Sugar beet powder production using different drying methods, characterization and influence on sensory quality of cocoa-hazelnut cream.

Cocoa-hazelnut cream Functional properties Powder properties Sugar beet powder

Journal

Journal of food science and technology
ISSN: 0022-1155
Titre abrégé: J Food Sci Technol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0056471

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
revised: 23 07 2020
accepted: 11 08 2020
entrez: 10 5 2021
pubmed: 11 5 2021
medline: 11 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The sugar beet powders were produced by oven drying, freeze drying and spray drying methods. Spray-dried powder had spherical particles with smooth surfaces while powders obtained from other methods exhibited flaky shape of particles with irregular surface properties. Freeze drying led to higher porosity, higher phenolic content (466.08 ± 52.71 mmol GAE/g sample) and better flowability (lower angle of repose value) while spray-dried powder depicted better solubility and higher score in overall acceptability in sensory analyses when compared to other powder samples. Oven dried sugar beet powders exhibited the darkest color and lowest score in overall acceptability in sensory analysis. When the sensory attributes and powder properties are considered, spray-dried sugar beet powders might be more appropriate as a functional ingredient to be used in food formulations. On the other hand, more dietary fibre (12.45 ± 2.42 g/100 g powder) and more phenolics containing freeze-dried powders with better color attributes might be better choice in terms of functional properties. This study might be an attractive proposal for developing confectionery products enriched with whole sugar beet powder which have natural bio active substances to fulfill today's increasingly demanding consumer expectations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33967305
doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04715-9
pii: 4715
pmc: PMC8076397
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2068-2077

Informations de copyright

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2020.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Références

Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016 Jun;9:106-110
pubmed: 27135048
Food Chem. 2020 Apr 25;310:125637
pubmed: 31791727
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013 Apr 1;104:207-12
pubmed: 23314610
Food Res Int. 2019 Feb;116:932-941
pubmed: 30717026
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015 Sep 07;15:313
pubmed: 26347338
Appetite. 2016 Dec 1;107:645-653
pubmed: 27637500
Biotechnol Prog. 2005 May-Jun;21(3):885-92
pubmed: 15932269
Food Chem. 2019 Jan 30;272:192-200
pubmed: 30309532
Chem Cent J. 2014 Sep 07;8(1):55
pubmed: 25317204
Curr Res Food Sci. 2020 Mar 16;3:73-81
pubmed: 32914123
Food Chem. 2017 Dec 1;236:59-67
pubmed: 28624090
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2016 Sep 1;1029-1030:36-47
pubmed: 27423042

Auteurs

Ertan Ermis (E)

Food Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, 34303 Istanbul, Turkey.

Merve Özkan (M)

Food Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, 34303 Istanbul, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH