Policies on return and reintegration of displaced healthcare workers towards rebuilding conflict-affected health systems: a review for The Lancet-AUB Commission on Syria.

Displacement Healthcare workforce Human resources for health Post-conflict health systems Reintegration Return

Journal

Conflict and health
ISSN: 1752-1505
Titre abrégé: Confl Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101286573

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 May 2021
Historique:
received: 13 09 2020
accepted: 19 04 2021
entrez: 8 5 2021
pubmed: 9 5 2021
medline: 9 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

War and armed conflicts severely disrupt all health system components, including the healthcare workforce. Although data is limited on the scale of health care worker (HCW) displacement in conflict zones, it is widely acknowledged that conflict conditions result in the displacement of a significant portion of qualified HCWs from their country of origin. While voluntary HCW return is integral to health system rebuilding in conflict-affected and post-conflict settings, there has been little exploration of the nature of national or international policies which encourage HCW return and reintegration to their home countries in the post-conflict period. We conducted a systematic review to identify policies and policy recommendations intended to facilitate the return of displaced HCWs to their home countries and acknowledge their contribution to rebuilding the post-conflict health system. We searched three bibliographic databases and a range of organisational and national health agency websites to identify peer-reviewed articles and grey literature published in English or Arabic between 1 January 1990 to 24 January 2021, and extracted relevant information. We classified policies and policy recommendations using an adapted version of the UNHCR 4Rs Framework. We identified nine peer-review articles and four grey literature reports that fit our inclusion criteria, all of which were published in English. These covered issues of repatriation (n = 3), reintegration (n = 2), health system rehabilitation and reconstruction (n = 2); six documents covered several of these themes. Information was available for nine conflict contexts: Afghanistan, Iraq, Kosovo, Lebanon, Namibia, Northern Uganda, South Sudan, Timor Leste, and Zimbabwe. Findings demonstrate that health system rebuilding and rehabilitation serve as precursors and reinforcers of the successful return, repatriation, and reintegration of displaced HCWs. Despite the significant numbers of HCWs displaced by conflict, this study identified few specific policies and limited information explicitly focused on the repatriation and reintegration of such workers to their home country in the post-conflict period. Additional research is needed to understand the particular barriers faced by conflict-displaced HCWs in returning to their home country. Conflict-affected and post-conflict states should develop policies and initiatives that address factors within and beyond the health sector to encourage displaced HCW return and provide sustainable reintegration solutions for those who return to post-conflict health systems.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
War and armed conflicts severely disrupt all health system components, including the healthcare workforce. Although data is limited on the scale of health care worker (HCW) displacement in conflict zones, it is widely acknowledged that conflict conditions result in the displacement of a significant portion of qualified HCWs from their country of origin. While voluntary HCW return is integral to health system rebuilding in conflict-affected and post-conflict settings, there has been little exploration of the nature of national or international policies which encourage HCW return and reintegration to their home countries in the post-conflict period.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a systematic review to identify policies and policy recommendations intended to facilitate the return of displaced HCWs to their home countries and acknowledge their contribution to rebuilding the post-conflict health system. We searched three bibliographic databases and a range of organisational and national health agency websites to identify peer-reviewed articles and grey literature published in English or Arabic between 1 January 1990 to 24 January 2021, and extracted relevant information. We classified policies and policy recommendations using an adapted version of the UNHCR 4Rs Framework.
RESULTS RESULTS
We identified nine peer-review articles and four grey literature reports that fit our inclusion criteria, all of which were published in English. These covered issues of repatriation (n = 3), reintegration (n = 2), health system rehabilitation and reconstruction (n = 2); six documents covered several of these themes. Information was available for nine conflict contexts: Afghanistan, Iraq, Kosovo, Lebanon, Namibia, Northern Uganda, South Sudan, Timor Leste, and Zimbabwe. Findings demonstrate that health system rebuilding and rehabilitation serve as precursors and reinforcers of the successful return, repatriation, and reintegration of displaced HCWs.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Despite the significant numbers of HCWs displaced by conflict, this study identified few specific policies and limited information explicitly focused on the repatriation and reintegration of such workers to their home country in the post-conflict period. Additional research is needed to understand the particular barriers faced by conflict-displaced HCWs in returning to their home country. Conflict-affected and post-conflict states should develop policies and initiatives that address factors within and beyond the health sector to encourage displaced HCW return and provide sustainable reintegration solutions for those who return to post-conflict health systems.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33962634
doi: 10.1186/s13031-021-00367-4
pii: 10.1186/s13031-021-00367-4
pmc: PMC8103581
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

36

Subventions

Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : T32 MH103210
Pays : United States

Références

Lancet. 2005 Dec 17;366(9503):2075-6
pubmed: 16365939
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64
pubmed: 19622511
BMJ. 2019 May 14;365:l2205
pubmed: 31092505
Lancet. 2006 Sep 23;368(9541):1119-25
pubmed: 16997666
Int Nurs Rev. 2005 Jun;52(2):123-33
pubmed: 15842325
Lancet. 2008 Sep 6;372(9641):788-9
pubmed: 18774407
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 24;8:195
pubmed: 18816380
Am J Disaster Med. 2020 Winter;15(1):49-69
pubmed: 32804386
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233757
pubmed: 32470071
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Apr 17;17(1):27
pubmed: 30995919
Lancet. 2014 Feb 1;383(9915):449-57
pubmed: 24452046
Lancet. 2013 Mar 16;381(9870):939-48
pubmed: 23499042
PLoS Med. 2011 Dec;8(12):e1001146
pubmed: 22205886
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Jul 28;2(2):e000327
pubmed: 29082000
Disasters. 2011 Oct;35(4):661-79
pubmed: 21913930
Lancet. 2017 Dec 2;390(10111):2516-2526
pubmed: 28314568
Confl Health. 2018 Jun 27;12:28
pubmed: 29983733
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Nov 29;16(1):66
pubmed: 30486844
Fam Med. 2003 Jun;35(6):440-4
pubmed: 12817873
BMJ. 2015 Jun 30;350:h3479
pubmed: 26130331

Auteurs

Diana Rayes (D)

The Lancet-AUB Commission of Syria, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.

Lana Meiqari (L)

The Lancet-AUB Commission of Syria, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Rouham Yamout (R)

The Lancet-AUB Commission of Syria, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Aula Abbara (A)

Imperial College London, London, UK.

Iman Nuwayhid (I)

The Lancet-AUB Commission of Syria, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Samer Jabbour (S)

The Lancet-AUB Commission of Syria, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. sj22@aub.edu.lb.

Marian Abouzeid (M)

The Lancet-AUB Commission of Syria, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation and Centre for Humanitarian Leadership, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Classifications MeSH