Inspection of the lens thickness with preoperative biometric measurements prevents an erroneous interpretation of posterior capsule during FLACS.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 05 2021
06 05 2021
Historique:
received:
21
12
2020
accepted:
20
04
2021
entrez:
7
5
2021
pubmed:
8
5
2021
medline:
29
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Optical opacity reduces quality of biometry images, making it potentially difficult to find the correct location for irradiation during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS). After experiencing a case of posterior capsule (PC) rupture because of optical opacity, we started lens thickness (LT) inspection, which indicates comparison of between intra- and pre-operatively measured LT. We retrospectively investigated the effectiveness of the LT inspection. One observer reviewed all FLACS treatment summaries for 3 years by CATALYS in the Jikei University Hospital, Tokyo. Based on the lines defining the PC on intraoperative OCT images, all cases were classified into three groups: undescribed, appropriate and inappropriate PC. Among the 1070 cases, 1047 cases had appropriate PC. In 19 cases, the PC line was undescribed because of dense cataract. Among 474 cases with no inspection, 4 cases had an inappropriate PC. Whereas, in 596 cases with the LT inspection, there was no case of an inappropriate PC. LT inspection significantly reduced the cases with inappropriate PC. The safety margins normally work to prevent severe complications. However, rare outlier cases had a high risk of severe complications. We propose LT inspection could be the most practical and convenient way for safety surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33958690
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89209-0
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-89209-0
pmc: PMC8102511
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9702Références
J Refract Surg. 2015 Dec;31(12):821-5
pubmed: 26653727
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Aug;45(8):1168-1171
pubmed: 31126782
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 21;10(1):3134
pubmed: 32081868
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Oct;250(10):1549-51
pubmed: 22695937
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020 Jun 30;19:100811
pubmed: 32642600
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Nov;37(11):2068-70
pubmed: 21940142
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Dec;44(12):1463-1468
pubmed: 30279088
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Nov;39(11):1753-63
pubmed: 24160384
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;258(1):137-146
pubmed: 31631237
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Jan;39(1):22-27
pubmed: 23245360
Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb 04;13:253-260
pubmed: 30787590
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Jan;40(1):20-8
pubmed: 24355719
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Nov 17;2(58):58ra85
pubmed: 21084720