Impact of 360° vs 2D Videos on Engagement in Anatomy Education.
360 video
anatomy
engagement
medical education
online learning
technology
virtual reality
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Apr 2021
02 Apr 2021
Historique:
entrez:
6
5
2021
pubmed:
7
5
2021
medline:
7
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Medical education is constantly evolving, especially as students were forced to study from home during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and new technologies have driven the rapid development of supplemental online educational resources. In this study, we examine if 360° videos can promote increased engagement over standard two-dimensional (2D) videos among medical students learning anatomy. We enrolled 39 fourth-year medical students to watch two four-minute videos of anatomy lab exercises in a 360° three-dimensional format using an immersive headset or in a 2D format on a laptop computer. Every two minutes, students were asked to rate their engagement from 0-100. Following the videos, they reported their degree of agreement with 14 statements related to engagement, practicality, and interest in the technology. While watching the videos, the average engagement reported by the 360° video group was higher at each time point than the engagement reported by the two-dimensional group. Further, the engagement remained high in the 360° group through the six- and eight-minute timepoints. In the post-video survey, the 360° group reported a statistically significantly higher average engagement in seven of eight measures on the assessment. A 360° video was rated as more practical and interesting than a two-dimensional video. No significant difference existed in the perceived ease of learning. Overall, the use of 360° video may improve engagement for short videos used in medical education. However, developing a better understanding of its impact on learning outcomes will be critical for determining the overall value and effectiveness of this tool.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33954071
doi: 10.7759/cureus.14260
pmc: PMC8088777
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e14260Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021, Chan et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2131-2132
pubmed: 32232420
Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1666538
pubmed: 31526248
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 May;18(5):370-6
pubmed: 12795736
Can Med Educ J. 2020 Mar 16;11(1):e81-e96
pubmed: 32215146
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):188-192
pubmed: 28599897
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4174-83
pubmed: 26905573
Acad Med. 2006 Mar;81(3):207-12
pubmed: 16501260
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2018 Jul;6(3):123-129
pubmed: 30013996
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 May 15;15:10824
pubmed: 31161136
Acad Med. 2002 Oct;77(10 Suppl):S86-93
pubmed: 12377715
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019 Oct;24(4):811-825
pubmed: 30456474
J Surg Educ. 2018 Jul - Aug;75(4):993-1000
pubmed: 29122571
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2014 Jul;44(6):137-40
pubmed: 24981662
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020 Jul;8(3):140-143
pubmed: 32802908