The Smartphone App haMSter for Tracking Patient-Reported Outcomes in People With Multiple Sclerosis: Protocol for a Pilot Study.

mHealth mobile health multiple sclerosis patient-reported outcomes remote monitoring telemedicine

Journal

JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 May 2021
Historique:
received: 15 10 2020
accepted: 09 03 2021
revised: 09 02 2021
entrez: 7 5 2021
pubmed: 8 5 2021
medline: 8 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Treatment and monitoring decisions in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) are based commonly on clinician-reported outcomes. These reflect physical and radiological disease activity and are the most relevant endpoints in clinical trials. Over the past few years, the number of studies evaluating so-called patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been increasing. PROs are reports from patients concerning their own health perception. They are typically obtained by means of questionnaires and aim to quantify symptoms such as fatigue, depression, and sexual dysfunction. The emergence of PROs has made a tremendous contribution to understanding the individual impact of disease in people with MS and their health-related quality of life. However, the assessment of PROs consumes resources, including time and personnel. Thus, useful ways to conveniently introduce PROs into clinical practice are needed. We aim to provide a rationale and pilot study protocol for a mobile health (mHealth) solution named "haMSter" that allows for remote monitoring of PROs in people with MS. The core function of haMSter is to provide three scientifically validated PRO questionnaires relevant to MS for patients to fill out at home once a month. Thereby, longitudinal and remote documentation of PROs is enabled. A scoring algorithm graphically plots PRO scores over time and makes them available at the next visit. The pilot study is currently ongoing and will evaluate adherence to this mHealth solution in 50 patients over a period of 6 months. Results from the haMSter pilot study are expected in 2021. haMSter is a novel mHealth-based solution for modern PRO research, which may constitute the first step in achieving the ability to integrate PROs in clinical practice. This allows for a more problem-oriented approach in monitoring visits, which addresses patient needs and ultimately saves time. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04555863; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04555863. DERR1-10.2196/25011.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Treatment and monitoring decisions in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) are based commonly on clinician-reported outcomes. These reflect physical and radiological disease activity and are the most relevant endpoints in clinical trials. Over the past few years, the number of studies evaluating so-called patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been increasing. PROs are reports from patients concerning their own health perception. They are typically obtained by means of questionnaires and aim to quantify symptoms such as fatigue, depression, and sexual dysfunction. The emergence of PROs has made a tremendous contribution to understanding the individual impact of disease in people with MS and their health-related quality of life. However, the assessment of PROs consumes resources, including time and personnel. Thus, useful ways to conveniently introduce PROs into clinical practice are needed.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
We aim to provide a rationale and pilot study protocol for a mobile health (mHealth) solution named "haMSter" that allows for remote monitoring of PROs in people with MS.
METHODS METHODS
The core function of haMSter is to provide three scientifically validated PRO questionnaires relevant to MS for patients to fill out at home once a month. Thereby, longitudinal and remote documentation of PROs is enabled. A scoring algorithm graphically plots PRO scores over time and makes them available at the next visit.
RESULTS RESULTS
The pilot study is currently ongoing and will evaluate adherence to this mHealth solution in 50 patients over a period of 6 months. Results from the haMSter pilot study are expected in 2021.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
haMSter is a novel mHealth-based solution for modern PRO research, which may constitute the first step in achieving the ability to integrate PROs in clinical practice. This allows for a more problem-oriented approach in monitoring visits, which addresses patient needs and ultimately saves time.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04555863; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04555863.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) UNASSIGNED
DERR1-10.2196/25011.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33960949
pii: v10i5e25011
doi: 10.2196/25011
pmc: PMC8140378
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04555863']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e25011

Informations de copyright

©Patrick Altmann, Werner Hinterberger, Fritz Leutmezer, Markus Ponleitner, Tobias Monschein, Tobias Zrzavy, Gudrun Zulehner, Barbara Kornek, Rupert Lanzenberger, Klaus Berek, Paulus Stefan Rommer, Thomas Berger, Gabriel Bsteh. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 07.05.2021.

Références

Eur J Neurol. 2019 Jan;26(1):27-40
pubmed: 30300457
Neurology. 2014 Sep 9;83(11):1022-4
pubmed: 25200713
Nat Rev Neurol. 2018 Feb;14(2):75-93
pubmed: 29326424
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Feb;17(2):162-173
pubmed: 29275977
Acta Neurol Scand. 2013 Aug;128(2):114-21
pubmed: 23398571
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6(5):278-84
pubmed: 11070589
Eur J Neurol. 2017 Sep;24(9):1099-1107
pubmed: 28695634
BMJ. 2013 Jan 08;346:e7586
pubmed: 23303884
J Vis Exp. 2014 Jun 30;(88):e51318
pubmed: 25046650
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2015 Jun;2(6):679-87
pubmed: 26125042
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 30;21(8):e14863
pubmed: 31471961
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Apr 24;5(1):e5
pubmed: 29691208
Mult Scler. 2017 Jul;23(8):1123-1136
pubmed: 28273775
Neurotherapeutics. 2017 Oct;14(4):934-944
pubmed: 28913785
Ann Neurol. 2016 Oct;80(4):499-510
pubmed: 27464262
Eur J Neurol. 2020 Mar;27(3):429-436
pubmed: 31538396
Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52
pubmed: 6685237

Auteurs

Patrick Altmann (P)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Werner Hinterberger (W)

CAKE Communications, Vienna, Austria.

Fritz Leutmezer (F)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Markus Ponleitner (M)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Tobias Monschein (T)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Tobias Zrzavy (T)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Gudrun Zulehner (G)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Barbara Kornek (B)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Rupert Lanzenberger (R)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Klaus Berek (K)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Paulus Stefan Rommer (PS)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Thomas Berger (T)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Gabriel Bsteh (G)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Classifications MeSH