Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the psychomotor, cognitive, and motor performances of power athletes.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 05 2021
06 05 2021
Historique:
received:
01
11
2020
accepted:
19
04
2021
entrez:
7
5
2021
pubmed:
8
5
2021
medline:
29
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In sports science, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has many unknown effects on neuromuscular, psychomotor and cognitive aspects. Particularly, its impact on power performances remains poorly investigated. Eighteen healthy young males, all trained in a jumping sport (parkour) performed three experimental sessions: anodal tDCS applied either on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC, cathode in supraorbital area) or on the primary motor cortex (M1, cathode on contralateral shoulder), and a placebo condition (SHAM), each applied for 20 min at 2 mA. Pre and post, maximal vertical and horizontal jumps were performed, associated to leg neuromuscular assessment through electromyography and peripheral nerve stimulations. Actual and imagined pointing tasks were also performed to evaluate fine motor skills, and a full battery of cognitive and psychomotor tests was administered. M1 tDCS improved jump performance accompanied by an increase in supraspinal and spinal excitabilities. dlPFC stimulation only impacted the pointing tasks. No effect on cognitive tests was found for any of the tDCS conditions. To conclude, the type of performance (maximal versus accurate) affected depended upon the tDCS montage. Finally, athletes responded well to tDCS for motor performance while results to cognitive tests seemed unaffected, at least when implemented with the present rationale.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33958679
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89159-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-89159-7
pmc: PMC8102586
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9731Références
Nitsche, M. A. & Paulus, W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J. Physiol. 527, 633–639 (2000).
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x
Angius, L., Pascual-Leone, A. & Santarnecchi, E. Brain stimulation and physical performance. In Progress in Brain Research Vol. 240 317–339 (Elsevier B.V., 2018).
Cogiamanian, F., Marceglia, S., Ardolino, G., Barbieri, S. & Priori, A. Improved isometric force endurance after transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortical areas. Eur. J. Neurosci. 26, 242–249 (2007).
doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05633.x
Angius, L., Pageaux, B., Hopker, J., Marcora, S. M. & Mauger, A. R. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves isometric time to exhaustion of the knee extensors. Neuroscience 339, 363–375 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.10.028
Williams, P. S., Hoffman, R. L. & Clark, B. C. Preliminary evidence that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a sustained submaximal contraction. PLoS ONE 8, e81418 (2013).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081418
Okano, A. H. et al. Brain stimulation modulates the autonomic nervous system, rating of perceived exertion and performance during maximal exercise. Br. J. Sports Med. 49, 1213–1218 (2015).
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091658
Vitor-Costa, M. et al. Improving cycling performance: Transcranial direct current stimulation increases time to exhaustion in cycling. PLoS One 10 (2015).
Oki, K. et al. Preliminary evidence that excitatory transcranial direct current stimulation extends time to task failure of a sustained, submaximal muscular contraction in older adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 71, 1109–1112 (2016).
Dutta, A., Krishnan, C., Kantak, S. S., Ranganathan, R. & Nitsche, M. A. Recurrence quantification analysis of surface electromyogram supports alterations in motor unit recruitment strategies by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 33, 663–669 (2015).
Krishnan, C., Ranganathan, R., Kantak, S. S., Dhaher, Y. Y. & Rymer, W. Z. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation alters elbow flexor muscle recruitment strategies. Brain Stimul. 7, 443–450 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.01.057
Lang, N., Nitsche, M. A., Paulus, W., Rothwell, J. C. & Lemon, R. N. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability. Exp. Brain Res. 156, 439–443 (2004).
doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1800-2
Lattari, E. et al. Can transcranial direct current stimulation improve muscle power in individuals with advanced resistance training experience? J. Strength Cond. Res. 1. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001956 (2017).
Romero-Arenas, S. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation does not improve countermovement jump performance in young healthy men. J. Strength Cond. Res. 1. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003242 (2019).
