Adaptation of the Quality of Life Adolescent Cleft Questionnaire for Spanish children and adolescents with cleft lip and/or palate.
cleft lip
cleft palate
factor analysis
quality of life
validation study
Journal
International journal of paediatric dentistry
ISSN: 1365-263X
Titre abrégé: Int J Paediatr Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9107511
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
revised:
27
04
2021
received:
12
01
2021
accepted:
05
05
2021
pubmed:
14
5
2021
medline:
11
2
2022
entrez:
13
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Quality of Life Adolescent Cleft Questionnaire is a measure of quality of life in cleft lip/palate (CL/P) and includes items on pre-treatment and post-treatment status. Items, however, were originally organized in a factor structure that prevents a formal pre-treatment to post-treatment comparison. Additionally, the questionnaire was tested in older patients. We aimed to explore a factor structure that allows a comparison of pre- to post-treatment status in children and adolescents with CL/P. The sample comprised 60 children and adolescents with CL/P. The scale was divided into two groups of items (24 comparing pre-treatment and post-treatment status and 26 measuring current quality of life). Two different exploratory and confirmatory analyses were conducted (one for each group of items). Sources of criterion validity were investigated with measures of self-esteem and self-efficacy. The results supported a 6-factor structure for the pre-treatment and post-treatment items. In the second group of items, 9 items were removed due to inadequate functioning and a final 4-factor solution was obtained. The criterion validity of factors was good. The proposed factor solution might be more useful to detect the perceived satisfaction in different areas and can be used in younger patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Quality of Life Adolescent Cleft Questionnaire is a measure of quality of life in cleft lip/palate (CL/P) and includes items on pre-treatment and post-treatment status. Items, however, were originally organized in a factor structure that prevents a formal pre-treatment to post-treatment comparison. Additionally, the questionnaire was tested in older patients.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to explore a factor structure that allows a comparison of pre- to post-treatment status in children and adolescents with CL/P.
DESIGN
METHODS
The sample comprised 60 children and adolescents with CL/P. The scale was divided into two groups of items (24 comparing pre-treatment and post-treatment status and 26 measuring current quality of life). Two different exploratory and confirmatory analyses were conducted (one for each group of items). Sources of criterion validity were investigated with measures of self-esteem and self-efficacy.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The results supported a 6-factor structure for the pre-treatment and post-treatment items. In the second group of items, 9 items were removed due to inadequate functioning and a final 4-factor solution was obtained. The criterion validity of factors was good.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed factor solution might be more useful to detect the perceived satisfaction in different areas and can be used in younger patients.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
157-168Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry published by BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Tannure PN, Soares FMM, Küchler EC, Motta LG, Costa MC, Granjeiro JM. Measuring the impact of quality of life of children treated for orofacial clefts: A case-control study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;37(4):381-384. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.37.4.f185423j04m66753
Crerand CE, Conrad AL, Albert M, et al. The Americleft psychosocial outcomes project: A multicenter approach to advancing psychosocial outcomes for youth with cleft lip and palate. Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2017;5(1):65-76. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpp0000172
Crerand CE, Kapa HM, Litteral J, Pearson GD, Eastman K, Kirschner RE. Identifying psychosocial risk factors among families of children with craniofacial conditions: Validation of the psychosocial assessment tool-craniofacial version. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2018;55(4):536-545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665617748010
Vuletić M, Gabrić D, Sušić M, et al. Development of a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of quality of life in parents of children with clefts. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;29(3):360-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2019.11.002
Rodríguez Dehlia C, Mosquera Tenreirob C, García López E, et al. Epidemiología de las fisuras labiales y palatinas durante los años 1990-2004 en Asturias. Anales de Pediatría. 2010;73(3):132-137.
Yáñez-Vico RM, Iglesias-Linares A, Gómez-Mendo I, et al. A descriptive epidemiologic study of cleft lip and palate in Spain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;114(SUPPL. 5):S1-S4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.07.046
Leopoldo-Rodado M, Pantoja-Pertegal F, Belmonte-caro R, Garcia-perla A. Quality of life in early age Spanish children treated for cleft lip and / or palate : a case-control study approach. Clin Oral Investig. Published online; 2020.
