The principles of directed cell migration.
Journal
Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology
ISSN: 1471-0080
Titre abrégé: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100962782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2021
08 2021
Historique:
accepted:
30
03
2021
pubmed:
16
5
2021
medline:
29
9
2021
entrez:
15
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cells have the ability to respond to various types of environmental cues, and in many cases these cues induce directed cell migration towards or away from these signals. How cells sense these cues and how they transmit that information to the cytoskeletal machinery governing cell translocation is one of the oldest and most challenging problems in biology. Chemotaxis, or migration towards diffusible chemical cues, has been studied for more than a century, but information is just now beginning to emerge about how cells respond to other cues, such as substrate-associated cues during haptotaxis (chemical cues on the surface), durotaxis (mechanical substrate compliance) and topotaxis (geometric features of substrate). Here we propose four common principles, or pillars, that underlie all forms of directed migration. First, a signal must be generated, a process that in physiological environments is much more nuanced than early studies suggested. Second, the signal must be sensed, sometimes by cell surface receptors, but also in ways that are not entirely clear, such as in the case of mechanical cues. Third, the signal has to be transmitted from the sensing modules to the machinery that executes the actual movement, a step that often requires amplification. Fourth, the signal has to be converted into the application of asymmetric force relative to the substrate, which involves mostly the cytoskeleton, but perhaps other players as well. Use of these four pillars has allowed us to compare some of the similarities between different types of directed migration, but also to highlight the remarkable diversity in the mechanisms that cells use to respond to different cues provided by their environment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33990789
doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00366-6
pii: 10.1038/s41580-021-00366-6
pmc: PMC8663916
mid: NIHMS1761291
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
529-547Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI152517
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM130312
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : U01 EB018816
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Borrell, V. Recent advances in understanding neocortical development. F1000Res https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20332.1 (2019).
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.20332.1
pubmed: 31681469
pmcid: 6816450
Pawar, K. B., Desai, S., Bhonde, R. R., Bhole, R. P. & Deshmukh, A. A. Wound with diabetes: present scenario and future. Curr. Diabetes Rev. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573399816666200703180137 (2020).
doi: 10.2174/1573399816666200703180137
Janssen, E. & Geha, R. S. Primary immunodeficiencies caused by mutations in actin regulatory proteins. Immunol. Rev. 287, 121–134 (2019).
pubmed: 30565251
doi: 10.1111/imr.12716
Novikov, N. M., Zolotaryova, S. Y., Gautreau, A. M. & Denisov, E. V. Mutational drivers of cancer cell migration and invasion. Br. J. Cancer https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-01149-0 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01149-0
pubmed: 33204027
García-Cuesta, E. M. et al. The role of the CXCL12/CXCR4/ACKR3 axis in autoimmune diseases. Front. Endocrinol. 10, 585 (2019).
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00585
Glass, D. S. et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: molecular mechanisms and potential treatment approaches. Respir Investig. 58, 320–335 (2020).
pubmed: 32487481
doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2020.04.002
Abercrombie, M. The Croonian Lecture, 1978 - the crawling movement of metazoan cells. Proc. Royal Soc. B Biol. Sci. 207, 129–147 (1980).
Abercrombie, M., Dunn, G. A. & Heath, J. P. The shape and movement of fibroblasts in culture. Soc. Gen. Physiol. Ser. 32, 57–70 (1977).
pubmed: 333596
Sardelli, L. et al. Engineering biological gradients. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 17, 2280800019829023 (2019).
pubmed: 30803308
Buttenschön, A. & Edelstein-Keshet, L. Bridging from single to collective cell migration: a review of models and links to experiments. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008411 (2020).
pubmed: 33301528
pmcid: 7728230
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008411
Wilkinson, P. C. Random locomotion; chemotaxis and chemokinesis. a guide to terms defining cell locomotion. Immunol. Today 6, 273–278 (1985).
pubmed: 25290568
doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(85)90066-0
Petrie, R. J., Doyle, A. D. & Yamada, K. M. Random versus directionally persistent cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 538–549 (2009).
