No evidence to support the impact of migration background on treatment response rates and cancer survival: a retrospective matched-pair analysis in Germany.
Cancer
Comprehensive cancer center
Germany
Matched-pair analysis
Migration background
Response rate
Socioeconomic status
Survival
Journal
BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 May 2021
10 May 2021
Historique:
received:
29
07
2020
accepted:
02
04
2021
entrez:
11
5
2021
pubmed:
12
5
2021
medline:
21
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Immigration has taken the central stage in world politics, especially in the developed countries like Germany, where the continuous flow of immigrants has been well documented since 1960s. Strikingly, emerging data suggest that migrant patients have a poorer response to the treatment and lower survival rates in their new host country, raising concerns about health disparities. Herein, we present our investigation on the treatment response rate and cancer survival in German patients with and without an immigrant background that were treated at our comprehensive cancer center in Germany. Initially, we considered 8162 cancer patients treated at the Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Bonn, Germany (April 2002-December 2015) for matched-pair analysis. Subsequently, the German patients with a migration background and those from the native German population were manually identified and catalogued using a highly specific name-based algorithm. The clinical parameters such as demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, defined staging criteria, and primary therapy were further adjusted. Using these stringent criteria, a total of 422 patients (n = 211, Germans with migration background; n = 211, native German population) were screened to compare for the treatment response and survival rates (i.e., 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and time to progression). Compared to the cohort with migration background, the cohort without migration background was slightly older (54.9 vs. 57.9 years) while having the same sex distribution (54.5% vs. 55.0% female) and longer follow-up time (36.9 vs. 42.6 months). We did not find significant differences in cancer survival (5-year overall survival, P = 0.771) and the response rates (Overall Remission Rate; McNemar's test, P = 0.346) between both collectives. Contrary to prior reports, we found no significant differences in cancer survival between German patients with immigrant background and native German patients. Nevertheless, the advanced treatment protocols implemented at our comprehensive cancer center may possibly account for the low variance in outcome. To conduct similar studies with a broader perspective, we propose that certain risk factors (country-of-origin-specific infections, dietary habits, epigenetics for chronic diseases etc.) should be considered, specially in the future studies that will recruit new arrivals from the 2015 German refugee crisis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Immigration has taken the central stage in world politics, especially in the developed countries like Germany, where the continuous flow of immigrants has been well documented since 1960s. Strikingly, emerging data suggest that migrant patients have a poorer response to the treatment and lower survival rates in their new host country, raising concerns about health disparities. Herein, we present our investigation on the treatment response rate and cancer survival in German patients with and without an immigrant background that were treated at our comprehensive cancer center in Germany.
METHODS
METHODS
Initially, we considered 8162 cancer patients treated at the Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Bonn, Germany (April 2002-December 2015) for matched-pair analysis. Subsequently, the German patients with a migration background and those from the native German population were manually identified and catalogued using a highly specific name-based algorithm. The clinical parameters such as demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, defined staging criteria, and primary therapy were further adjusted. Using these stringent criteria, a total of 422 patients (n = 211, Germans with migration background; n = 211, native German population) were screened to compare for the treatment response and survival rates (i.e., 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and time to progression).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Compared to the cohort with migration background, the cohort without migration background was slightly older (54.9 vs. 57.9 years) while having the same sex distribution (54.5% vs. 55.0% female) and longer follow-up time (36.9 vs. 42.6 months). We did not find significant differences in cancer survival (5-year overall survival, P = 0.771) and the response rates (Overall Remission Rate; McNemar's test, P = 0.346) between both collectives.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Contrary to prior reports, we found no significant differences in cancer survival between German patients with immigrant background and native German patients. Nevertheless, the advanced treatment protocols implemented at our comprehensive cancer center may possibly account for the low variance in outcome. To conduct similar studies with a broader perspective, we propose that certain risk factors (country-of-origin-specific infections, dietary habits, epigenetics for chronic diseases etc.) should be considered, specially in the future studies that will recruit new arrivals from the 2015 German refugee crisis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33971845
doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08141-8
pii: 10.1186/s12885-021-08141-8
pmc: PMC8108356
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
526Références
Acta Oncol. 2013 Nov;52(8):1637-42
pubmed: 23317144
World J Urol. 2013 Dec;31(6):1483-8
pubmed: 23306784
Cancer Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;33(6):413-8
pubmed: 19900846
Br J Cancer. 2011 Mar 29;104(7):1193-5
pubmed: 21343940
BMC Cancer. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):869
pubmed: 31477050
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Oct;26(5):804-813
pubmed: 27221607
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Aug;24 Suppl 1:64-71
pubmed: 25108000
Int J Cancer. 2002 May 10;99(2):229-37
pubmed: 11979438
Int J Cancer. 2002 May 10;99(2):218-28
pubmed: 11979437
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Sep;46(14):2647-59
pubmed: 20843493
BMC Cancer. 2008 Nov 28;8:355
pubmed: 19040749
Gesundheitswesen. 2006 Oct;68(10):643-9
pubmed: 17099826
Cancer Med. 2019 May;8(5):2623-2635
pubmed: 30897287
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Aug;28(8):863-70
pubmed: 27187801
BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 30;19(1):1024
pubmed: 31666035