMC8101212
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
94Subventions
Organisme : Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft
ID : 627000824
Organisme : Swiss National Science Foundation
ID : IZ01Z0_147278
Pays : Switzerland
Organisme : Swiss National Science Foundation
ID : 400540_152154
Pays : Switzerland
Organisme : Austrian Science Foundation
ID : FWF P32275
Organisme : Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
ID : 108866-001
Organisme : National Research Foundation, South Africa
ID : CSRP170506229933
Références
Animals (Basel). 2018 Oct 03;8(10):
pubmed: 30282918
Trends Ecol Evol. 2018 Jul;33(7):527-534
pubmed: 29764688
Ecol Lett. 2021 Mar;24(3):393-397
pubmed: 33226184
Mol Ecol Resour. 2015 Sep;15(5):1172-8
pubmed: 25644761
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 19;94(17):9197-201
pubmed: 9256459
Evol Appl. 2009 Nov;2(4):504-22
pubmed: 25567895
Evolution. 2009 Jun;63(6):1439-50
pubmed: 19228189
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 29;5(12):e14445
pubmed: 21206900
Mol Biol Evol. 2020 Sep 1;37(9):2661-2678
pubmed: 32413142
Evol Appl. 2012 Jul;5(5):481-8
pubmed: 22949923
Nature. 2010 Sep 30;467(7315):587-90
pubmed: 20844486
J Med Entomol. 2013 Nov;50(6):1224-30
pubmed: 24843926
Microb Ecol. 2019 May;77(4):913-930
pubmed: 30430196
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019 Feb 19;10:12
pubmed: 30820321
Annu Rev Entomol. 2013;58:563-83
pubmed: 23020616
Genetics. 1978 Jul;89(3):583-90
pubmed: 17248844
Mol Ecol. 2015 May;24(9):2095-111
pubmed: 25846825
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 26;107(43):18371-4
pubmed: 20921375
Curr Biol. 2011 Mar 8;21(5):424-7
pubmed: 21333536
Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Apr;29(4):233-42
pubmed: 24636862
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 7;278(1722):3161-70
pubmed: 21885467
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0144601
pubmed: 26699129
Animals (Basel). 2019 Apr 16;9(4):
pubmed: 30995783
J Econ Entomol. 2018 Aug 3;111(4):1682-1690
pubmed: 29635387
BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Dec 01;11:348
pubmed: 22132834
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Mar;79(6):1940-4
pubmed: 16593171
Mol Ecol. 2019 Mar;28(5):951-967
pubmed: 30672635
Trends Genet. 2013 Apr;29(4):197-205
pubmed: 23415592
Genetics. 1997 Apr;145(4):1219-28
pubmed: 9093870
Agric Syst. 2017 May;153:190-200
pubmed: 28579671
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):136-44
pubmed: 19178981
Science. 2015 Oct 16;350(6258):267-9
pubmed: 26472890
PeerJ. 2014 Mar 04;2:e281
pubmed: 24688859
Bioinformatics. 2019 Feb 1;35(3):526-528
pubmed: 30016406
J R Soc Interface. 2015 Dec 6;12(113):20150891
pubmed: 26674194
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Jan;17(1):5-11
pubmed: 27327208
Genetics. 2017 Jan;205(1):333-351
pubmed: 27821433
Cell Res. 2020 Jan;30(1):50-60
pubmed: 31767972
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Apr 1;34(4):980-996
pubmed: 28122970
Waste Manag. 2015 Jan;35:68-80
pubmed: 25453313
Genetics. 2009 Apr;181(4):1493-505
pubmed: 19189949
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206097
pubmed: 30383771
Nat Rev Genet. 2008 Jun;9(6):477-85
pubmed: 18427557
Evol Bioinform Online. 2007 Feb 23;1:47-50
pubmed: 19325852
Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63
pubmed: 18481363
Evol Appl. 2012 Jan;5(1):89-101
pubmed: 25568032
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2018 Jul 9;9:49
pubmed: 30002825
Environ Entomol. 2015 Apr;44(2):406-10
pubmed: 26313195
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):3070-1
pubmed: 21926124
mBio. 2019 Nov 5;10(6):
pubmed: 31690673
Heredity (Edinb). 2007 Jun;98(6):340-8
pubmed: 17473869
G3 (Bethesda). 2021 May 7;11(5):
pubmed: 33734373
Mol Ecol. 2011 Nov;20(22):4654-70
pubmed: 22004292
Methods Ecol Evol. 2018 Apr;9(4):1006-1016
pubmed: 29938015
Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Jan;14(1):209-14
pubmed: 23992227
Mol Ecol. 2010 Oct;19(19):4113-30
pubmed: 20723048
J Econ Entomol. 2017 Aug 1;110(4):1501-1507
pubmed: 28525620
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 14;8(1):1290
pubmed: 29138387
Environ Microbiol Rep. 2020 Apr;12(2):220-228
pubmed: 32003146
Cancer Res. 1967 Feb;27(2):209-20
pubmed: 6018555
BMC Genet. 2010 Oct 15;11:94
pubmed: 20950446
Bioinformatics. 2010 Feb 1;26(3):419-20
pubmed: 20080509
EXS. 1993;67:153-75
pubmed: 8400687
BMC Evol Biol. 2020 May 24;20(1):60
pubmed: 32448128
Am J Hum Genet. 1967 May;19(3 Pt 1):233-57
pubmed: 6026583
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jun 1;24(11):1403-5
pubmed: 18397895
Mol Ecol. 2012 Sep;21(18):4414-21
pubmed: 22564213
J Med Entomol. 2002 Jul;39(4):695-8
pubmed: 12144307
Oecologia. 2019 Apr;189(4):905-917
pubmed: 30877577
Waste Manag. 2016 Jan;47(Pt A):84-90
pubmed: 25872864
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2019 Dec;36:74-81
pubmed: 31539788
Mol Ecol. 2015 May;24(9):2277-97
pubmed: 25474505
J Sci Food Agric. 2017 Jun;97(8):2594-2600
pubmed: 27734508
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 18;92(15):6723-7
pubmed: 7624310
Bioinformatics. 2014 Apr 15;30(8):1187-1189
pubmed: 24389659
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jul 07;11:1538
pubmed: 32774330
Front Genet. 2015 Jun 10;6:208
pubmed: 26113860
Environ Entomol. 2017 Dec 8;46(6):1415-1423
pubmed: 29040452
Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370
pubmed: 28563791
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 24;106(12):4758-63
pubmed: 19273852
Poult Sci. 2021 Apr;100(4):101034
pubmed: 33662662
Genome Biol Evol. 2018 Jan 1;10(1):276-290
pubmed: 29325102
Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Dec;31(12):3148-63
pubmed: 25158796
Anim Genet. 2020 Oct;51(5):752-762
pubmed: 32524667
Mol Biol Evol. 2020 Apr 1;37(4):1056-1069
pubmed: 31808937
Heredity (Edinb). 2016 Sep;117(3):125-34
pubmed: 27273325
J Environ Manage. 2017 Jul 1;196:458-465
pubmed: 28342340