Mesquita, P. H. C., Lage, G. M., Franchini, E., Romano-Silva, M. A. & Albuquerque, M. R. Bi-hemispheric anodal transcranial direct current stimulation worsens taekwondo-related performance. Hum. Mov. Sci. 66, 578–586 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.003
Dockery, C. A., Hueckel-Weng, R., Birbaumer, N. & Plewnia, C. Enhancement of planning ability by transcranial direct current stimulation. J. Neurosci. 29, 7271–7277 (2009).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0065-09.2009
Zaehle, T., Sandmann, P., Thorne, J. D., Jäncke, L. & Herrmann, C. S. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex modulates working memory performance: Combined behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. BMC Neurosci. 12 (2011).
Grosprêtre, S. & Lepers, R. Performance characteristics of Parkour practitioners: Who are the traceurs?. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 16, 526–535 (2016).
doi: 10.1080/17461391.2015.1060263
Grosprêtre, S., Gimenez, P. & Martin, A. Neuromuscular and electromechanical properties of ultra-power athletes: The traceurs. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 118, 1361–1371 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3868-1
Grandperrin, Y. et al. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on sports performance for two profiles of athletes (power and endurance) (COMPETE): A protocol for a randomised, crossover, double blind, controlled exploratory trial. Trials 21 (2020).
Grosprêtre, S., Ufland, P. & Jecker, D. The adaptation to standing long jump distance in parkour is performed by the modulation of specific variables prior and during take-off. Mov. Sport Sci. Sci. Mot. https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2017022 (2017).
doi: 10.1051/sm/2017022
Rozand, V., Lebon, F., Stapley, P. J., Papaxanthis, C. & Lepers, R. A prolonged motor imagery session alter imagined and actual movement durations: Potential implications for neurorehabilitation. Behav. Brain Res. 297, 67–75 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.09.036
Treadway, M. T., Buckholtz, J. W., Schwartzman, A. N., Lambert, W. E. & Zald, D. H. Worth the ‘EEfRT’? The effort expenditure for rewards task as an objective measure of motivation and anhedonia. PLoS One 4 (2009).
Lejuez, C. W. et al. Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The balloon analogue risk task (BART). J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 8, 75–84 (2002).
doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75
Dubois, B., Slachevsky, A., Litvan, I. & Pillon, B. The FAB: A frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology 55, 1621–1626 (2000).
doi: 10.1212/WNL.55.11.1621
Godefroy, O. et al. The dysexecutive syndrome of Alzheimer’s disease: The GREFEX study. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 42, 1203–1208 (2014).
doi: 10.3233/JAD-140585
Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M. & Bickel, W. K. Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 128, 78–87 (1999).
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.128.1.78
Machado, S., Jansen, P., Almeida, V. & Veldema, J. Is tDCS an adjunct ergogenic resource for improving muscular strength and endurance performance? A systematic review. Front. Psychol. 10 (2019).
Jeffery, D. T., Norton, J. A., Roy, F. D. & Gorassini, M. A. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 182, 281–287 (2007).
doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1093-y
Roche, N., Lackmy, A., Achache, V., Bussel, B. & Katz, R. Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on spinal network excitability in humans. J. Physiol. 587, 5653–5664 (2009).
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.177550
Teti Mayer, J. et al. Can transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) improve impulsivity in healthy and psychiatric adult populations? A systematic review. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 98 (2020).
Russell, M. J. et al. Sex and electrode configuration in transcranial electrical stimulation. Front. Psychiatry 8 (2017).
Rozand, V., Lebon, F., Papaxanthis, C. & Lepers, R. Effect of mental fatigue on speed-accuracy trade-off. Neuroscience 297, 219–230 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.03.066
Jeannerod, M. Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0832 (2001).
doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
Decety, J. et al. Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature 371, 600–602 (1994).
doi: 10.1038/371600a0
Munzert, J., Lorey, B. & Zentgraf, K. Cognitive motor processes: The role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations. Brain Res. Rev. 60, 306–326 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.024
Wolpert, D. M. & Flanagan, J. R. Motor prediction. Curr. Biol. CB 11 (2001).
Moghadas Tabrizi, Y., Yavari, M., Shahrbanian, S. & Gharayagh Zandi, H. Transcranial direct current stimulation on prefrontal and parietal areas enhances motor imagery. Neuroreport 30, 653–657 (2019).
