Efficacy of a tight-control and treat-to-target strategy in axial spondyloarthritis: results of the open-label, pragmatic, cluster-randomised TICOSPA trial.
ankylosing
healthcare
outcome and process assessment
spondylitis
therapeutics
Journal
Annals of the rheumatic diseases
ISSN: 1468-2060
Titre abrégé: Ann Rheum Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
24
11
2020
revised:
16
04
2021
accepted:
18
04
2021
pubmed:
8
5
2021
medline:
23
11
2021
entrez:
7
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the benefits of a tight-control/treat-to-target strategy (TC/T2T) in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) with those of usual care (UC). Pragmatic, prospective, cluster-randomised, controlled, open, 1-year trial (NCT03043846). 18 centres were randomised (1:1). Patients met Axial Spondylo Arthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for axSpA, had an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) ≥2.1, received non-optimal treatment by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and were biologic-naive. (1) Percentage of patients with a ≥30% improvement on the ASAS-Health Index (ASAS-HI). Other efficacy outcomes and adverse events were recorded. A health economic evaluation was performed. Two-level mixed models were used to estimate efficacy outcomes. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for TC/T2T versus UC. 160 patients were included (80/group). Mean (SD) age was 37.9 (11.0) years and disease duration was 3.7 (6.2) years; 51.2% were men. ASDAS at inclusion was 3.0 (0.7), and ASAS-HI was 8.6 (3.7). ASAS-HI improved by ≥30% in 47.3% of the TC/T2T arm and in 36.1% of those receiving UC (non-significant). All secondary efficacy outcomes were more frequent in the TC/T2T arm, although not all statistically significant. Safety was similar in both arms. From a societal perspective, TC/T2T resulted in an additional 0.04 QALY, and saved €472 compared with UC. TC/T2T was not significantly superior to UC for the primary outcome, while many secondary efficacy outcomes favoured it, had a similar safety profile and was favourable from a societal health economic perspective. NCT03043846.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33958325
pii: annrheumdis-2020-219585
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219585
pmc: PMC8522451
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Biological Products
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03043846']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Pragmatic Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1436-1444Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: Dr van Tubergen reports grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants from Pfizer, grants from UCB, grants from Biogen, grants from AbbVie, outside the submitted work. Dr van der Heijde reports personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB Pharma, outside the submitted work; and Director of Imaging Rheumatology bv. Dr van Gaalen reports grants from Stichting vrienden van Sole Mio, grants from Stichting ASAS, grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants from UCB, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, outside the submitted work. AB received a research grant to her department from AbbVie, consultation fees from Eli Lilly and Galapagos and a speakers fee from UCB, all paid to her department. Dr Van den Bosch reports personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Celgene, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from Galapagos, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from UCB, outside the submitted work. Dr Claudepierre reports personal fees from Roche Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, grants from Roche Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, MSD, AbbVie, Lilly, Celgene, Janssen, BMS, outside the submitted work. Dr Molto reports grants from UCB during the conduct of the study; personal fees from AbbVie, grants and personal fees from UCB, personal fees from BMS, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Gilead, personal fees from Lilly, outside the submitted work. Dr Gossec reports grants from Amgen, Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi, Galapagos, personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Biogen, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, outside the submitted work. Dr Dougados reports grants from UCB, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from AbbVie, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Lilly, grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Roche, grants and personal fees from BMS, grants and personal fees from Merck, outside the submitted work. Dr Dernis, Dr Ruyssen-Witrand, Dr Lenaerts, Dr Lopez-Medina, Dr Sparsa, Dr Starmans-Kool, Dr C Webers, Dr Pouplin, Dr Soubrier and Dr Joos have nothing to declare.
Références
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Feb;70(2):249-51
pubmed: 20829199
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Jan 30;21(1):41
pubmed: 30700326
BMC Health Serv Res. 2004 Nov 18;4(1):33
pubmed: 15550169
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Oct;77(10):1539-1540
pubmed: 29453216
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 15;363(3):233-44
pubmed: 20587587
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jan;68(1):18-24
pubmed: 18625618
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):6-16
pubmed: 23749611
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Oct;51(10):1894-905
pubmed: 22772319
Lancet. 2020 May 9;395(10235):1496-1505
pubmed: 32386593
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Jun;63(6):665-70
pubmed: 15037444
RMD Open. 2019 May 21;5(1):e000872
pubmed: 31245046
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 1;375(9):861-70
pubmed: 27579636
Lancet. 2015 Dec 19;386(10012):2489-98
pubmed: 26433318
Med Decis Making. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):350-61
pubmed: 22016450
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jun;75(6):965-73
pubmed: 26984008
J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2286-91
pubmed: 7699630
Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2763-2774
pubmed: 27863807
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Apr;49(4):812-9
pubmed: 20100797
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 May;74(5):830-5
pubmed: 24399232
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Nov;63(11):1438-44
pubmed: 15044211
J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2281-5
pubmed: 7699629
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):777-83
pubmed: 19297344
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Jan;65(1):28-38
pubmed: 23169319
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jan;70(1):47-53
pubmed: 21068095
JAMA. 2015 May 26;313(20):2068-9
pubmed: 26010636
Lancet. 2004 Jul 17-23;364(9430):263-9
pubmed: 15262104
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Jan;35(1):66-71
pubmed: 8624626
Health Econ. 2004 May;13(5):461-75
pubmed: 15127426
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):238-42
pubmed: 23740234
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Jun 30;11:102
pubmed: 21718530
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):978-991
pubmed: 28087505
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16
pubmed: 26551272