Linked color imaging versus white light imaging colonoscopy for colorectal adenoma detection: A randomized controlled trial.
colonoscopy
colorectal adenoma
linked color imaging
white light imaging
Journal
Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
ISSN: 1440-1746
Titre abrégé: J Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 8607909
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
revised:
27
04
2021
received:
19
08
2020
accepted:
07
05
2021
pubmed:
12
5
2021
medline:
11
2
2022
entrez:
11
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The adenoma detection rate is an important indicator of colonoscopy quality and colorectal cancer incidence. We compared the adenoma detection rates between white light imaging (WLI) and linked color imaging (LCI) colonoscopy. Patients undergoing colonoscopy for positive fecal immunochemical tests, follow-up of colon polyps, and abdominal symptoms at three institutions were randomly assigned to the LCI or WLI groups. Mean adenoma number per patient (including based on endoscopists' experience), adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, mean adenoma number per location, and adenoma size were compared. The LCI and WLI groups comprised 494 and 501 patients, respectively. No significant differences in the cecal intubation rate (LCI vs WLI: 99.5% vs 99.4%), cecal intubation time, and withdrawal time were noted between groups. The mean adenoma number per patient was significantly higher in the LCI group than in the WLI group (1.07 vs 0.88, P = 0.04), particularly in the descending [0.12 (58/494) vs 0.07 (35/501), P = 0.01] and sigmoid colon [0.41 (201/494) vs 0.30 (149/501), P ≤ 0.001]. However, the adenoma detection rate was 47.1% in the LCI group and 46.9% in the WLI group, with no significant difference (P = 0.93). The total number of sessile-type adenomas was significantly higher in the LCI group than in the WLI group (346/494 vs 278/501, P = 0.04). As for polyp size, small polyps (≤ 5 mm) were detected at a significantly higher rate in the LCI group (271/494 vs 336/501, P = 0.04). Linked color imaging is significantly superior to WLI in terms of mean adenoma number per patient.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
OBJECTIVE
The adenoma detection rate is an important indicator of colonoscopy quality and colorectal cancer incidence. We compared the adenoma detection rates between white light imaging (WLI) and linked color imaging (LCI) colonoscopy.
METHODS
METHODS
Patients undergoing colonoscopy for positive fecal immunochemical tests, follow-up of colon polyps, and abdominal symptoms at three institutions were randomly assigned to the LCI or WLI groups. Mean adenoma number per patient (including based on endoscopists' experience), adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, mean adenoma number per location, and adenoma size were compared.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The LCI and WLI groups comprised 494 and 501 patients, respectively. No significant differences in the cecal intubation rate (LCI vs WLI: 99.5% vs 99.4%), cecal intubation time, and withdrawal time were noted between groups. The mean adenoma number per patient was significantly higher in the LCI group than in the WLI group (1.07 vs 0.88, P = 0.04), particularly in the descending [0.12 (58/494) vs 0.07 (35/501), P = 0.01] and sigmoid colon [0.41 (201/494) vs 0.30 (149/501), P ≤ 0.001]. However, the adenoma detection rate was 47.1% in the LCI group and 46.9% in the WLI group, with no significant difference (P = 0.93). The total number of sessile-type adenomas was significantly higher in the LCI group than in the WLI group (346/494 vs 278/501, P = 0.04). As for polyp size, small polyps (≤ 5 mm) were detected at a significantly higher rate in the LCI group (271/494 vs 336/501, P = 0.04).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Linked color imaging is significantly superior to WLI in terms of mean adenoma number per patient.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2778-2784Informations de copyright
© 2021 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013; 369: 1095-1105.
Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2015; 81: 31-53.
Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010; 362: 1795-1803.
Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014; 370: 1298-1306.
Imaeda H, Yamaoka M, Ohgo H et al. Randomized control trial of adenoma detection rate in Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy versus transparent hood-assisted colonoscopy. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019; 34: 1492-1496.
Kondo S, Yamaji Y, Watabe H et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefulness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2007; 102: 75-81.
Rastogi A, Bansal A, Rao DS et al. Higher adenoma detection rates with cap-assisted colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2012; 61: 402-408.
Pohl H, Bensen SP, Toor A et al. Cap-assisted colonoscopy and detection of Adenomatous Polyps (CAP) study: a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 891-897.
González-Fernández C, García-Rangel D, Aguilar-Olivos NE et al. Higher adenoma detection rate with the Endocuff: a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 1061-1068.
Wada Y, Fukuda M, Ohtsuka K et al. Efficacy of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal polyps. Endosc. Int. Open 2018; 6: E425-E431.
