Savoring the present: The reciprocal influence between positive emotions and positive emotion regulation in everyday life.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
07
09
2020
accepted:
28
04
2021
entrez:
11
5
2021
pubmed:
12
5
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A growing body of research has investigated the regulation of negative emotions in ecological settings, but little is known about the mechanisms underlying positive emotion regulation in everyday life. Although some evidence suggests that adopting positive strategies is beneficial for emotional well-being, the literature is inconsistent about the effects of positive emotions on subsequent regulatory processes. In the present study, we adopted a two-week ecological momentary assessment to explore the association between positive emotions and positive emotion regulation in daily life. According to our results, the less individuals felt positive emotions at one point, the more they tended to enhance their use of positive strategies from this time to the next, which in turn resulted in subsequent higher levels of positive emotions. This prototype of positive regulation can be seen as a highly adaptive mechanism that makes it possible to compensate for a lack of positive emotions by enhancing the deployment of positive strategies. The theoretical and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33974680
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251561
pii: PONE-D-20-28135
pmc: PMC8112694
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0251561Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:745-74
pubmed: 14744233
J Pers. 2008 Jun;76(3):561-80
pubmed: 18399953
Percept Mot Skills. 2009 Aug;109(1):76-8
pubmed: 19831088
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Nov;30(7):890-905
pubmed: 20451313
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):34-43
pubmed: 11392863
Psychol Sci. 2002 Jan;13(1):81-4
pubmed: 11894851
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Sep;85(3):566-80
pubmed: 14498791
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 Jan;129(1):56-63
pubmed: 31868388
Emotion. 2010 Feb;10(1):72-82
pubmed: 20141304
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(4):755-63
pubmed: 25040183
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Apr;84(4):822-48
pubmed: 12703651
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 22;105(3):1050-4
pubmed: 18195362
Rev Gen Psychol. 1998 Sep;2(3):300-319
pubmed: 21850154
Am Psychol. 2000 Jun;55(6):647-54
pubmed: 10892207
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 12;11:1333
pubmed: 32595578
Emotion. 2013 Oct;13(5):926-39
pubmed: 23731436
Pers Individ Dif. 2008 Jan;44(2):360-370
pubmed: 21753863
Emotion. 2008 Oct;8(5):714-9
pubmed: 18837622
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 30;113(35):9769-73
pubmed: 27528666
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;86(2):320-33
pubmed: 14769087
Am Psychol. 2001 Mar;56(3):218-26
pubmed: 11315248
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jun;100(6):1095-110
pubmed: 21219075
Cognit Ther Res. 2008 Aug 1;32(4):507-525
pubmed: 20360998
Emotion. 2020 Feb;20(1):30-36
pubmed: 31961174
Assessment. 2020 Sep 10;:1073191120957102
pubmed: 32909448
Cogn Behav Ther. 2017 Mar;46(2):91-113
pubmed: 27684649
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:390865
pubmed: 24804219
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Aug;87(2):228-45
pubmed: 15301629
Psychol Rep. 2002 Dec;91(3 Pt 2):1079-80
pubmed: 12585516
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Dec;99(6):1042-60
pubmed: 20853980
Emotion. 2013 Feb;13(1):1-6
pubmed: 23163709
Cogn Emot. 2014;28(5):834-44
pubmed: 24237485
Psychol Rev. 1967 Jan;74(1):29-39
pubmed: 5341441
Psychol Sci. 2002 Mar;13(2):172-5
pubmed: 11934003
Psychol Bull. 2015 May;141(3):655-93
pubmed: 25621978
Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Apr;33(3):343-60
pubmed: 23399829
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
Emotion. 2014 Oct;14(5):878-91
pubmed: 24999913
Psychol Bull. 2005 Nov;131(6):803-55
pubmed: 16351326
Psychol Sci. 2019 Aug;30(8):1111-1122
pubmed: 31268832