Priori, A. Brain polarization in humans: A reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged non-invasive modulation of brain excitability. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114, 589–595 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00437-6
López-Alonso, V., Cheeran, B., Río-Rodríguez, D. & Fernández-Del-Olmo, M. Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimul. 7, 372–380 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.004
Li, L. M., Uehara, K. & Hanakawa, T. The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 9, 181 (2015).
doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00181
Martin, A. et al. The etiology of muscle fatigue differs between two electrical stimulation protocols. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000930 (2016).
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000930
Montenegro, R. et al. Motor cortex tDCS does not improve strength performance in healthy subjects. Motriz. Rev. Educ. Fis. 21, 185–193 (2015).
doi: 10.1590/S1980-65742015000200009
Aagaard, P., Simonsen, E. B., Andersen, J. L., Magnusson, P. & Dyhre-Poulsen, P. Neural adaptation to resistance training: changes in evoked V-wave and H-reflex responses. J. Appl. Physiol. 92, 2309–2318 (2002).
doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01185.2001
Ardolino, G., Bossi, B., Barbieri, S. & Priori, A. Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain. J. Physiol. 568, 653–663 (2005).
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.088310
Nitsche, M. A. & Paulus, W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 57, 1899–1901 (2001).
doi: 10.1212/WNL.57.10.1899
Maffiuletti, N. A. et al. Rate of force development: Physiological and methodological considerations. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 116, 1091–1116 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3346-6
Lackmy-Vallée, A., Klomjai, W., Bussel, B., Katz, R. & Roche, N. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex induces opposite modulation of reciprocal inhibition in wrist extensor and flexor. J. Neurophysiol. 112, 1505–1515 (2014).
doi: 10.1152/jn.00249.2013
Roche, N., Lackmy, A., Achache, V., Bussel, B. & Katz, R. Effects of anodal tDCS on lumbar propriospinal system in healthy subjects. Clin. Neurophysiol. 123, 1027–1034 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.09.011
Roche, N., Lackmy, A., Achache, V., Bussel, B. & Katz, R. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the leg motor area on lumbar spinal network excitability in healthy subjects. J. Physiol. 589, 2813–2826 (2011).
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.205161
Grosprêtre, S., Lebon, F., Papaxanthis, C. & Martin, A. Spinal plasticity with motor imagery practice. J. Physiol. 597, 921–934 (2019).
doi: 10.1113/JP276694
Grosprêtre, S., Bouguetoch, A. & Martin, A. Cortical and spinal excitabilities are differently balanced in power athletes. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2019.1633414 (2019).
Hale, J. B. & Fiorello, C. A. School Neuropsychology : A Practitioner’s Handbook. (Guilford Press, 2004).
Pochon, J.-B. The role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the preparation of forthcoming actions: An fMRI study. Cereb. Cortex 11, 260–266 (2001).
doi: 10.1093/cercor/11.3.260
Hanakawa, T., Dimyan, M. A. & Hallett, M. Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: A time-course study with functional MRI. Cereb. Cortex 18, 2775–2788 (2008).
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn036
Nitsche, M. A. et al. Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. J. Physiol. 553, 293–301 (2003).
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049916
Tanaka, S., Hanakawa, T., Honda, M. & Watanabe, K. Enhancement of pinch force in the lower leg by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Exp. Brain Res. 196, 459–465 (2009).
doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1863-9
Morales-Quezada, L. et al. Behavioral effects of transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS): Speed-accuracy tradeoff in attention switching task. Neurosci. Res. 109, 48–53 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2016.01.009
Oldfield, R. C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9, 97–113 (1971).
doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
Gandiga, P. C., Hummel, F. C. & Cohen, L. G. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 117, 845–850 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003
Barratt, E. S. Factor analysis of some psychometric measures of impulsiveness and anxiety. Psychol. Rep. 16, 547–554 (1965).
Rush, A. J. et al. The 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): A psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol. Psychiatry 54, 573–583 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01866-8