De Palma GD, Giglio MC, Bruzzese D et al. Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2018; 87: 232-240.
Ngu WS, Bevan R, Tsiamoulos ZP et al. Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial. Gut 2019; 68: 280-288.
Cavallaro LG, Hassan C, Lecis P et al. The impact of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection in an organized screening program. Endosc. Int. Open 2018; 6: E437-E442.
Chin M, Karnes W, Jamal MM et al. Use of the Endocuff during routine colonoscopy examination improves adenoma detection: a meta-analysis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016; 22: 9642-9649.
Dik VK, Gralnek IM, Segol O et al. Multicenter, randomized, tandem evaluation of EndoRings colonoscopy--results of the CLEVER study. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 1151-1158.
Ikematsu H, Sakamoto T, Togashi K et al. Detectability of colorectal neoplastic lesions using a novel endoscopic system with blue laser imaging: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2017; 86: 386-394.
Ogiso K, Yoshida N, Siah KT et al. New-generation narrow band imaging improves visibility of polyps: a colonoscopy video evaluation study. J. Gastroenterol. 2016; 51: 883-890.
Horimatsu T, Sano Y, Tanaka S et al. Next-generation narrow band imaging system for colonic polyp detection: a prospective multicenter randomized trial. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2015; 30: 947-954.
Rex DK, Clodfelter R, Rahmani F et al. Narrow-band imaging versus white light for the detection of proximal colon serrated lesions: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2016; 83: 166-171.
Guo TJ, Chen W, Chen Y, Wu JC, Wang YP, Yang JL. Diagnostic performance of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging in differentiating neoplastic colorectal polyps from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps: a meta-analysis. J. Gastroenterol. 2018; 53: 701-711.
Rastogi A, Early DS, Gupta N et al. Randomized, controlled trial of standard-definition white-light, high definition white-light, and narrow-band imaging colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and prediction of polyp histology. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2011; 74: 593-602.
Leung WK, Lo OS, Liu KS et al. Detection of colorectal adenoma by narrow band imaging (HQ190) vs. high definition white light colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2014; 109: 855-863.
Yoshida N, Hisabe T, Hirose R et al. Improvement in the visibility of colorectal polyps by using blue laser imaging. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2015; 82: 542-549.
Shimoda R, Sakata Y, Fujise T et al. The adenoma miss rate of blue-laser imaging vs. white-light imaging during colonoscopy: a randomized tandem trial. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 186-190.
Paggi S, Mogavero G, Amato A et al. Linked color imaging reduces the miss rate of neoplastic lesions in the right colon: a randomized tandem colonoscopy study. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 396-402.
Yoshida N, Naito Y, Yasuda R et al. Linked color imaging improves the visibility of various featured colorectal polyps in an endoscopist's visibility and color difference value. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2017; 32: 1253-1260.
Fujimoto D, Muguruma N, Okamoto K et al. Linked color imaging enhances endoscopic detection of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps. Endosc. Int. Open 2018; 6: E322-E334.
Oliveira Dos Santos CE, Malaman D, Pereira-Lima JC, de Quadros OF, Filho JMR. Impact of linked-color imaging on colorectal adenoma detection. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2019; 90: 826-834.
Shinozaki S, Kobayashi Y, Hayashi Y et al. Colon polyp detection using linked color imaging compared to white light imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig. Endosc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13613
Leighton JA, Rex DK. A grading scale to evaluate colon cleansing for the PillCam COLON: a reliability study. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 123-127.
de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM et al. Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2012; 61: 1426-1434.
Ng SC, Tsoi KK, Hirai HW et al. The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2012; 107: 165-173.
Yoshida N, Inada Y, Yasuda R et al. Additional thirty seconds observation with linked color imaging improves detection of missed polyps in the right-sided colon. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2018; 2018: 5059834.
Min M, Deng P, Zhang W, Sun X, Liu Y, Nong B. Comparison of linked color imaging and white-light colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2017; 86: 724-730.
Hazewinkel Y, Tytgat KM, van Leerdam ME et al. Narrow-band imaging for the detection of polyps in patients with serrated polyposis syndrome: a multicenter, randomized, back-to-back trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2015; 81: 531-538.
Suzuki T, Hara T, Kitagawa Y et al. Linked-color imaging improves endoscopic visibility of colorectal nongranular flat lesions. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2017; 86: 692-697.
Sakamoto T, Tomizawa Y, Cho H et al. Additional value of linked color imaging in colonoscopy: a retrospective study. Endosc. Int. Open 2019; 7: E1448-E1454.