TMT based deep proteome analysis of buffalo mammary epithelial cells and identification of novel protein signatures during lactogenic differentiation.
buffalo
differentiation
lactogenesis
mammary epithelial cells
nanoLC-MS/MS
signaling pathways
Journal
FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
ISSN: 1530-6860
Titre abrégé: FASEB J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8804484
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
revised:
09
04
2021
received:
26
11
2020
accepted:
12
04
2021
entrez:
12
5
2021
pubmed:
13
5
2021
medline:
20
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The lactating mammary gland harbours numerous matured alveoli with their lumen surrounded by differentiated mammary epithelial cells (MECs), which are exclusively involved in milk synthesis and secretion. Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) is the second major milk-producing animal, and its physiology is different from cattle. The complete protein machinery involved in MECs differentiation is still not defined in ruminants, in particular, buffalo. Therefore, we have studied the differential expression of regulated proteins in the in vitro grown buffalo MECs (BuMECs) at different time points (on 3, 6, 12, and 15 days) of their differentiation in the presence of lactogenic hormones. TMT-based MS analysis identified 4,934 proteins; of them, 681 were differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). The principal component analysis suggested a highly heterogeneous expression of DEPs at the four-time points of hormone treatment, with most of them (307) attained the highest expression on 12 days. Bioinformatics analysis revealed the association of DEPs with 24 KEGG pathways. We observed few new proteins, namely ABCA13, IVL, VPS37, CZIB, RFX7, Rab5, TTLL12, SMEK1, GDI2, and TMEM131 in BuMECs. The function of one of the highly upregulated proteins, namely involucrin in the differentiation of BuMECs was confirmed based on biochemical inhibition assay. The results further conclude that the proteins with higher abundance can be considered as the potential biomarkers for differentiation, and they may have a significant association with the lactation process in buffalo too. The proteome dataset obtained can be used to understand the species-specific variations among other lactating animals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33977573
doi: 10.1096/fj.202002476RR
doi:
Substances chimiques
Milk Proteins
0
Proteome
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e21621Informations de copyright
© 2021 Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
Références
Montévil M, Speroni L, Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. Modeling mammary organogenesis from biological first principles: cells and their physical constraints. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2016;122:58-69.
Oakes SR, Hilton HN, Ormandy CJ. The alveolar switch: coordinating the proliferative cues and cell fate decisions that drive the formation of lobuloalveoli from ductal epithelium. Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8:207
Bruckmaier RM, Blum JW. Oxytocin release and milk removal in ruminants. J Dairy Sci. 1998;81:939-949.
Akers RM, Capuco AV, Keys JE. Mammary histology and alveolar cell differentiation during late gestation and early lactation in mammary tissue of beef and dairy heifers. Livestock Sci. 2006;105:44-49.
Xu R, Spencer VA, Bissell MJ. Extracellular matrix-regulated gene expression requires cooperation of SWI/SNF and transcription factors. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:14992-14999.
Levine JF, Stockdale FE. Cell-cell interactions promote mammary epithelial cell differentiation. J Cell Biol. 1985;100:1415-1422.
Haaksma CJ, Schwartz RJ, Tomasek JJ. Myoepithelial cell contraction and milk ejection are impaired in mammary glands of mice lacking smooth muscle alpha-actin. Biol Reprod. 2011;85:13-21.
Soule HD, Maloney TM, Wolman SR, et al. Isolation and characterization of a spontaneously immortalized human breast epithelial cell line, MCF-10. Cancer Res. 1990;50:6075-6086.
Huynh HT, Robitaille G, Turner JD. Establishment of bovine mammary epithelial cells (MAC-T): an in vitro model for bovine lactation. Exp Cell Res. 1991;197:191-199.
Anand V, Dogra N, Singh S, et al. Establishment and characterization of a buffalo (Bubalusbubalis) mammary epithelial cell line. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40469.
Fu M, Chen Y, Xiong X, Lan D, Li J. Establishment of mammary gland model in vitro: culture and evaluation of a Yak mammary epithelial cell line. PLoS One. 2014;9:e113669.
Dzięgelewska Ż, Gajewska M. Stromal-epithelial interactions during mammary gland development. In: Valarmathi MT, ed. Stromal Cells-Structure, Function, and Therapeutic Implications. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2018: 87-118.
Gordon KE, Binas B, Chapman RS, et al. A novel cell culture model for studying differentiation and apoptosis in the mouse mammary gland. Breast Cancer Res. 2000;2:222-235.
McGrath CM. Cell organization and responsiveness to hormones in vitro: genesis of domes in mammary cell cultures. Am Zool. 1975;15:231-236.
Kubista M, Rosner M, Kubista E, Bernaschek G, Hengstschläger M. Brca1 regulates in vitro differentiation of mammary epithelial cells. Oncogene. 2002;21:4747-4756.
Geletu M, Hoskin V, Starova B, et al. Differentiation of mouse breast epithelial HC11 and EpH4 cells. J Visualized Experiments. 2020;156:e60147.
Liu F, Pawliwec A, Feng Z, Yasruel Z, Lebrun JJ, Ali S. Prolactin/Jak2 directs apical/basal polarization and luminal linage maturation of mammary epithelial cells through regulation of the Erk1/2 pathway. Stem Cell Res. 2015;15:376-383.
Itoh M, Bissell MJ. The organization of tight junctions in epithelia: implications for mammary gland biology and breast tumorigenesis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2003;8:449-462.
Bionaz M, Loor JJ. Gene networks driving bovine mammaryprotein synthesis during the lactation cycle. Bioinform Biol Insights. 2011;5:83-98.
Yan Q, Tang S, Tan Z, et al. Proteomic analysis of isolated plasma membrane fractions from themammary gland in lactating cows. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63:7388-7398.
Pauloin A, Chanat E. Prolactin and epidermal growth factor stimulate adipophilin synthesis in HC11 mouse mammary epithelial cells via the PI3-kinase/Akt/mTOR pathway. Biochimica et BiophysicaActa (BBA)-Mol Cell Res. 2012;1823:987-996.
Bionaz M, Hurley W, Loor J. Milk protein synthesis in the lactatingmammary gland: Insights from transcriptomics analyzes. In: Hurley W, ed. Milk Protein vol. 11. London, UK: In Tech; 2012:285-324.
Perišić P, Bogdanović V, Mekić C, et al. The importance of buffalo in milk production and buffalo population in Serbia. Biotechnol Anim Husbandry. 2015;31:255-263.
Han X, Lee FL, Zhang L, Guo MR. Chemical composition of water buffalo milk and its low-fat symbiotic yogurt development. Funct Foods Health Dis. 2012;2:86-106.
Kashwa M. Composition of water buffalo milk during the first period of lactation-relation to mozzarella cheese properties. Degree Proj Anim Science. 2016;548:1-42.
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25:402-408.
Kapila N, Kishore A, Sodhi M, et al. Identification of appropriate reference genes for qPCR analysis of heat-stressed mammary epithelial cells in riverine buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Int Scholarly Res Notices. 2013;2013:1-9.
Hummon AB, Lim SR, Difilippantonio MJ, Ried T. Isolation and solubilisation of proteins after TRIzol ® extraction of RNA and DNA from patient material following prolonged storage. Biotechniques. 2007;42:467-472.
Simões AES, Pereira DM, Amaral JD, et al. Efficient recovery of proteins from multiple source samples after TRIzol ® or TRIzol ® LS RNA extraction and long-term storage. BMC Genom. 2013;14:181.
Jaswal S, Anand V, Kumar S, et al. In-depth proteome analysis of more than 12,500 proteins in buffalo mammary epithelial cell line identifies protein signatures for active proliferation and lactation. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1-13.
Chen SJ, Liao DL, Chen CH, Wang TY, Chen KC. Construction and analysis of protein-protein interaction network of heroin use disorder. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1-9.
Janjanam J, Jamwal M, Singh S, et al. Proteome analysis of functionally differentiated bovine (Bos indicus) mammary epithelial cells isolated from milk. Proteomics. 2013;13:3189-3204.
Tanjore H, Kalluri R. The role of type IV collagen and basement membranes in cancer progression and metastasis. Am J Pathol. 2006;168:715-717.
Riddle O, Bates RW, Dykshorn SW. The preparation, identification and assay of prolactin- a hormone of the anterior pituitary. Am J Physiol-Legacy Content. 1933;105:191-216.
Gouilleux F, Wakao H, Mundt M, Groner B. Prolactin induces phosphorylation of Tyr694 of Stat5 (MGF), a prerequisite for DNA binding and induction of transcription. EMBO J. 1994;13:4361-4369.
Desrivières S, Prinz T, Laria NCP, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of proliferating and functionallydifferentiated mammary epithelial cells. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2003;2:1039-1054.
Janjanam J, Singh S, Jena MK, et al. Comparative 2D-DIGE proteomic analysis of bovine mammary epithelial cells during lactation reveals protein signatures for lactation persistency and milk yield. PLoS One. 2014;9:e102515.
Arora R, Sharma A, Sharma U, et al. Buffalo milk transcriptome: a comparative analysis of early, mid and late lactation. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5993.
Blanchard AA, Ma X, Dueck KJ, et al. Claudin 1 expression in basal-like breast cancer is related to patient age. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:268.
Zhang H, Liu Y, Weng J, et al. Decrease of lactogenic hormones induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition via TGFβ1 and arachidonic acid during mammary gland involution. J Reprod Develop. 2017;63:325-332.
Cerri RLA, Thompson IM, Kim IH, et al. Effects of lactation and pregnancy on gene expression of endometrium of Holstein cows at day 17 of the estrous cycle or pregnancy. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95:5657-5675.
Alhussien MN, Dang AK. Milk somatic cells, factors influencing their release, future prospects, and practical utility in dairy animals: an overview. Veterinary World. 2018;11:562.
Roth L, Srivastava S, Lindzen M, et al. SILAC identifies LAD1 as a filamin-binding regulator of actin dynamics in response to EGF and a marker of aggressive breast tumors. Sci Signal. 2018;30:11.
Mohammad MA, Hadsell DL, Haymond MW. Gene regulation of UDP-galactose synthesis and transport: potential rate-limiting processes in initiation of milk production in humans. Am J Physiol-Endocrinol Metabol. 2012;303:E365-E376.
Muroya S, Hagi T, Kimura A, Aso H, Matsuzaki M, Nomura M. Lactogenic hormones alter cellular and extracellular microRNA expression in bovine mammary epithelial cell culture. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2016;7:8.
Chawla G, Lin C-H, Han A, Shiue L, Ares M, Black DL. Sam68 regulates a set of alternatively spliced exons during neurogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:201-213.
Mani O, Sorensen MT, Sejrsen K, Bruckmaier RM, Albrecht C. Differential expression and localization of lipid transporters in the bovine mammary gland during the pregnancy-lactation cycle. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:3744-3756.
Rhoads RE, Grudzien-Nogalska E. Translational regulation of milk protein synthesis at secretory activation. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2007;12:283-292.
Jiang LI, Liu J, Sun D, et al. Genome wide association studies for milk production traits in Chinese Holstein population. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13661.
Minozzi G, Nicolazzi EL, Stella A, et al. Genome wide analysis of fertility and production traits in Italian Holstein cattle. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80219.
Bissonnette N. Genetic association of variations in the osteopontin gene (SPP1) with lactation persistency in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101:456-461.
Dai WT, Zou YX, White RR, Liu JX, Liu HY. Transcriptomic profiles of the bovine mammary gland during lactation and the dry period. Funct Integr Genomics. 2018;18:125-140.
Li Z, Srivastava P. Heat shock proteins. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2003;58:A-1T.
Theerawatanasirikul S, Sailasuta A, Thanawongnuwech R, Suriyaphol G. Alterations of keratins, involucrin and filaggrin gene expression in canine atopic dermatitis. Res Vet Sci. 2012;93:1287-1292.
Bambhroliya A, Van Wyhe RD, Kumar S, et al. Gene set analysis of post-lactational mammary gland involution gene signatures in inflammatory and triple-negative breast cancer. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0192689.
Arora R, Sharma A, Sharma U, et al. Buffalo milk transcriptome: a comparative analysis of early, mid and late lactation. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1-9.
Ly T, Endo A, Brenes A, et al. Proteome-wide analysis of protein abundance and turnover remodelling during oncogenic transformation of human breast epithelial cells. Wellcome Open Research. 2018;3:51.
