Allocation of COVID-19 vaccination: when public prioritisation preferences differ from official regulations.

COVID-19 public health ethics resource allocation

Journal

Journal of medical ethics
ISSN: 1473-4257
Titre abrégé: J Med Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7513619

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 May 2021
Historique:
received: 18 02 2021
revised: 01 04 2021
accepted: 05 04 2021
entrez: 11 5 2021
pubmed: 12 5 2021
medline: 12 5 2021
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

As vaccines against COVID-19 are scarce, many countries have developed vaccination prioritisation strategies focusing on ethical and epidemiological considerations. However, public acceptance of such strategies should be monitored to ensure successful implementation. In an experiment with

Identifiants

pubmed: 33972372
pii: medethics-2021-107339
doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107339
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Philipp Sprengholz (P)

Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany philipp.sprengholz@uni-erfurt.de.

Lars Korn (L)

Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.

Sarah Eitze (S)

Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.

Cornelia Betsch (C)

Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.

Classifications MeSH