pubmed: 19603038
pmcid: 2752299
doi: 10.1038/nrm2729
Dorward, D. A. et al. The role of formylated peptides and formyl peptide receptor 1 in governing neutrophil function during acute inflammation. Am. J. Pathol. 185, 1172–1184 (2015).
pubmed: 25791526
pmcid: 4419282
doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.01.020
Ehrengruber, M. U., Geiser, T. & Deranleau, D. A. Activation of human neutrophils by C3a and C5A. Comparison of the effects on shape changes, chemotaxis, secretion, and respiratory burst. FEBS Lett. 346, 181–184 (1994).
pubmed: 8013630
doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00463-3
Sadik, C. D. & Luster, A. D. Lipid-cytokine-chemokine cascades orchestrate leukocyte recruitment in inflammation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 91, 207–215 (2012).
pubmed: 22058421
pmcid: 3290425
doi: 10.1189/jlb.0811402
McDonald, B. & Kubes, P. Cellular and molecular choreography of neutrophil recruitment to sites of sterile inflammation. J. Mol. Med. 89, 1079–1088 (2011).
pubmed: 21751029
doi: 10.1007/s00109-011-0784-9
Junger, W. G. Immune cell regulation by autocrine purinergic signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 11, 201–212 (2011).
pubmed: 21331080
pmcid: 4209705
doi: 10.1038/nri2938
Yoo, S. K., Starnes, T. W., Deng, Q. & Huttenlocher, A. Lyn is a redox sensor that mediates leukocyte wound attraction in vivo. Nature 480, 109–112 (2011).
pubmed: 22101434
pmcid: 3228893
doi: 10.1038/nature10632
Katikaneni, A. et al. Lipid peroxidation regulates long-range wound detection through 5-lipoxygenase in zebrafish. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 1049–1055 (2020).
pubmed: 32868902
pmcid: 7898270
doi: 10.1038/s41556-020-0564-2
Blockus, H. & Chédotal, A. Slit-Robo signaling. Development 143, 3037–3044 (2016).
pubmed: 27578174
doi: 10.1242/dev.132829
Boyer, N. P. & Gupton, S. L. Revisiting netrin-1: one who guides (axons). Front. Cell Neurosci. 12, 221 (2018).
pubmed: 30108487
pmcid: 6080411
doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00221
Hu, S. & Zhu, L. Semaphorins and their receptors: from axonal guidance to atherosclerosis. Front. Physiol. 9, 1236 (2018).
pubmed: 30405423
pmcid: 6196129
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01236
Kania, A. & Klein, R. Mechanisms of ephrin-Eph signalling in development, physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 240–256 (2016).
pubmed: 26790531
doi: 10.1038/nrm.2015.16
Crick, F. Diffusion in embryogenesis. Nature 225, 420–422 (1970).
pubmed: 5411117
doi: 10.1038/225420a0
Majumdar, R., Sixt, M. & Parent, C. A. New paradigms in the establishment and maintenance of gradients during directed cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 30, 33–40 (2014).
pubmed: 24959970
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.05.010
Lau, S. et al. A negative-feedback loop maintains optimal chemokine concentrations for directional cell migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 266–273 (2020).
pubmed: 32042179
pmcid: 7809593
doi: 10.1038/s41556-020-0465-4
Stapornwongkul, K. S., de Gennes, M., Cocconi, L., Salbreux, G. & Vincent, J. P. Patterning and growth control in vivo by an engineered GFP gradient. Science 370, 321–327 (2020). Using a synthetic morphogen in D. melanogaster, the authors show that the expression of non-signalling decoy receptors improves the ability of receptors engineered to respond to the synthetic morphogen to organize patterning and growth in vivo.
pubmed: 33060356
pmcid: 7611032
doi: 10.1126/science.abb8205
Tweedy, L., Knecht, D. A., Mackay, G. M. & Insall, R. H. Self-generated chemoattractant gradients: attractant depletion extends the range and robustness of chemotaxis. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002404 (2016).
