Prognostic Factors in De Novo Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Report From the Latin American Renal Cancer Group.
Journal
JCO global oncology
ISSN: 2687-8941
Titre abrégé: JCO Glob Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101760170
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
entrez:
11
5
2021
pubmed:
12
5
2021
medline:
6
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the effect of clinical and pathological variables on cancer-specific and overall survival (OS) in de novo metastatic patients from a collaborative of primarily Latin American countries. Of 4,060 patients with renal cell carcinoma diagnosed between 1990 and 2015, a total of 530 (14.5%) had metastasis at clinical presentation. Relationships between clinical and pathological parameters and treatment-related outcomes were analyzed by Cox regression and the log-rank method. Of 530 patients, 184 (90.6%) had died of renal cell carcinoma. The median OS of the entire cohort was 24 months. American Society of Anesthesiology classification 3-4 (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.64), perirenal fat invasion (HR: 2.02), and ≥ 2 metastatic organ sites (HR: 2.19) were independent prognostic factors for 5-year OS in multivariable analyses. We created a risk group stratification with these variables: no adverse risk factors (favorable group), median OS not reached; one adverse factor (intermediate group), median OS 33 months (HR: 2.04); and two or three adverse factors (poor risk group), median OS 14 months (HR: 3.58). Our study defines novel prognostic factors that are relevant to a Latin American cohort. With external validation, these easily discerned clinical variables can be used to offer prognostic information across low- and middle-income countries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33974442
doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00621
pmc: PMC8162501
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
671-685Références
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Dec;14(6):465-472
pubmed: 27138461
Ann Oncol. 2011 Feb;22(2):295-300
pubmed: 20657034
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Mar;46(4):765-81
pubmed: 20116997
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86
pubmed: 25220842
Ann Oncol. 2012 Apr;23(4):973-80
pubmed: 21890909
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 20;34(30):3655-3663
pubmed: 27601543
J Urol. 1982 Jun;127(6):1092-5
pubmed: 7087014
J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):1901-5
pubmed: 17868728
J Urol. 2017 Aug;198(2):289-296
pubmed: 28274620
World J Urol. 2016 Aug;34(8):1081-6
pubmed: 26847337
Urol Int. 2010;84(1):67-72
pubmed: 20173372
Lancet. 2001 Sep 22;358(9286):966-70
pubmed: 11583750
Urology. 2003 Feb;61(2):314-9
pubmed: 12597937
Cancer Res. 1988 Dec 15;48(24 Pt 1):7310-3
pubmed: 3056613
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):519-30
pubmed: 25449206
Ann Oncol. 2002 Sep;13(9):1460-8
pubmed: 12196373
Cancer. 2008 Jul 1;113(1):78-83
pubmed: 18491376
Eur Urol. 2011 Jan;59(1):135-41
pubmed: 21035250
BJU Int. 2009 Jan;103(1):33-7
pubmed: 18990161
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 02;379(5):417-427
pubmed: 29860937
Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):577-84
pubmed: 23962746
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Aug;17(8):2530-40
pubmed: 10561319
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 1;27(34):5794-9
pubmed: 19826129
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(34):e1361
pubmed: 26313773
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2001 Mar;47(3):155-8
pubmed: 11329954
N Engl J Med. 2001 Dec 6;345(23):1655-9
pubmed: 11759643
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 26;376(4):354-366
pubmed: 28121507
Urology. 2005 Apr;65(4):675-80
pubmed: 15833507
J Urol. 2005 Nov;174(5):1759-63; discussion 1763
pubmed: 16217278