Higher Physical Activity Levels May Help Buffer the Negative Psychological Consequences of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.
anxiety
coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
exercise
motivation
physical activity
public health
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
26
02
2021
accepted:
31
03
2021
entrez:
10
5
2021
pubmed:
11
5
2021
medline:
11
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study explored the associations between physical activity (PA) anxiety levels, and the perception of satisfaction of basic psychological needs (BPN), during Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown. Thus, 1,404 participants (977 women, 426 men, and one respondent preferred not to answer) ranging from 18 to 89 years old (36.4 ± 11.7 year-old) completed a questionnaire in the period between 1st and 15th April 2021. The survey included sociodemographic data and the following validated instruments: the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), the Basic Need General Satisfaction Scale and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. The Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to examine variation in anxiety levels and BPN satisfaction according to PA category (low, moderate, and high). Spearman's Rho correlations coefficients were used to determine the association between anxiety levels and psychological needs. Individuals presenting a higher level of PA revealed lower levels of anxiety-state (
Identifiants
pubmed: 33967927
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672811
pmc: PMC8100311
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
672811Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Antunes, Rebelo-Gonçalves, Amaro, Salvador, Matos, Morouço and Frontini.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Sep;136:110186
pubmed: 32682159
J Sport Health Sci. 2020 Mar;9(2):103-104
pubmed: 32099716
J Sports Sci. 2003 Nov;21(11):883-904
pubmed: 14626368
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 20;11:491
pubmed: 32265796
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Sep;142(3):249-256
pubmed: 32716520
Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Jul;10(7):1206-12
pubmed: 15324539
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 15;208:545-552
pubmed: 27802893
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 31;17(11):
pubmed: 32486380
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 28;17(17):
pubmed: 32872154
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 18;17(12):
pubmed: 32570737
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 20;11:582436
pubmed: 33329238
Psychol Med. 2021 Jan 13;:1-9
pubmed: 33436120
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jan;41(1):3-13
pubmed: 19092709
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2011 Dec;33(6):828-46
pubmed: 22262707
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95
pubmed: 12900694
Epidemiol Health. 2016 Nov 5;38:e2016048
pubmed: 28196409
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 05;17(21):
pubmed: 33167479
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 06;17(5):
pubmed: 32155789
Br J Nurs. 2018 Jan 25;27(2):88-91
pubmed: 29368561
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e203976
pubmed: 32202646
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 30;12:659599
pubmed: 33859601
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 4;20(1):1648
pubmed: 33148202
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):54-67
pubmed: 10620381
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920
pubmed: 32112714