Lorlatinib Exposure-Response Analyses for Safety and Efficacy in a Phase I/II Trial to Support Benefit-Risk Assessment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Adult
Aged
Aminopyridines
/ adverse effects
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ diagnosis
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
/ diagnosis
Female
Humans
Hypercholesterolemia
/ chemically induced
Lactams
/ adverse effects
Lung Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Male
Middle Aged
Pyrazoles
/ adverse effects
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Journal
Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
ISSN: 1532-6535
Titre abrégé: Clin Pharmacol Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372741
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
31
07
2020
accepted:
23
02
2021
pubmed:
12
5
2021
medline:
1
12
2021
entrez:
11
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Lorlatinib is a small molecule inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-ROS oncogene 1 (ROS1) tyrosine kinases and is approved for the treatment of patients with ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the phase I/II study (NCT01970865), potential exposure-response (E-R) relationships between lorlatinib and selected safety and efficacy end points were evaluated in patients with NSCLC. E-R relationships were assessed for safety end points with incidence > 10% in all treated patients (n = 328). In total, 4 safety end points were assessed: hypercholesterolemia grade ≥ 3, hypertriglyceridemia grade ≥ 3, weight gain grade ≥ 2, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) grade ≥ 3. Using logistic regression, significant relationships were identified between lorlatinib plasma exposure and risk of hypercholesterolemia grade ≥ 3 (odds ratio (OR) 5.256) and risk of TEAE grade ≥ 3 (OR 3.214). The covariates baseline cholesterol and time on study prior to the event (TE) were associated with the probability of hypercholesterolemia grade ≥ 3. Baseline cholesterol and TE were found to have a statistically significant correlation with TEAE grade ≥ 3. Exposure-efficacy relationships were assessed for objective response rate (ORR; n = 197) and intracranial objective response rate (IC-ORR; n = 132). Lorlatinib plasma exposure was not identified as a statistically significant factor related to either efficacy end point. The only significant E-R relationships identified for efficacy were between baseline alkaline phosphatase and baseline amylase with IC-ORR (ORs 0.363 and 1.015, respectively). These findings support the lorlatinib indicated dose and dose modification guidelines regarding the management of lorlatinib-related AEs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33973232
doi: 10.1002/cpt.2228
pmc: PMC9290079
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aminopyridines
0
Lactams
0
Pyrazoles
0
lorlatinib
OSP71S83EU
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01970865']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1273-1281Subventions
Organisme : Pfizer Inc.
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021 Pfizer Inc. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Références
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86
pubmed: 25220842
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 10;30(8):863-70
pubmed: 22215748
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Aug 15;18(16):4449-57
pubmed: 22661537
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;82(1):129-138
pubmed: 29748847
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Jul;14(7):1255-1265
pubmed: 30851442
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1119-28
pubmed: 25153538
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Feb;109(2):394-402
pubmed: 32686074
Cancer Cell. 2015 Jul 13;28(1):70-81
pubmed: 26144315
N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 28;363(18):1693-703
pubmed: 20979469
J Med Chem. 2014 Jun 12;57(11):4720-44
pubmed: 24819116
Drugs. 2019 Jan;79(1):93-98
pubmed: 30604291
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;5(12):1749-1768
pubmed: 31560378
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Dec;18(12):1590-1599
pubmed: 29074098
Trends Cancer. 2016 Jul;2(7):350-364
pubmed: 27819059
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1691-1701
pubmed: 31669155
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):1654-1667
pubmed: 30413378