The opioid sparing effect of erector spinae plane block for various surgeries: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.


Journal

Minerva anestesiologica
ISSN: 1827-1596
Titre abrégé: Minerva Anestesiol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 0375272

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 14 5 2021
medline: 25 9 2021
entrez: 13 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a newer fascial plane block which has been broadly applied for postoperative analgesia after various surgeries, but the effectiveness in these populations is not well established. A systematic database search was conducted in PubMed, PMC, Embase, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ESPB with control, placebo, or other blocks. The primary outcome was intravenous opioid consumption in milligram morphine equivalents 24 h after surgery. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. A total of 29 RCTs were included. An analysis was conducted by subgroups differentiated by surgery type, 'no block' vs. ESPB, and other blocks vs. ESPB. ESPB was effective in reducing opioid consumption against no block for breast surgery (SMD -1.13; 95% CI), thoracic surgery (SMD -3.00; 95% CI), and vertebral surgery (SMD -1.78; 95% CI). ESPB was effective against alternative blocks for breast surgery (vs. paravertebral, SMD -1.07; 95% CI) and abdominal surgery (SMD -1.77; 95% CI). ESPB showed moderate effect in thoracic surgery against paravertebral (SMD 0.58; 95% CI) and against no block in abdominal surgery (SMD 0.80; 95% CI). In only one case did ESPB perform worse than another block: vs. PECS block for breast surgery (SMD 1.66; 95% CI). ESPB may be a useful addition to the multimodal analgesic regimen for a variety of surgeries especially when the alternative is no block. Unanswered questions include determining of the mechanism of action, refining of the EPSB technique, and establishing recommended local anesthetic dose and volume.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33982985
pii: S0375-9393.21.15356-8
doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.21.15356-8
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics, Opioid 0
Anesthetics, Local 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

903-914

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Andrea Fanelli (A)

Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Unit, Department of Emergency and Urgency, S. Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic Hospital, Bologna, Italy.

Vito Torrano (V)

Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit 1, Department of Emergency and Urgency, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Crispiana Cozowicz (C)

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Edward R Mariano (ER)

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Eleonora Balzani (E)

Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy - eleonora.balzani2@gmail.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH