Rotterdam mobile phone app including MRI data for the prediction of prostate cancer: A multicenter external validation.
Magnetic resonance
Medical app
Nomogram
Prostate cancer
Journal
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
received:
08
03
2021
revised:
19
04
2021
accepted:
26
04
2021
pubmed:
10
5
2021
medline:
30
12
2021
entrez:
9
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk calculator (RPCRC) has been validated in the past years. Recently a new version including multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) data has been released. The aim of our study was to analyze the performance of the mpMRI RPCRC app. A series of men undergoing prostate biopsies were enrolled in eleven Italian centers. Indications for prostate biopsy included: abnormal Prostate specific antigen levels (PSA>4 ng/ml), abnormal DRE and abnormal mpMRI. Patients' characteristics were recorded. Prostate cancer (PCa) risk and high-grade PCa risk were assessed using the RPCRC app. The performance of the mpMRI RPCRC in the prediction of cancer and high-grade PCa was evaluated using receiver operator characteristics, calibration plots and decision curve analysis. Overall, 580 patients were enrolled: 404/580 (70%) presented PCa and out of them 224/404 (55%) presented high-grade PCa. In the prediction of cancer, the RC presented good discrimination (AUC = 0.74), poor calibration (p = 0.01) and a clinical net benefit in the range of probabilities between 50 and 90% for the prediction of PCa (Fig. 1). In the prediction of high-grade PCa, the RC presented good discrimination (AUC = 0.79), good calibration (p = 0.48) and a clinical net benefit in the range of probabilities between 20 and 80% (Fig. 1). The Rotterdam prostate cancer risk App accurately predicts the risk of PCa and particularly high-grade cancer. The clinical net benefit is wide for high-grade cancer and therefore its implementation in clinical practice should be encouraged. Further studies should assess its definitive role in clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33965292
pii: S0748-7983(21)00464-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.033
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2640-2645Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest No conflict of interest declared. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for profit sectors. This research involves Human Participants, it does not involve animals and every patient enrolled have signed an informed consent.