Economic Evaluations of Interventions to Optimize Medication Use in Older Adults with Polypharmacy and Multimorbidity: A Systematic Review.
cost-benefit
cost-effectiveness
cost-utility
economic evaluation
polypharmacy
potentially inappropriate medication
Journal
Clinical interventions in aging
ISSN: 1178-1998
Titre abrégé: Clin Interv Aging
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101273480
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
03
02
2021
accepted:
31
03
2021
entrez:
13
5
2021
pubmed:
14
5
2021
medline:
16
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To conduct a systematic review of the economic impact of interventions intended at optimizing medication use in older adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. We searched Ovid-Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Ageline, Cochrane, and Web of Science, for articles published between 2004 and 2020 that studied older adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. The intervention studied had to be aimed at optimizing medication use and present results on costs. Out of 3,871 studies identified by the search strategy, eleven studies were included. The interventions involved different provider types, with a majority described as a multidisciplinary team involving a pharmacist and a general practitioner, in the decision-making process. Interventions were generally associated with a reduction in medication expenditure. The benefits of the intervention in terms of clinical outcomes remain limited. Five studies were cost-benefit analyses, which had a net benefit that was either null or positive. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios that were generally within the willingness-to-pay thresholds of the countries in which the studies were conducted. However, the quality of the studies was generally low. Omission of key cost elements of economic evaluations, including intervention cost and payer perspective, limited interpretability. Interventions to optimize medication use may provide benefits that outweigh their implementation costs, but the evidence remains limited. There is a need to identify and address barriers to the scaling-up of such interventions, starting with the current incentive structures for pharmacists, physicians, and patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33981140
doi: 10.2147/CIA.S304074
pii: 304074
pmc: PMC8108125
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
767-779Informations de copyright
© 2021 Laberge et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Dr Caroline Sirois reports grants from Fonds de recherche du Québec, during the conduct of the study. The authors declare that they have no other potential conflicts of interest for this work.
Références
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Apr;59(4):586-93
pubmed: 21453379
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2013 Oct;38(5):360-72
pubmed: 23550814
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(4):494-503
pubmed: 29019297
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Dec;18(9):1069-1078
pubmed: 27913940
Pharm World Sci. 2010 Apr;32(2):130-8
pubmed: 20016934
Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Aug 29;7(3):
pubmed: 31470621
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Sep;57(542):723-31
pubmed: 17761060
Drugs Aging. 2018 Aug;35(8):751-762
pubmed: 30003429
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):e021832
pubmed: 30705233
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Jan;64(1):22-30
pubmed: 26782849
Rev Saude Publica. 2019 Jan 31;53:7
pubmed: 30726488
J Formos Med Assoc. 2018 Mar;117(3):235-243
pubmed: 28549592
Syst Rev. 2017 May 19;6(1):104
pubmed: 28526062
J Manag Care Pharm. 2003 Jan-Feb;9(1):53-61
pubmed: 14613362
Ageing Res Rev. 2017 Aug;37:53-68
pubmed: 28511964
BMJ. 2016 Aug 18;354:i4189
pubmed: 27540015
Drug Saf. 2016 Jan;39(1):79-87
pubmed: 26553305
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64
pubmed: 19622511
Gac Sanit. 2019 Mar - Apr;33(2):106-111
pubmed: 29162290
Clin Ther. 2009 Sep;31(9):2018-37
pubmed: 19843492
Aten Primaria. 2005 May 31;35(9):472-7
pubmed: 15919021
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Aug;41(4):963-971
pubmed: 31209718
Int J Pharm Pract. 2015 Dec;23(6):407-14
pubmed: 25847545
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 21;10(1):e0115796
pubmed: 25607642
Pharmacoecon Open. 2020 Mar;4(1):27-36
pubmed: 31218653
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Aug 1;176(8):1114-1122
pubmed: 27322350
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Dec;58(6):648-64
pubmed: 15563363
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Mar;47(3):533-43
pubmed: 2316538
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Sep;82(3):831-8
pubmed: 27195696
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jan;70(1):1-11
pubmed: 24019054
CMAJ. 2006 Aug 15;175(4):342
pubmed: 16908889
J Med Econ. 2016;19(3):213-28
pubmed: 26478982