Social Determinants of Adherence to COVID-19 Risk Mitigation Measures Among Adults With Cardiovascular Disease.
cardiovascular diseases
physical distancing
self-report
social determinants of health
vaccination
Journal
Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes
ISSN: 1941-7705
Titre abrégé: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101489148
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
7
5
2021
medline:
19
8
2021
entrez:
6
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Social determinants of health (SDOH) may limit the practice of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) risk mitigation guidelines with health implications for individuals with underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD). Population-based evidence of the association between SDOH and practicing such mitigation strategies in adults with CVD is lacking. We used the National Opinion Research Center's COVID-19 Household Impact Survey conducted between April and June 2020 to evaluate sociodemographic disparities in adherence to COVID-19 risk mitigation measures in a sample of respondents with underlying CVD representing 18 geographic areas of the United States. CVD status was ascertained by self-reported history of receiving heart disease, heart attack, or stroke diagnosis. We built de novo, a cumulative index of SDOH burden using education, insurance, economic stability, 30-day food security, urbanicity, neighborhood quality, and integration. We described the practice of measures under the broad strategies of personal protection (mask, hand hygiene, and physical distancing), social distancing (avoiding crowds, restaurants, social activities, and high-risk contact), and work flexibility (work from home, canceling/postponing work). We reported prevalence ratios and 95% CIs for the association between SDOH burden (quartiles of cumulative indices) and practicing these measures adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidity, and interview wave. Two thousand thirty-six of 25 269 (7.0%) adults, representing 8.69 million in 18 geographic areas of the United States, reported underlying CVD. Compared with the least SDOH burden, fewer individuals with the greatest SDOH burden practiced all personal protection (75.6% versus 89.0%) and social distancing measures (41.9% versus 58.9%) and had any flexible work schedule (26.2% versus 41.4%). These associations remained statistically significant after full adjustment: personal protection (prevalence ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.73-0.96]; SDOH burden is associated with lower COVID-19 risk mitigation practices in the CVD population. Identifying and prioritizing individuals whose medical vulnerability is compounded by social adversity may optimize emerging preventive efforts, including vaccination guidelines.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Social determinants of health (SDOH) may limit the practice of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) risk mitigation guidelines with health implications for individuals with underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD). Population-based evidence of the association between SDOH and practicing such mitigation strategies in adults with CVD is lacking. We used the National Opinion Research Center's COVID-19 Household Impact Survey conducted between April and June 2020 to evaluate sociodemographic disparities in adherence to COVID-19 risk mitigation measures in a sample of respondents with underlying CVD representing 18 geographic areas of the United States.
METHODS
CVD status was ascertained by self-reported history of receiving heart disease, heart attack, or stroke diagnosis. We built de novo, a cumulative index of SDOH burden using education, insurance, economic stability, 30-day food security, urbanicity, neighborhood quality, and integration. We described the practice of measures under the broad strategies of personal protection (mask, hand hygiene, and physical distancing), social distancing (avoiding crowds, restaurants, social activities, and high-risk contact), and work flexibility (work from home, canceling/postponing work). We reported prevalence ratios and 95% CIs for the association between SDOH burden (quartiles of cumulative indices) and practicing these measures adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidity, and interview wave.
RESULTS
Two thousand thirty-six of 25 269 (7.0%) adults, representing 8.69 million in 18 geographic areas of the United States, reported underlying CVD. Compared with the least SDOH burden, fewer individuals with the greatest SDOH burden practiced all personal protection (75.6% versus 89.0%) and social distancing measures (41.9% versus 58.9%) and had any flexible work schedule (26.2% versus 41.4%). These associations remained statistically significant after full adjustment: personal protection (prevalence ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.73-0.96];
CONCLUSIONS
SDOH burden is associated with lower COVID-19 risk mitigation practices in the CVD population. Identifying and prioritizing individuals whose medical vulnerability is compounded by social adversity may optimize emerging preventive efforts, including vaccination guidelines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33955228
doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008118
pmc: PMC8204764
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e008118Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
J Cardiol. 2020 Nov;76(5):453-458
pubmed: 32736906
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 11;10(8):e039849
pubmed: 32784264
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Oct 1;26(10):e312-e318
pubmed: 33094943
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Jul 16;17:E63
pubmed: 32678061
JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1891-1892
pubmed: 32293639
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Jul 14;29:100583
pubmed: 32715080
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 May 18;72(10):e604-e607
pubmed: 32918071
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020 Sep;17(9):543-558
pubmed: 32690910
JAMA. 2020 Aug 4;324(5):510-513
pubmed: 32609307
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Mar;174(3):362-373
pubmed: 33253040
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 02;:
pubmed: 32877921
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 1;72(11):e695-e703
pubmed: 32945846
Health Lit Res Pract. 2020 Aug 6;4(3):e161-e165
pubmed: 32926171
Am J Mens Health. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):1557988320954021
pubmed: 32936693
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;26(7):1592-1595
pubmed: 32284092
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528
pubmed: 30700139
J Rehabil Med. 2020 May 25;52(5):jrm00063
pubmed: 32449782
Prev Med. 2020 Dec;141:106282
pubmed: 33035550
Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:393-412
pubmed: 17173539
Stat Med. 2016 Dec 30;35(30):5730-5735
pubmed: 27460748
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1294-1302
pubmed: 33144713
Health Lit Res Pract. 2020 Aug 6;4(3):e166-e170
pubmed: 32926172
JAMA. 2020 Nov 24;324(20):2100-2102
pubmed: 33044514
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 May;94:91-95
pubmed: 32173574
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):1973-1987
pubmed: 32497510
Front Public Health. 2020 Jul 21;8:406
pubmed: 32793544
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Jul;8(7):659-661
pubmed: 32437646
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Feb 29;12:21
pubmed: 22375553
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243028
pubmed: 33270701
Occup Environ Med. 1998 Apr;55(4):272-7
pubmed: 9624282