Agnew CM, Foster Page L, Hibbert S. Validity and reliability of the COHIP-SF in Australian children with orofacial cleft. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017;27(6):574-582. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12329
Tsangaris E, Riff KWYW, Vargas F, et al. Translation and cultural adaptation of the CLEFT-Q for use in Colombia, Chile, and Spain. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0805-7
Ranganathan K, Shapiro D, Carlozzi NE, et al. The feasibility and validity of PROMIS: a novel measure of quality of life among children with cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(4):675e-681e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002541
Wong Riff KWY, Tsangaris E, Forrest CR, et al. CLEFT-Q: detecting differences in outcomes among 2434 patients with varying cleft types. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(1):78e-88e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005723
Sischo L, Wilson-Genderson M, Broder HL. Quality-of-life in children with orofacial clefts and caregiver well-being. J Dent Res. 2017;96(13):1474-1481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517725707
Menon A, Krishnan S, Shetty V. Development and application of a novel patient-reported outcome measure on QoL and facial aesthetics-a study on south indian population. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2019;56(10):1340-1352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665619852571
Blome C, Augustin M. Measuring change in quality of life: Bias in prospective and retrospective evaluation. Value Heal. 2015;18(1):110-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.10.007
Montes ABM, Oliveira TM, Gavião MBD, De Souza BT. Orofacial functions and quality of life in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Braz Oral Res. 2019;33:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2019.VOL33.0061
Eckstein DA, Wu RL, Akinbiyi T, Silver L, Taub PJ. Measuring quality of life in cleft lip and palate patients: Currently available patient-reported outcomes measures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):518-526. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6a67
Piombino P, Ruggiero F, Orabona GDA, et al. Development and validation of the quality-of-life adolescent cleft questionnaire in patients with cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(5):1757-1761. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001033
Glener AD, Allori AC, Shammas RL, et al. A Population-Based Exploration of the Social Implications Associated with Cleft Lip and/or Palate. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 2017;5(6):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001373
De Sousa FL, Cipriani FM, Dias Coelho F, Tavares Paes S, Elisa M, Ferreira C. Does self-esteem affect body dissatisfaction levels in female adolescents? Rev Paul Pediatría. 2014;32(3):236-240. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462201432314
[20]Bandura A, Self-efficacy. In: Encyclopedia of Mental Health. Vol 4. Academic Press; 1994:71-81.
Armum P, Chellappan K. Social and emotional self-efficacy of adolescents: measured and analysed interdependencies within and across academic achievement level. Int J Adolesc Youth. 2016;21(3):279-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2015.1067894
Barlow J, Ellard D. Psycho-educational interventions for children with chronic disease, parents and siblings: An overview of the research evidence base. Child Care Health Dev. 2004;30(6):637-645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00474.x
Pisula E, Lukowska E, Fudalej PS. Self-esteem, coping styles, and quality of life in Polish adolescents and young adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2014;51(3):290-299. https://doi.org/10.1597/13-002
Shkoukani MA, Chen M, Vong A. Cleft lip - A comprehensive review. Front Pediatr. 2013;1:1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2013.00053
Corcoran M, Karki S, Harila V, et al. Oral health-related quality of life among young adults with cleft in northern Finland. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020;6(3):305-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.284
Carrasco Ortiz MÁ, del Barrio Gándara MV. Evaluación de la autoeficacia en niños y adolescentes. Psicothema. 2002;14(2):323-332.
Prewitt Diaz JO. A cross-cultural study of the reliability of the Coopersmith Self Esteem Inventory. Educ Psychol Meas. 1984;44(3):575-581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164484443005
Brown T. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. Guildford: 2006.
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J. 1999;6(1):1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Yong AG, Pearce S. A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2013;9(2):79-94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079
[31]Muthén & Muthén. MPlus for Windows, Version 6.12. Muthén & Muthén. 2011.
Patjanasoontorn N, Pradubwong S, Mongkoltawornchai S, Phetcharat T, Chowchuen B. Development and reliability of the THAICLEFT quality of life questionnaire for children with Cleft Lip/Palate and families. J Med Assoc Thail. 2010;93(SUPPL 4):S16-8.
Anthoine E, Moret L, Regnault A, Sbille V, Hardouin JB. Sample size used to validate a scale: A review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12(1): https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0176-2
Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(5):S80-S89. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17