Lefamulin efficacy and safety in a pooled phase 3 clinical trial population with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and common clinical comorbidities.
Administration, Intravenous
Administration, Oral
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ therapeutic use
Comorbidity
Diterpenes
/ administration & dosage
Double-Blind Method
Female
Fluoroquinolones
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Male
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Middle Aged
Moxifloxacin
/ administration & dosage
Pneumonia, Bacterial
/ drug therapy
Polycyclic Compounds
/ administration & dosage
Thioglycolates
/ administration & dosage
United States
Young Adult
Antibiotic
Clinical response
Lefamulin
Pleuromutilin
Pneumonia
Journal
BMC pulmonary medicine
ISSN: 1471-2466
Titre abrégé: BMC Pulm Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968563
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 May 2021
08 May 2021
Historique:
received:
01
12
2020
accepted:
17
03
2021
entrez:
9
5
2021
pubmed:
10
5
2021
medline:
16
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lefamulin, a first-in-class pleuromutilin antibiotic approved for intravenous and oral use in adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), was noninferior to moxifloxacin in the Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia (LEAP) 1 intravenous-to-oral switch study and the LEAP 2 oral-only study. Using pooled LEAP 1/2 data, we examined lefamulin efficacy/safety overall and within subgroups of patients presenting with comorbidities typical in CABP management. In LEAP 1, adults with CABP were randomized to receive intravenous lefamulin (150 mg every 12 h) for 5‒7 days or moxifloxacin (400 mg every 24 h) for 7 days, with optional intravenous-to-oral switch if predefined improvement criteria were met. In LEAP 2, adults with CABP were randomized to receive oral lefamulin (600 mg every 12 h) for 5 days or moxifloxacin (400 mg every 24 h) for 7 days. Both studies assessed early clinical response (ECR) at 96 ± 24 h after first study drug dose and investigator assessment of clinical response (IACR) at test-of-cure (5‒10 days after last dose). Pooled analyses of the overall population used a 10% noninferiority margin. Lefamulin (n = 646) was noninferior to moxifloxacin (n = 643) for ECR (89.3% vs 90.5%, respectively; difference - 1.1%; 95% CI - 4.4 to 2.2); IACR success rates at test-of-cure were similarly high (≥ 85.0%). High efficacy with both lefamulin and moxifloxacin was also demonstrated across all well-represented patient subgroups, including those with advanced age, diabetes mellitus, a history of cardiovascular diseases (e.g., hypertension, congestive heart failure, or arrhythmia) or chronic lung diseases (e.g., asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), elevated liver enzymes, or mild-to-moderate renal dysfunction. No new safety signals were identified. Lefamulin may provide a valuable intravenous/oral monotherapy alternative to fluoroquinolones or macrolides for empiric treatment of patients with CABP, including cases of patients at risk for poor outcomes due to age or various comorbidities. ClinicalTrials.gov LEAP 1 (NCT02559310; Registration Date: 24/09/2015) and LEAP 2 (NCT02813694; Registration Date: 27/06/2016).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Lefamulin, a first-in-class pleuromutilin antibiotic approved for intravenous and oral use in adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), was noninferior to moxifloxacin in the Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia (LEAP) 1 intravenous-to-oral switch study and the LEAP 2 oral-only study. Using pooled LEAP 1/2 data, we examined lefamulin efficacy/safety overall and within subgroups of patients presenting with comorbidities typical in CABP management.
METHODS
METHODS
In LEAP 1, adults with CABP were randomized to receive intravenous lefamulin (150 mg every 12 h) for 5‒7 days or moxifloxacin (400 mg every 24 h) for 7 days, with optional intravenous-to-oral switch if predefined improvement criteria were met. In LEAP 2, adults with CABP were randomized to receive oral lefamulin (600 mg every 12 h) for 5 days or moxifloxacin (400 mg every 24 h) for 7 days. Both studies assessed early clinical response (ECR) at 96 ± 24 h after first study drug dose and investigator assessment of clinical response (IACR) at test-of-cure (5‒10 days after last dose). Pooled analyses of the overall population used a 10% noninferiority margin.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Lefamulin (n = 646) was noninferior to moxifloxacin (n = 643) for ECR (89.3% vs 90.5%, respectively; difference - 1.1%; 95% CI - 4.4 to 2.2); IACR success rates at test-of-cure were similarly high (≥ 85.0%). High efficacy with both lefamulin and moxifloxacin was also demonstrated across all well-represented patient subgroups, including those with advanced age, diabetes mellitus, a history of cardiovascular diseases (e.g., hypertension, congestive heart failure, or arrhythmia) or chronic lung diseases (e.g., asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), elevated liver enzymes, or mild-to-moderate renal dysfunction. No new safety signals were identified.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Lefamulin may provide a valuable intravenous/oral monotherapy alternative to fluoroquinolones or macrolides for empiric treatment of patients with CABP, including cases of patients at risk for poor outcomes due to age or various comorbidities.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov LEAP 1 (NCT02559310; Registration Date: 24/09/2015) and LEAP 2 (NCT02813694; Registration Date: 27/06/2016).
Identifiants
pubmed: 33964925
doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01472-z
pii: 10.1186/s12890-021-01472-z
pmc: PMC8105923
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Diterpenes
0
Fluoroquinolones
0
Polycyclic Compounds
0
Thioglycolates
0
lefamulin
21904A5386
Moxifloxacin
U188XYD42P
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02813694', 'NCT02559310']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
154Références
Stat Med. 1985 Apr-Jun;4(2):213-26
pubmed: 4023479
JAMA. 2003 Apr 23-30;289(16):2120-7
pubmed: 12709470
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2018 May;17(5):499-508
pubmed: 29633867
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 May 1;72(5):1272-1274
pubmed: 28160473
Chest. 2020 Sep;158(3):1008-1016
pubmed: 32298730
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 13;69(11):1856-1867
pubmed: 30722059
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 26;72(8):1422-1428
pubmed: 32161946
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015 Jul 30;6:215-23
pubmed: 26257528
Postgrad Med. 2010 Mar;122(2):130-41
pubmed: 20203464
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Sep;13(9):1519-26
pubmed: 27398827
Mol Microbiol. 2004 Dec;54(5):1287-94
pubmed: 15554968
Eur Respir J. 2017 Jun 15;49(6):
pubmed: 28619956
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44 Suppl 2:S27-72
pubmed: 17278083
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2019 Feb;13(2):139-152
pubmed: 30596308
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Jan 24;61(2):
pubmed: 27855075
Lancet. 2015 May 16;385(9981):1949-56
pubmed: 25931244
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):17
pubmed: 30612559
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 13;6:39004
pubmed: 27958389
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 24;7(5):ofaa145
pubmed: 32462049
JAMA. 2019 Nov 5;322(17):1661-1671
pubmed: 31560372
Thorax. 2012 Jan;67(1):71-9
pubmed: 20729232
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Dec;100(6):597-599
pubmed: 27626768
Intern Med. 2013;52(3):317-24
pubmed: 23370738
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(36):e1474
pubmed: 26356705
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 1;200(7):e45-e67
pubmed: 31573350
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Dec 1;47 Suppl 3:S133-9
pubmed: 18986279
JAMA. 2018 Feb 27;319(8):788-799
pubmed: 29486041
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017 Aug;18(11):1039-1048
pubmed: 28598693
Respir Med. 1998 Sep;92(9):1137-42
pubmed: 9926169
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Oct;22(10):1099-106
pubmed: 23963962
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 12;71(6):1583
pubmed: 31822883
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Mar 27;63(4):
pubmed: 30670415