pubmed: 26981861
pmcid: 4794234
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002404
Muinonen-Martin, A. J. et al. Melanoma cells break down LPA to establish local gradients that drive chemotactic dispersal. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001966 (2014).
pubmed: 25313567
pmcid: 4196730
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001966
Juin, A. et al. N-WASP control of LPAR1 trafficking establishes response to self-generated LPA gradients to promote pancreatic cancer cell metastasis. Dev. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2019.09.018 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.09.018
pubmed: 31668663
pmcid: 6863394
Tweedy, L. et al. Seeing around corners: cells solve mazes and respond at a distance using attractant breakdown. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9792 (2020).
doi: 10.1126/science.aay9792
pubmed: 32855311
Pond, K. W., Doubrovinski, K. & Thorne, C. A. Wnt/β-catenin signaling in tissue self-organization. Genes (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11080939 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/genes11080939
Lu, P., Takai, K., Weaver, V. M. & Werb, Z. Extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling in development and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect Biol. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a005058 (2011).
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005058
pubmed: 21917992
pmcid: 3225943
Afonso, P. V., McCann, C. P., Kapnick, S. M. & Parent, C. A. Discoidin domain receptor 2 regulates neutrophil chemotaxis in 3D collagen matrices. Blood 121, 1644–1650 (2013).
pubmed: 23233663
pmcid: 3587327
doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-08-451575
Shields, J. D. et al. Autologous chemotaxis as a mechanism of tumor cell homing to lymphatics via interstitial flow and autocrine CCR7 signaling. Cancer Cell 11, 526–538 (2007).
pubmed: 17560334
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.04.020
Polacheck, W. J., Charest, J. L. & Kamm, R. D. Interstitial flow influences direction of tumor cell migration through competing mechanisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11115–11120 (2011).
pubmed: 21690404
pmcid: 3131352
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103581108
Müller, P., Rogers, K. W., Yu, S. R., Brand, M. & Schier, A. F. Morphogen transport. Development 140, 1621–1638 (2013).
pubmed: 23533171
pmcid: 3621481
doi: 10.1242/dev.083519
Restrepo, S., Zartman, J. J. & Basler, K. Coordination of patterning and growth by the morphogen DPP. Curr. Biol. 24, R245–R255 (2014).
pubmed: 24650915
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.055
Kriebel, P. W., Barr, V. A., Rericha, E. C., Zhang, G. & Parent, C. A. Collective cell migration requires vesicular trafficking for chemoattractant delivery at the trailing edge. J. Cell Biol. 183, 949–961 (2008).
pubmed: 19047467
pmcid: 2592838
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200808105
Kriebel, P. W. et al. Extracellular vesicles direct migration by synthesizing and releasing chemotactic signals. J. Cell Biol. 217, 2891–2910 (2018).
pubmed: 29884750
pmcid: 6080930
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201710170
Esser, J. et al. Exosomes from human macrophages and dendritic cells contain enzymes for leukotriene biosynthesis and promote granulocyte migration. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 126, 1032–1040 (2010).
pubmed: 20728205
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.06.039
Afonso, P. V. et al. LTB4 is a signal-relay molecule during neutrophil chemotaxis. Dev. Cell 22, 1079–1091 (2012).
pubmed: 22542839
pmcid: 4141281
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.02.003
Lämmermann, T. et al. Neutrophil swarms require LTB4 and integrins at sites of cell death in vivo. Nature 498, 371–375 (2013).
pubmed: 23708969
doi: 10.1038/nature12175
Brown, M. et al. Lymphatic exosomes promote dendritic cell migration along guidance cues. J. Cell. Biol. 217, 2205–2221 (2018).
pubmed: 29650776
pmcid: 5987709
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201612051
Chen, T., Guo, J., Yang, M., Zhu, X. & Cao, X. Chemokine-containing exosomes are released from heat-stressed tumor cells via lipid raft-dependent pathway and act as efficient tumor vaccine. J. Immunol. 186, 2219–2228 (2011).
pubmed: 21242526
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002991
Lim, K. et al. Neutrophil trails guide influenza-specific CD8
pubmed: 26339033
pmcid: 4809646
doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4352
Sung, B. H., Ketova, T., Hoshino, D., Zijlstra, A. & Weaver, A. M. Directional cell movement through tissues is controlled by exosome secretion. Nat. Commun. 6, 7164 (2015).
pubmed: 25968605
doi: 10.1038/ncomms8164
Sung, B. H. & Weaver, A. M. Exosome secretion promotes chemotaxis of cancer cells. Cell Adh. Migr. 11, 187–195 (2017).
pubmed: 28129015
pmcid: 5351719
doi: 10.1080/19336918.2016.1273307
Hynes, R. O. Stretching the boundaries of extracellular matrix research. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 761–763 (2014).
pubmed: 25574535
doi: 10.1038/nrm3908
Charras, G. & Sahai, E. Physical influences of the extracellular environment on cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 813–824 (2014).
pubmed: 25355506
doi: 10.1038/nrm3897
Mouw, J. K., Ou, G. & Weaver, V. M. Extracellular matrix assembly: a multiscale deconstruction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 771–785 (2014).
pubmed: 25370693
pmcid: 4682873
doi: 10.1038/nrm3902
Bonnans, C., Chou, J. & Werb, Z. Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 786–801 (2014).
pubmed: 25415508
pmcid: 4316204
doi: 10.1038/nrm3904
Albacete-Albacete, L. et al. ECM deposition is driven by caveolin-1-dependent regulation of exosomal biogenesis and cargo sorting. J. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202006178 (2020).
doi: 10.1083/jcb.202006178
pubmed: 33053168
pmcid: 7551399
Zimmerman, S. P., Asokan, S. B., Kuhlman, B. & Bear, J. E. Cells lay their own tracks - optogenetic Cdc42 activation stimulates fibronectin deposition supporting directed migration. J. Cell Sci. 130, 2971–2983 (2017).
pubmed: 28754687
pmcid: 5612177
Singh, P., Carraher, C. & Schwarzbauer, J. E. Assembly of fibronectin extracellular matrix. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 26, 397–419 (2010).
pubmed: 20690820
pmcid: 3628685
doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104020
Miller, C. G., Budoff, G., Prenner, J. L. & Schwarzbauer, J. E. Minireview: fibronectin in retinal disease. Exp. Biol. Med. 242, 1–7 (2017).
doi: 10.1177/1535370216675245
Schultz, G. S. & Wysocki, A. Interactions between extracellular matrix and growth factors in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 17, 153–162 (2009).
pubmed: 19320882
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00466.x
Li, Q., Park, P. W., Wilson, C. L. & Parks, W. C. Matrilysin shedding of syndecan-1 regulates chemokine mobilization and transepithelial efflux of neutrophils in acute lung injury. Cell 111, 635–646 (2002).
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01079-6
Schumann, K. et al. Immobilized chemokine fields and soluble chemokine gradients cooperatively shape migration patterns of dendritic cells. Immunity 32, 703–713 (2010).
pubmed: 20471289
doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.04.017
Zhu, M. et al. Spatial mapping of tissue properties in vivo reveals a 3D stiffness gradient in the mouse limb bud. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 4781–4791 (2020). This is a technical tour de force demonstrating the existence of stiffness gradients in mouse embryos.
pubmed: 32071242
pmcid: 7060671
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912656117
Tran, V. D. & Kumar, S. Transduction of cell and matrix geometric cues by the actin cytoskeleton. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 68, 64–71 (2020).
pubmed: 33075689
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2020.08.016
Cai, L., Xiong, X., Kong, X. & Xie, J. The role of the lysyl oxidases in tissue repair and remodeling: a concise review. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 14, 15–30 (2017).
