Distinguishing between household headship with and without power and its association with subjective well-being among older adults: an analytical cross-sectional study in India.
Household headship
India
Older adults
Subjective wellbeing
Journal
BMC geriatrics
ISSN: 1471-2318
Titre abrégé: BMC Geriatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968548
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 05 2021
12 05 2021
Historique:
received:
23
02
2021
accepted:
30
04
2021
entrez:
13
5
2021
pubmed:
14
5
2021
medline:
5
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The status of household headship accorded to the older members of the family is often symbolic and seldom vested with some control over resources. The increased dependency and diminished ability to contribute to household economy are major factors that lead to a decline in the respect accorded to older people and their status in the family. The present study aimed to understand the distinction between the functional and nominal household headship status of older adults based on their decision-making power and examine how it is associated with their subjective well-being. The present research used data from the 'Building a Knowledge Base on Population Aging in India' (BKPAI) which is nationally representative. The survey was conducted in 2011, across seven states of India. Descriptive statistics along with percentage distribution were calculated for subjective well-being over explanatory variables. For finding the association between subjective well-being over explanatory variables, binary logistic regression model was used. The mean age of the study population was 68 years [CI: 67.8-68.2]. About 5 % of older adults had nominal while 95% had functional headship status. The prevalence of low subjective well-being (LSWB) was significantly higher among older adults with nominal headship status (58%) than functional headship status (23%). After controlling for several other variables, older adults with nominal headship status were 59% significantly more likely to have low subjective well-being than individuals with functional headship status (OR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.10, 2.31). Further, older adults with psychological distress, chronic morbidity, poor self-reported health, no community involvement and no one to trust on were at higher risk of LSWB than their counterparts. Findings suggest that older adults who do not have a household headship with power with active participation in household decision-making as well as those who have no involvement in social activities or have poor health conditions need to be given more attention. Thus, to keep a large proportion of older population gainfully engaged, their care and support should be ensured via providing appropriate services that would enhance their roles and responsibilities and overall wellbeing.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The status of household headship accorded to the older members of the family is often symbolic and seldom vested with some control over resources. The increased dependency and diminished ability to contribute to household economy are major factors that lead to a decline in the respect accorded to older people and their status in the family. The present study aimed to understand the distinction between the functional and nominal household headship status of older adults based on their decision-making power and examine how it is associated with their subjective well-being.
METHOD
The present research used data from the 'Building a Knowledge Base on Population Aging in India' (BKPAI) which is nationally representative. The survey was conducted in 2011, across seven states of India. Descriptive statistics along with percentage distribution were calculated for subjective well-being over explanatory variables. For finding the association between subjective well-being over explanatory variables, binary logistic regression model was used.
RESULTS
The mean age of the study population was 68 years [CI: 67.8-68.2]. About 5 % of older adults had nominal while 95% had functional headship status. The prevalence of low subjective well-being (LSWB) was significantly higher among older adults with nominal headship status (58%) than functional headship status (23%). After controlling for several other variables, older adults with nominal headship status were 59% significantly more likely to have low subjective well-being than individuals with functional headship status (OR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.10, 2.31). Further, older adults with psychological distress, chronic morbidity, poor self-reported health, no community involvement and no one to trust on were at higher risk of LSWB than their counterparts.
CONCLUSIONS
Findings suggest that older adults who do not have a household headship with power with active participation in household decision-making as well as those who have no involvement in social activities or have poor health conditions need to be given more attention. Thus, to keep a large proportion of older population gainfully engaged, their care and support should be ensured via providing appropriate services that would enhance their roles and responsibilities and overall wellbeing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33980164
doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02256-0
pii: 10.1186/s12877-021-02256-0
pmc: PMC8114520
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
304Références
Health Place. 2017 Sep;47:80-89
pubmed: 28778036
Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(4):462-71
pubmed: 22300005
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 8;16(3):e0247943
pubmed: 33684164
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2006 Sep-Dec;21(3-4):103-20
pubmed: 17242992
SSM Popul Health. 2019 Jun 29;8:100423
pubmed: 31321278
J Popul Econ. 2020 Sep 9;:1-50
pubmed: 32929308
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jan 29;21(1):85
pubmed: 33514331
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Nov 25;12:100702
pubmed: 33304986
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017 Jun 12;24(2):162-170
pubmed: 28664687
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2016 Mar;31(1):89-111
pubmed: 26797966
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Jan 17;14:5
pubmed: 25595196
Psychol Bull. 2008 Jul;134(4):536-60
pubmed: 18605819
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0249828
pubmed: 33852617
Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:383-409
pubmed: 19575618
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 1995 Sep;10(3):175-98
pubmed: 24389836
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):545
pubmed: 33740942
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Feb;74(4):588-96
pubmed: 22226156
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 7;21(1):179
pubmed: 33823847
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2001;53(3):181-94
pubmed: 11866377