Learning needs, preferred learning methods and learning challenges of first five general practitioners in NHS Scotland: a qualitative study.
medical education & training
organisation of health services
primary care
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 05 2021
13 05 2021
Historique:
entrez:
14
5
2021
pubmed:
15
5
2021
medline:
5
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To identify the learning needs and preferred learning methods of First5 general practitioners (GPs) in National Health Service (NHS) Scotland. Qualitative research study using grounded theory methods. First5 GPs were interviewed in small focus groups or individual interviews in-person, or over the telephone depending on their preference. General practice in NHS Scotland. GPs, within the first 5 years of completion of GP training, who were working in NHS Scotland. Thirty-eight First5s were recruited to the study. Participants recognised that gaps in their GP training became apparent in independent practice. Some of this related to NHS appraisal and revalidation, and with the business of general practice. They were interested in learning from an older generation of GPs but perceived that preferred learning methods differed. First5 GPs were less reliant on reading journals to change their practice, preferring to find learning resources that allowed them to gain new knowledge quickly and easily. There were considerations about resilience and of the challenges of learning in remote and rural areas of NHS Scotland. This related to travel costs and time, and to accessibility of learning courses. Participants appreciated collective learning and commented about the logistics and costs of learning. Preferred learning methods and learning resources differ with First5 GPs compared with those who have been in practice for some years. Learning providers need to recognise this and take these differences into account when planning and preparing learning in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33986054
pii: bmjopen-2020-044859
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044859
pmc: PMC8126297
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e044859Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: DC works for NHS Education for Scotland (NES) and LY and CW were medical education fellows for NES.
Références
Eur J Gen Pract. 2012 Dec;18(4):229-32
pubmed: 22708502
BMJ. 2017 Jul 17;358:j3462
pubmed: 28716841
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Jul;61(588):430-1
pubmed: 21722454
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 27;9(2):e026048
pubmed: 30814114
Med Educ. 2010 Apr;44(4):412-20
pubmed: 20444077
Educ Prim Care. 2011 May;22(3):144-7
pubmed: 21640002
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 31;7(9):e017650
pubmed: 29089347
Ir J Med Sci. 2020 Feb;189(1):381-388
pubmed: 31190220
Educ Prim Care. 2010 Sep;21(5):316-9
pubmed: 20868547
Educ Prim Care. 2013 Sep;24(5):346-54
pubmed: 24041099
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Jul;61(588):e397-403
pubmed: 21722447
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Apr;67(657):e227-e237
pubmed: 28289014
Educ Prim Care. 2019 May;30(3):145-151
pubmed: 30747043