Development and evaluation of a new measure of children's play: the Children's Play Scale (CPS).


Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 05 2021
Historique:
received: 17 09 2020
accepted: 12 04 2021
entrez: 8 5 2021
pubmed: 9 5 2021
medline: 14 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There is increasing recognition of the importance of children's play from a public health perspective, given the links between play and children's physical and mental health. The present research aimed to develop and evaluate a new parent-report questionnaire that measures the time children spend playing across a range of places and includes a supplement to evaluate how adventurously children play. The questionnaire was developed with input from a diverse group of parents and experts in children's play. It was designed to yield a range of metrics including time spent playing per year, time spent playing outside, time spent playing in nature and level of adventurous play. The reliability of the questionnaire was then evaluated with 245 parents (149 mothers, 96 fathers) of 154 children aged 5-11 years. All participants completed the measure at time 1. At time 2, an average of 20 days later, 184 parents (111 mothers and 73 fathers) of 99 children completed the measure again. Cross-informant agreement, evaluated using Concordance Correlation Coefficients (CCCs), ranged from 0.36 to 0.51. These fall in the poor to moderate range and are largely comparable to cross-informant agreement on other measures. Test-retest reliability for mothers was good (range 0.67-0.76) for time spent playing metrics. For fathers, test-retest reliability was lower (range 0.39-0.63). For both parents the average level of adventurous play variable had relatively poor test retest reliability (mothers = 0.49, fathers = 0.42). This variable also showed a significant increase from time 1 to time 2. This instability over time may be due to the timing of the research in relation to the Covid-19 lockdown and associated shifts in risk perception. The measure will be of value in future research focusing on the public health benefits and correlates of children's play as well as researchers interested in children's outdoor play and play in nature specifically. The development of the measure in collaboration with parents and experts in children's play is a significant strength. It will be of value for future research to further validate the measure against play diaries or activity monitors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
There is increasing recognition of the importance of children's play from a public health perspective, given the links between play and children's physical and mental health. The present research aimed to develop and evaluate a new parent-report questionnaire that measures the time children spend playing across a range of places and includes a supplement to evaluate how adventurously children play.
METHODS
The questionnaire was developed with input from a diverse group of parents and experts in children's play. It was designed to yield a range of metrics including time spent playing per year, time spent playing outside, time spent playing in nature and level of adventurous play. The reliability of the questionnaire was then evaluated with 245 parents (149 mothers, 96 fathers) of 154 children aged 5-11 years. All participants completed the measure at time 1. At time 2, an average of 20 days later, 184 parents (111 mothers and 73 fathers) of 99 children completed the measure again.
RESULTS
Cross-informant agreement, evaluated using Concordance Correlation Coefficients (CCCs), ranged from 0.36 to 0.51. These fall in the poor to moderate range and are largely comparable to cross-informant agreement on other measures. Test-retest reliability for mothers was good (range 0.67-0.76) for time spent playing metrics. For fathers, test-retest reliability was lower (range 0.39-0.63). For both parents the average level of adventurous play variable had relatively poor test retest reliability (mothers = 0.49, fathers = 0.42). This variable also showed a significant increase from time 1 to time 2. This instability over time may be due to the timing of the research in relation to the Covid-19 lockdown and associated shifts in risk perception.
CONCLUSIONS
The measure will be of value in future research focusing on the public health benefits and correlates of children's play as well as researchers interested in children's outdoor play and play in nature specifically. The development of the measure in collaboration with parents and experts in children's play is a significant strength. It will be of value for future research to further validate the measure against play diaries or activity monitors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33962587
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10812-x
pii: 10.1186/s12889-021-10812-x
pmc: PMC8103430
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

878

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S017909/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : UKRI
ID : MR/S017909/1

Références

Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2021 Mar;24(1):164-181
pubmed: 33464448
Prev Med. 2016 Dec;93:88-95
pubmed: 27658898
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;28(4):539-58
pubmed: 17854963
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Apr;158(4):353-7
pubmed: 15066875
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 17;16(2):
pubmed: 30658496
Inj Prev. 2018 Apr;24(2):106-112
pubmed: 28971856
Evol Psychol. 2011 Jun 21;9(2):257-84
pubmed: 22947972
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Jun 08;12(6):6475-505
pubmed: 26062040
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011 Oct;6 Suppl 2:57-9
pubmed: 21923299
Child Care Health Dev. 2014 Jan;40(1):68-76
pubmed: 22846064
J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Sep;12(5):579-82
pubmed: 19027361
Health Place. 2008 Jun;14(2):217-27
pubmed: 17662638
Health Promot Int. 2014 Mar;29(1):155-64
pubmed: 22907132
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Jun 08;12(6):6423-54
pubmed: 26062038
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 3;110(49):19742-7
pubmed: 24248341
Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Nov;32(11):1685-93
pubmed: 18852701
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2008 Dec;39(4):399-413
pubmed: 18266104
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Feb 02;7:11
pubmed: 20181061
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 May 14;53(6):2856-65
pubmed: 22491403

Auteurs

Helen F Dodd (HF)

School of Psychology and Clinical Language Science, University of Reading, Harry Pitt Building, Whiteknights Road, Earley Gate, Reading, RG6 6ES, UK. h.f.dodd@reading.ac.uk.

Rachel J Nesbit (RJ)

School of Psychology and Clinical Language Science, University of Reading, Harry Pitt Building, Whiteknights Road, Earley Gate, Reading, RG6 6ES, UK.

Laura R Maratchi (LR)

School of Psychology and Clinical Language Science, University of Reading, Harry Pitt Building, Whiteknights Road, Earley Gate, Reading, RG6 6ES, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH