Four Cases of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment That Recurred More than 10 Years after Initial Reattachment by Pars Plana Vitrectomy.
Late recurrence
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
Vitrectomy
Journal
Case reports in ophthalmology
ISSN: 1663-2699
Titre abrégé: Case Rep Ophthalmol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101532006
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
26
07
2020
accepted:
06
09
2020
entrez:
12
5
2021
pubmed:
13
5
2021
medline:
13
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this report was to present our findings in 4 cases of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) that recurred 10, 11, 12, and 17 years after a reattachment surgery by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Four cases of a recurrent RRD had undergone scleral buckling surgery and vitrectomy. The recurrence of the RRD was observed 10-17 years after the successful attachment by PPV. The macula was detached in all cases, and none of the eyes had severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy. The cause of the recurrence was a new retinal break in 3 eyes and a reopening of an old retinal break in the other eye. The new breaks had a punched-out shape and had neither a horseshoe tear nor an atrophic hole associated with lattice degeneration. PPV combined with scleral buckling was performed, and a reattachment was achieved in all cases. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the last visit ranged from 20/30 to 20/25, but the BCVA in 1 eye was 20/200 because of amblyopia. We experienced 4 rare cases of a recurrent retinal detachment 10-17 years after the primary RRD. PPV and scleral buckling were effective and the anatomical and the functional outcomes were good.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33976686
doi: 10.1159/000511372
pii: cop-0012-0219
pmc: PMC8077482
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
219-226Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The following author has no financial disclosures: T.T. and T.O. T.B.: personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Kowa, personal fees from Santen, personal fees from Senju, personal fees from Alcon, grants and personal fees from Novartis, and outside the submitted work. S.Y.: grants and personal fees from HOYA, grants and personal fees from Senju, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Santen, grants and personal fees from Alcon Japan, grants and personal fees from Alcon Pharma, grants and personal fees from Bayer, grants and personal fees from Kowa, personal fees from Nikon, personal fees from Wakamoto, personal fees from Chuo Sangyo, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from Jamex, personal fees from Sun Contact Lens, personal fees from Finedex, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Chugai, personal fees from Abbvie, and outside the submitted work.
Références
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008 Nov-Dec;18(6):960-4
pubmed: 18988169
Ophthalmology. 2005 Aug;112(8):1421-9
pubmed: 15961159
Retina. 1992;12(3):224-31
pubmed: 1410830
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;252(11):1711-6
pubmed: 24668386
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;66(12):1763-1771
pubmed: 30451176
Ophthalmologica. 1977;174(4):210-6
pubmed: 859714
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2013 Jul-Aug;44(4):374-9
pubmed: 23758323
ScientificWorldJournal. 2019 Mar 6;2019:5416806
pubmed: 30956624
Ophthalmology. 2002 Oct;109(10):1821-7
pubmed: 12359601
Ophthalmology. 1990 Nov;97(11):1562-72
pubmed: 2255530