Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of No Adjuvant Therapy Versus Partial Breast Irradiation Alone Versus Combined Treatment for Treatment of Low-Risk DCIS: A Microsimulation.


Journal

JCO oncology practice
ISSN: 2688-1535
Titre abrégé: JCO Oncol Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101758685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 11 5 2021
medline: 3 11 2021
entrez: 10 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Adjuvant therapy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ who undergo partial mastectomy remains controversial, particularly for low-risk patients (60 years or older, estrogen-positive, tumor extent < 2.5 cm, grade 1 or 2, and margins ≥ 3 mm). We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing three strategies: no adjuvant treatment after surgery, a five-fraction course of accelerated partial breast irradiation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (accelerated partial breast irradiation [APBI]-alone), or APBI plus an aromatase inhibitor for 5 years. Outcomes including local recurrence, distant metastases, and survival as well as toxicity data were modeled by a patient-level Markov microsimulation model, which were validated against trial data. Costs of treatment and possible adverse events were included from the societal perspective over a lifetime horizon, adjusted to 2019 US dollars and extracted from Medicare reimbursement data. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated based on utilities extracted from the literature. No adjuvant therapy was the least costly approach ($5,744), followed by APBI-alone ($11,070); combined therapy was costliest ($16,052). Adjuvant therapy resulted in slightly higher QALYs (no adjuvant, 11.320; APBI-alone, 11.343; and combination, 11.381). In the base case, no treatment was the cost-effective strategy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $239,109/QALY for APBI-alone and $171,718/QALY for combined therapy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for combined therapy compared with APBI-alone was $131,949. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses found that no therapy was cost effective (defined as $100,000/QALY of lower) in 63% of trials, APBI-alone in 19%, and the combination in 18%. No adjuvant therapy represents the most cost-effective approach for postmenopausal women 60 years or older who receive partial mastectomy for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33970684
doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00992
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1055-e1074

Auteurs

Matthew C Ward (MC)

Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, NC.

Frank Vicini (F)

21st Century Oncology, Farmington Hills, MI.

Zahraa Al-Hilli (Z)

Department of Breast Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Manjeet Chadha (M)

Ichan School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, New York, NY.

Abel Abraham (A)

Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Abram Recht (A)

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.

James Hayman (J)

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Nikhil Thaker (N)

Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AZ.

Atif J Khan (AJ)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

Martin Keisch (M)

Cancer HealthCare Associates, Miami, FL.

Chirag Shah (C)

Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH