Efficient and gentle delivery of molecules into cells with different elasticity
Journal
Lab on a chip
ISSN: 1473-0189
Titre abrégé: Lab Chip
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101128948
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 06 2021
15 06 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
13
5
2021
medline:
29
6
2021
entrez:
12
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Intracellular delivery of cargo molecules such as membrane-impermeable proteins or drugs is crucial for cell treatment in biological and medical applications. Recently, microfluidic mechanoporation techniques have enabled transfection of previously inaccessible cells. These techniques create transient pores in the cell membrane by shear-induced or constriction contact-based rapid cell deformation. However, cells deform and recover differently from a given extent of shear stress or compression and it is unclear how the underlying mechanical properties affect the delivery efficiency of molecules into cells. In this study, we identify cell elasticity as a key mechanical determinant of delivery efficiency leading to the development of "progressive mechanoporation" (PM), a novel mechanoporation method that improves delivery efficiency into cells of different elasticity. PM is based on a multistage cell deformation, through a combination of hydrodynamic forces that pre-deform cells followed by their contact-based compression inside a PDMS-based device controlled by a pressure-based microfluidic controller. PM allows processing of small sample volumes (about 20 μL) with high-throughput (>10 000 cells per s), while controlling both operating pressure and flow rate for a reliable and reproducible cell treatment. We find that uptake of molecules of different sizes is correlated with cell elasticity whereby delivery efficiency of small and big molecules is favoured in more compliant and stiffer cells, respectively. A possible explanation for this opposite trend is a different size, number and lifetime of opened pores. Our data demonstrates that PM reliably and reproducibly delivers impermeable cargo of the size of small molecule inhibitors such as 4 kDa FITC-dextran with >90% efficiency into cells of different mechanical properties without affecting their viability and proliferation rates. Importantly, also much larger cargos such as a >190 kDa Cas9 protein-sgRNA complex are efficiently delivered high-lighting the biological, biomedical and clinical applicability of our findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33977944
doi: 10.1039/d0lc01224f
pmc: PMC8204113
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2437-2452Références
Small. 2020 Jan;16(2):e1903857
pubmed: 31782912
Int J Stem Cells. 2012 May;5(1):6-11
pubmed: 24298349
Science. 2017 Jun 9;356(6342):1022-1025
pubmed: 28596334
Nano Lett. 2018 Apr 11;18(4):2705-2710
pubmed: 29569926
Lab Chip. 2006 Jan;6(1):83-9
pubmed: 16372073
Biophys J. 2005 May;88(5):3689-98
pubmed: 15722433
Sci Rep. 2015 May 22;5:10276
pubmed: 25999171
Physiol Rev. 2015 Oct;95(4):1205-40
pubmed: 26336031
Nat Mater. 2014 Jun;13(6):638-644
pubmed: 24747782
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016 Mar;17(3):183-93
pubmed: 26883003
J Cell Sci. 2001 Oct;114(Pt 19):3487-94
pubmed: 11682608
Lab Chip. 2019 May 14;19(10):1747-1754
pubmed: 30964485
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 13;115(46):E10907-E10914
pubmed: 30381459
Science. 2018 Jan 12;359(6372):
pubmed: 29326244
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008 Mar 1;99(4):846-54
pubmed: 17879304
Nat Methods. 2018 Jul;15(7):491-498
pubmed: 29915189
Biomed Microdevices. 2018 Jun 25;20(3):52
pubmed: 29938310
Genome Res. 2014 Jun;24(6):1012-9
pubmed: 24696461
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
J Cell Sci. 1992 Jul;102 ( Pt 3):533-41
pubmed: 1506433
Nature. 2016 Oct 12;538(7624):183-192
pubmed: 27734871
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017 Feb;16(2):115-130
pubmed: 27980341
Nat Protoc. 2010 Mar;5(3):491-502
pubmed: 20203666
Nat Methods. 2015 Mar;12(3):199-202, 4 p following 202
pubmed: 25643151
ACS Chem Biol. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):2970-2974
pubmed: 29088528
Drug Deliv. 2018 Nov;25(1):1234-1257
pubmed: 29801422
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1678:347-369
pubmed: 29071686
Nat Rev Genet. 2011 May;12(5):301-15
pubmed: 21445084
Small. 2016 Nov;12(42):5873-5881
pubmed: 27594517
Cell Rep. 2017 May 30;19(9):1953-1966
pubmed: 28564611
Integr Biol (Camb). 2014 Apr;6(4):470-5
pubmed: 24496115
Mater Today (Kidlington). 2018 Sep;21(7):703-712
pubmed: 30288138
ACS Nano. 2020 Mar 24;14(3):3048-3058
pubmed: 32069037
Chem Sci. 2018 Aug 20;9(40):7835-7842
pubmed: 30429993
Anal Chem. 2018 Feb 6;90(3):1836-1844
pubmed: 29308899
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 5;110(6):2082-7
pubmed: 23341631
Integr Biol (Camb). 2016 May 16;8(5):645-53
pubmed: 26956582
Biophys J. 2015 Nov 17;109(10):2023-36
pubmed: 26588562
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2003;19:697-731
pubmed: 14570587
Cancer Res. 2009 Mar 1;69(5):1728-32
pubmed: 19223529
Chem Rev. 2018 Aug 22;118(16):7409-7531
pubmed: 30052023
Biophys J. 2021 Mar 2;120(5):855-865
pubmed: 33545102