2020 list of human papillomavirus assays suitable for primary cervical cancer screening.


Journal

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
ISSN: 1469-0691
Titre abrégé: Clin Microbiol Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9516420

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 11 01 2021
revised: 06 03 2021
accepted: 27 04 2021
pubmed: 12 5 2021
medline: 8 1 2022
entrez: 11 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Only clinically validated HPV assays can be accepted in cervical cancer screening. To update the list of high-risk HPV assays that fulfil the 2009 international validation criteria (Meijer-2009). PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, references from selected studies; published in January 2014 to August 2020. HPV test validation studies and primary screening studies, involving testing with an index HPV test and a comparator HPV test with reporting of disease outcome (occurrence of histologically confirmed cervical precancer; CIN2+). Women participating in cervical cancer screening. Testing with an index and a comparator HPV test of clinician-collected cervical specimens and assessment of disease outcome (<CIN2, CIN2+). Comparator HPV assays were HC2, GP5+/6+ PCR-EIA, recommended in validation guidelines, or tests with consistent previous validations. Assessment of relative clinical accuracy (including non-inferiority statistics index vs comparator assay) and test reproducibility in individual studies; random effects meta-analyses of the relative clinical sensitivity and specificity of index vs comparator tests. Seven hrHPV DNA tests consistently fulfilled all validation criteria in multiple studies using predefined test positivity cut-offs (Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV, Anyplex II HPV HR Detection, BD Onclarity HPV Assay, Cobas 4800 HPV Test, HPV-Risk Assay, PapilloCheck HPV-Screening Test and Xpert HPV). Another assay (Alinity m HR HPV Assay) was fully validated in one validation study. The newer Cobas 6800 HPV Test, was validated in two studies against Cobas 4800. Other tests partially fulfilled the international validation criteria (Cervista HPV HR Test, EUROArray HPV, Hybribio's 14 High-Risk HPV, LMNX Genotyping Kit GP HPV, MALDI-TOF, RIATOL qPCR and a number of other in-house developed assays) since the non-inferior accuracy was reached after a posteriori cut-off optimization, inconsistent accuracy findings in different studies, and/or insufficient reproducibility assessment. The APTIMA HPV Assay targeting E6/E7 mRNA of hrHPV was fully validated in one formal validation study and showed slightly lower pooled sensitivity but higher specificity than the standard comparator tests in seven screening studies. However, the current international validation criteria relate to DNA assays. The additional requirement for longitudinal performance data required for non-DNA based HPV assays was not assessed in this review. Eleven hrHPV DNA assays fulfil all requirements for use in cervical cancer screening using clinician-collected specimens.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Only clinically validated HPV assays can be accepted in cervical cancer screening.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To update the list of high-risk HPV assays that fulfil the 2009 international validation criteria (Meijer-2009).
DATA SOURCES METHODS
PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, references from selected studies; published in January 2014 to August 2020.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA METHODS
HPV test validation studies and primary screening studies, involving testing with an index HPV test and a comparator HPV test with reporting of disease outcome (occurrence of histologically confirmed cervical precancer; CIN2+).
PARTICIPANTS METHODS
Women participating in cervical cancer screening.
INTERVENTIONS METHODS
Testing with an index and a comparator HPV test of clinician-collected cervical specimens and assessment of disease outcome (<CIN2, CIN2+). Comparator HPV assays were HC2, GP5+/6+ PCR-EIA, recommended in validation guidelines, or tests with consistent previous validations.
METHODS METHODS
Assessment of relative clinical accuracy (including non-inferiority statistics index vs comparator assay) and test reproducibility in individual studies; random effects meta-analyses of the relative clinical sensitivity and specificity of index vs comparator tests.
RESULTS RESULTS
Seven hrHPV DNA tests consistently fulfilled all validation criteria in multiple studies using predefined test positivity cut-offs (Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV, Anyplex II HPV HR Detection, BD Onclarity HPV Assay, Cobas 4800 HPV Test, HPV-Risk Assay, PapilloCheck HPV-Screening Test and Xpert HPV). Another assay (Alinity m HR HPV Assay) was fully validated in one validation study. The newer Cobas 6800 HPV Test, was validated in two studies against Cobas 4800. Other tests partially fulfilled the international validation criteria (Cervista HPV HR Test, EUROArray HPV, Hybribio's 14 High-Risk HPV, LMNX Genotyping Kit GP HPV, MALDI-TOF, RIATOL qPCR and a number of other in-house developed assays) since the non-inferior accuracy was reached after a posteriori cut-off optimization, inconsistent accuracy findings in different studies, and/or insufficient reproducibility assessment. The APTIMA HPV Assay targeting E6/E7 mRNA of hrHPV was fully validated in one formal validation study and showed slightly lower pooled sensitivity but higher specificity than the standard comparator tests in seven screening studies. However, the current international validation criteria relate to DNA assays. The additional requirement for longitudinal performance data required for non-DNA based HPV assays was not assessed in this review.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Eleven hrHPV DNA assays fulfil all requirements for use in cervical cancer screening using clinician-collected specimens.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33975008
pii: S1198-743X(21)00219-6
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.04.031
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1083-1095

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Marc Arbyn (M)

Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Ghent, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: marc.arbyn@sciensano.be.

Marie Simon (M)

Haute Autorité de Santé, Saint Denis, France.

Eliana Peeters (E)

Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium.

Lan Xu (L)

Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium; School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Chris J L M Meijer (CJLM)

Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Johannes Berkhof (J)

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Kate Cuschieri (K)

Scottish HPV Reference Laboratory, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Jesper Bonde (J)

Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.

Anja Ostrbenk Vanlencak (A)

Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Fang-Hui Zhao (FH)

Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Remila Rezhake (R)

Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; The 3rd Affiliated Teaching Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Affiliated Cancer Hospital), Urumqi, China.

Murat Gultekin (M)

Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.

Joakim Dillner (J)

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Silvia de Sanjosé (S)

National Cancer Institute, Rockville, USA.

Karen Canfell (K)

Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia; School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Peter Hillemanns (P)

Departments of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hannover Medical School, Germany.

Maribel Almonte (M)

International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.

Nicolas Wentzensen (N)

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer, Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Mario Poljak (M)

Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH