Identification of patients at risk for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with intra-operative frozen section.
Aged
Follow-Up Studies
Frozen Sections
Humans
Intraoperative Period
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Margins of Excision
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ blood
Proportional Hazards Models
Prostate-Specific Antigen
/ blood
Prostatectomy
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ blood
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
biochemical recurrence
frozen section
outcome
prostate cancer
radical prostatectomy
Journal
BJU international
ISSN: 1464-410X
Titre abrégé: BJU Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100886721
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
8
5
2021
medline:
4
1
2022
entrez:
7
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To identify patients at risk for biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP) with intra-operative whole-mount frozen section (FS) of the prostate. We examined differences in BCR between patients with initial negative surgical margins at FS, patients with final negative surgical margins with initial positive margins at FS without residual PCa after secondary tumour resection, and patients with final negative surgical margins with initially positive margins at FS with residual PCa in the secondary tumour resection specimen. Institutional data of 883 consecutive patients undergoing RP were collected. Intra-operative whole-mount FS was routinely used to check for margin status and, if necessary, to resect more periprostatic tissue in order to achieve negative margins. Patients with lymph node-positive disease or final positive surgical margins were excluded from the analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses adjusting for clinical covariates were employed to examine differences in biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) according to the resection status mentioned above. The median follow-up was 22.4 months. The 1- and 2-year BRFS rates in patients with (81.0% and 72.9%, respectively; P = 0.001) and without residual PCa (90.3% and 82.3%, respectively; P = 0.033) after secondary tumour resection were significantly lower compared to patients with initial R0 status (93.4% and 90.9%, respectively). On multivariable Cox regression only residual PCa in the secondary tumour resection was associated with a higher risk of BCR compared to initial R0 status (hazard ratio 1.99, 95% confidence interval 1.01-3.92; P = 0.046). Despite being classified as having a negative surgical margin, patients with residual PCa in the secondary tumour resection specimen face a high risk of BCR. These findings warrant closer post-RP surveillance of this particular subgroup. Further research of this high-risk subset of patients should focus on examining whether these patients benefit from early salvage therapy and how resection status impacts oncological outcomes in the changing landscape of PCa treatment.
Substances chimiques
Prostate-Specific Antigen
EC 3.4.21.77
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
598-606Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.
Références
Bianco FJ Jr, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ("trifecta"). Urology 2005; 66: 83-94
Swanson GP, Riggs M, Hermans M. Pathologic findings at radical prostatectomy: risk factors for failure and death. Urol Oncol 2007; 25: 110-4
Silberstein JL, Eastham JA. Significance and management of positive surgical margins at the time of radical prostatectomy. Indian J Urol 2014; 30: 423-8
von Bodman C, Brock M, Roghmann F et␣al. Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate decreases positive margin rate while ensuring nerve sparing procedure during radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2013; 190: 515-20
Schlomm T, Tennstedt P, Huxhold C et␣al. Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) increases nerve-sparing frequency and reduces positive surgical margins in open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 11,069 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 333-40
Van den Broeck T, van den Bergh RCN, Arfi N et␣al. Prognostic value of biochemical recurrence following treatment with curative intent for prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2019; 75: 967-87
Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL et␣al. Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel␣report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol 2007; 177: 540-5
Simmons MN, Stephenson AJ, Klein EA. Natural history of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: risk assessment for secondary therapy. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 1175-84
Han M, Partin AW, Zahurak M, Piantadosi S, Epstein JI, Walsh PC. Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2003; 169: 517-23
Brierley J, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. , Eighth edn, Chichester, West Sussex, UK; Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2017
Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VE, Humphrey PA. Contemporary Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: an update with discussion on practical issues to implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2017; 41: e1-7
Trinh Q-D, Bjartell A, Freedland SJ et␣al. A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2013; 64: 786-98
Noldus J, Michl U, Graefen M, Haese A, Hammerer P, Huland H. Patient-reported sexual function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 118-24
Michl U, Tennstedt P, Feldmeier L et␣al. Nerve-sparing surgery technique, not the preservation of the neurovascular bundles, leads to improved long-term continence rates after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2016; 69: 584-9
Gillitzer R, Thüroff C, Fandel T et␣al. Intraoperative peripheral frozen sections do not significantly affect prognosis after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. BJU Int 2011; 107: 755-9
Lepor H, Kaci L. Role of intraoperative biopsies during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2004; 63: 499-502
Heinrich E, Schon G, Schiefelbein F, Michel MS, Trojan L. Clinical impact of intraoperative frozen sections during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2010; 28: 709-13
Tsuboi T, Ohori M, Kuroiwa K et␣al. Is intraoperative frozen section analysis an efficient way to reduce positive surgical margins? Urology 2005; 66: 1287-91
Dinneen E, Haider A, Grierson J et␣al. NeuroSAFE frozen section during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): peri-operative and histopathological outcomes from the NeuroSAFE PROOF feasibility randomised controlled trial. BJU Int 2020; EPub ahead of print.
Pak S, Park S, Kim M, Go H, Cho YM, Ahn H. The impact on oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer of converting soft tissue margins at the apex and bladder neck from tumour-positive to -negative. BJU Int 2019; 123: 811-7
Iyengar P, Levy LB, Choi S, Lee AK, Kuban DA. Toxicity associated with postoperative radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2011; 34: 611-8
Baumgarten L, Borchert A, Sood A et␣al. Impact of timing on salvage radiation therapy adverse events following radical prostatectomy: a secondary analysis of the RTOG 9601 cohort. Urol Oncol 2019; 38: 38.e17-38.e22.
Nguyen C, Lairson DR, Swartz MD, Du XL. Risks of major long-term side effects associated with androgen-deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer. Pharmacotherapy 2018; 38: 999-1009
Andreoiu M, Cheng L. Multifocal prostate cancer: biologic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. Hum Pathol 2010; 41: 781-93
Loeb S, Schaeffer EM, Epstein JI. The vanishing prostate cancer phenomenon. Urology 2010; 76: 605-7
Messing EM, Tangen CM, Lerner SP et␣al. Effect of intravesical instillation of gemcitabine vs saline immediately following resection of suspected low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer on tumor recurrence: SWOG S0337 randomized clinical trial. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 2018; 319: 1880-8
Martini A, Gandaglia G, Fossati N et␣al. Defining clinically meaningful positive surgical margins in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2019; 4: 42-8.
Zhao Z, Weickmann S, Jung M et␣al. A novel predictor tool of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy based on a five-microRNA tissue signature. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11: 1603
Srougi V, Antunes AA, T S et␣al. Socioeconomic status is an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence among patients with prostate cancer who undergo radical prostatectomy. Int Braz J Urol 2011; 37: 507-13
Burchardt M, Engers R, Müller M et␣al. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading: evaluation using prostate cancer tissue microarrays. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2008; 134: 1071-8