Bretland AJ, Lawry J, Sharrard RM. A study of death by anoikis in cultured epithelial cells. Cell Prolif. 2001;34:199-210.
Williams ML, Rutherford SL, Feingold KR. Effects of cholesterol sulfate on lipid metabolism in cultured human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. J Lipid Res. 1987;28:955-967.
Hanley K, Wood L, Ng DC, et al. Cholesterol sulfate stimulates involucrin transcription in keratinocytes by increasing Fra-1, Fra-2, and Jun D. J Lipid Res. 2001;42:390-398.
Mailleux AA, Overholtzer M, Brugge JS. Lumen formation during mammary epithelial morphogenesis: insights from in vitro and in vivo models. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:57-62.
Gillespie MJ, Crowley TM, Haring VR, et al. Transcriptome analysis of pigeon milk production-role of cornification and triglyceride synthesis genes. BMC Genom. 2013;14:1-12.
Mailleux AA, Overholtzer M, Schmelzle T, Bouillet P, Strasser A, Brugge JS. BIM regulates apoptosis during mammary ductal morphogenesis, and its absence reveals alternative cell death mechanisms. Dev Cell. 2007;12:221-234.
Lowdon RF, Zhang BO, Bilenky M, et al. Regulatory network decoded from epigenomes of surface ectoderm-derived cell types. Nat Commun. 2014;5:1-11.
Modregger J, Ritter B, Witter B, Paulsson M, Plomann M. All three PACSIN isoforms bind to endocytic proteins and inhibit endocytosis. J Cell Sci. 2000;113:4511-4521.
Meng H, Tian L, Zhou J, et al. PACSIN 2 represses cellular migration through direct association with cyclin D1 but not its alternate splice form cyclin D1b. Cell Cycle. 2011;10:73-81.
de Koning PJ, Bovenschen N, Leusink FK, et al. Downregulation of SERPINB13 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas associates with poor clinical outcome. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:1542-1550.
Welss T, Sun J, Irving JA, et al. Hurpin is a selective inhibitor of lysosomal cathepsin L and protects keratinocytes from ultraviolet-induced apoptosis. Biochemistry. 2003;42:7381-7389.
Townson SM, Dobrzycka KM, Lee AV, et al. SAFB2, a new scaffold attachment factor homolog and estrogen receptor corepressor. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:20059-20068.
Rios AC, Fu NY, Jamieson PR, et al. Essential role for a novel population of binucleated mammary epithelial cells in lactation. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11400.
Prinz E, Aviram S, Aronheim A. WDR62 mediates TNFα-dependent JNK activation via TRAF2-MLK3 axis. Mol Biol Cell. 2018;29:2470-2480.
Liao L, Song M, Li X, et al. E3 ubiquitin ligase UBR5 drives the growth and metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer. Can Res. 2017;77:2090-2101.
Mattissek C, Teis D. The role of the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) in tumorigenesis. Mol Membr Biol. 2014;31:111-119.
Furukawa Y, Lim C, Tosha T, et al. Identification of a novel zinc-binding protein, C1orf123, as an interactor with a heavy metal-associated domain. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0204355.
A. Rahaman SN, Mat Yusop J, Mohamed-Hussein Z-A, et al. Crystal structure and functional analysis of human C1ORF123. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5377.
Han Y, Sanford L, Simpson DM, Dowell RD, Palmer AE. Remodeling of Zn2+ homeostasis upon differentiation of mammary epithelial cells. Metallomics. 2020;12:346-362.
Bridgewater RE, Streuli CH, Caswell PT. Extracellular matrix promotes clathrin-dependent endocytosis of prolactin and STAT5 activation in differentiating mammary epithelial cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:4572.
Dirac-Svejstrup AB, Soldati T, Shapiro AD, Pfeffer SR. Rab-GDI presents functional Rab9 to the intracellular transport machinery and contributes selectivity to Rab9 membrane recruitment. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:15427-15430.
Kim BR, Seo SH, Park MS, Lee SH, Kwon Y, Rho SB. sMEK1 inhibits endothelial cell proliferation by attenuating VEGFR-2-dependent-Akt/eNOS/HIF-1α signalling pathways. Oncotarget. 2015;6:31830-31843.