The role of family confidants and caregivers in the care of older cancer patients: Extending the concept of "shared decision-making".
family
older cancer patients
qualitative research methods
quality of life
survivorship
Journal
Health science reports
ISSN: 2398-8835
Titre abrégé: Health Sci Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101728855
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
19
02
2021
accepted:
28
03
2021
entrez:
12
5
2021
pubmed:
13
5
2021
medline:
13
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Family caregivers play an important role in assisting their family members with cancer, but their influence on the treatment decision-making process has not yet been adequately investigated. This exploratory study approached this topic via reconstructive methodology, focusing on assessing patient-caregiver relationships. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 37 mostly elderly cancer patients (median age: 74 years) about the context of their diagnosis, treatment decision, and family support. Additionally, we interviewed 34 caregivers of cancer patients. Of these, 25 were related to patients interviewed. We analyzed the interviews via a multi-step coding method informed by Grounded Theory methodology toward characterizing patient-caregiver relationships, the treatment decision-making process, and the caregivers' role therein. In the majority of cases (86%), patients were being supported by caregivers. We categorized patient-caregiver relationships in regards to the caregivers' involvement in the therapy decision-making process. We found patient-caregiver interaction patterns that indicate the potential of caregivers to decidedly influence the therapy decision-making process. Yet, only in 38% of cases, a caregiver attended relevant patient-physician-consultations. Depending on the nature of the patient-caregiver relationship, the traditional concept of shared decision-making, which assumes a dyadic relationship, needs to be extended toward a more dynamic concept in which caregivers should be involved more frequently. This could enable physicians to better understand a patient's reasons for or against a therapy proposal and ensure that the patient's wishes are communicated and considered. On the other hand, strong caregiver-involvement bears risks of over-stepping elderly patients' wishes, thus violating patient autonomy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
OBJECTIVE
Family caregivers play an important role in assisting their family members with cancer, but their influence on the treatment decision-making process has not yet been adequately investigated. This exploratory study approached this topic via reconstructive methodology, focusing on assessing patient-caregiver relationships.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted semi-structured interviews with 37 mostly elderly cancer patients (median age: 74 years) about the context of their diagnosis, treatment decision, and family support. Additionally, we interviewed 34 caregivers of cancer patients. Of these, 25 were related to patients interviewed. We analyzed the interviews via a multi-step coding method informed by Grounded Theory methodology toward characterizing patient-caregiver relationships, the treatment decision-making process, and the caregivers' role therein.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In the majority of cases (86%), patients were being supported by caregivers. We categorized patient-caregiver relationships in regards to the caregivers' involvement in the therapy decision-making process. We found patient-caregiver interaction patterns that indicate the potential of caregivers to decidedly influence the therapy decision-making process. Yet, only in 38% of cases, a caregiver attended relevant patient-physician-consultations.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Depending on the nature of the patient-caregiver relationship, the traditional concept of shared decision-making, which assumes a dyadic relationship, needs to be extended toward a more dynamic concept in which caregivers should be involved more frequently. This could enable physicians to better understand a patient's reasons for or against a therapy proposal and ensure that the patient's wishes are communicated and considered. On the other hand, strong caregiver-involvement bears risks of over-stepping elderly patients' wishes, thus violating patient autonomy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33977163
doi: 10.1002/hsr2.281
pii: HSR2281
pmc: PMC8100949
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e281Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Cancer Treat Rev. 2017 Jun;57:58-66
pubmed: 28550714
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):681-92
pubmed: 9032835
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Nov;64(5):710-1; author reply 711-3
pubmed: 17875196
Oncology (Williston Park). 2009 Apr 15;23(4):369-75
pubmed: 19476267
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Aug 31;112(35-36):577-84
pubmed: 26377529
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7
pubmed: 22618581
BMC Nephrol. 2019 Mar 1;20(1):73
pubmed: 30823872
Bioethics. 2019 May;33(4):439-447
pubmed: 31115085
Oncologist. 2018 Jul;23(7):752-754
pubmed: 29472311
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 May;188(2):379-388
pubmed: 29934872
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Apr;63(4):383-4
pubmed: 17378797
Cancers (Basel). 2011 Aug 12;3(3):3279-330
pubmed: 24212956
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016 Jan;97:247-62
pubmed: 26412718
J Geriatr Oncol. 2016 Jul;7(4):249-57
pubmed: 26725537
Oncologist. 2016 Mar;21(3):354-76
pubmed: 26921292
Qual Health Res. 2007 Oct;17(8):1137-48
pubmed: 17928484