pubmed: 30603458
pmcid: 6171574
doi: 10.1007/s13770-016-0007-0
Handorf, A. M., Zhou, Y., Halanski, M. A. & Li, W. J. Tissue stiffness dictates development, homeostasis, and disease progression. Organogenesis 11, 1–15 (2015).
pubmed: 25915734
pmcid: 4594591
doi: 10.1080/15476278.2015.1019687
Ye, M. et al. Evolving roles of lysyl oxidase family in tumorigenesis and cancer therapy. Pharmacol. Ther. 215, 107633 (2020).
pubmed: 32693113
doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107633
Alcudia, J. F. et al. Lysyl oxidase and endothelial dysfunction: mechanisms of lysyl oxidase down-regulation by pro-inflammatory cytokines. Front. Biosci. 13, 2721–2727 (2008).
pubmed: 17981747
doi: 10.2741/2879
Chen, Y., Peng, W., Raffetto, J. D. & Khalil, R. A. Matrix metalloproteinases in remodeling of lower extremity veins and chronic venous disease. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl Sci. 147, 267–299 (2017).
pubmed: 28413031
pmcid: 5411014
doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.02.003
Quintero-Fabián, S. et al. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in angiogenesis and cancer. Front. Oncol. 9, 1370 (2019).
pubmed: 31921634
pmcid: 6915110
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01370
Kaverina, I., Krylyshkina, O. & Small, J. V. Microtubule targeting of substrate contacts promotes their relaxation and dissociation. J. Cell. Biol. 146, 1033–1044 (1999).
pubmed: 10477757
pmcid: 2169483
doi: 10.1083/jcb.146.5.1033
Paul, C. D., Mistriotis, P. & Konstantopoulos, K. Cancer cell motility: lessons from migration in confined spaces. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 131–140 (2017).
pubmed: 27909339
doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.123
Wolf, K., Müller, R., Borgmann, S., Bröcker, E. B. & Friedl, P. Amoeboid shape change and contact guidance: T-lymphocyte crawling through fibrillar collagen is independent of matrix remodeling by MMPs and other proteases. Blood 102, 3262–3269 (2003).
pubmed: 12855577
doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-12-3791
Renkawitz, J. et al. Nuclear positioning facilitates amoeboid migration along the path of least resistance. Nature 568, 546–550 (2019). This seminal article shows that leukocytes position the nucleus frontwards to gauge the available space and choose their path.
pubmed: 30944468
pmcid: 7217284
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1087-5
Castro-Castro, A. et al. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of MT1-MMP-dependent cancer cell invasion. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 32, 555–576 (2016).
pubmed: 27501444
doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125227
Wyckoff, J. B., Pinner, S. E., Gschmeissner, S., Condeelis, J. S. & Sahai, E. ROCK- and myosin-dependent matrix deformation enables protease-independent tumor-cell invasion in vivo. Curr. Biol. 16, 1515–1523 (2006).
pubmed: 16890527
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.065
Fisher, K. E. et al. MT1-MMP- and Cdc42-dependent signaling co-regulate cell invasion and tunnel formation in 3D collagen matrices. J. Cell Sci. 122, 4558–4569 (2009).
pubmed: 19934222
pmcid: 2787465
doi: 10.1242/jcs.050724
Weigelin, B., Bakker, G. J. & Friedl, P. Intravital third harmonic generation microscopy of collective melanoma cell invasion: Principles of interface guidance and microvesicle dynamics. Intravital 1, 32–43 (2012).
pubmed: 29607252
doi: 10.4161/intv.21223
Du Bois-Reymond, E. H. Vorläufiger Abriss einer Untersuchung über den sogenannten Froschstrom und über die elektromotorischen Fische. Ann. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.18431340102 (1843).
doi: 10.1002/andp.18431340102
Zhao, M. et al. Electrical signals control wound healing through phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase-gamma and PTEN. Nature 442, 457–460 (2006).
pubmed: 16871217
doi: 10.1038/nature04925
Hotary, K. B. & Robinson, K. R. Endogenous electrical currents and voltage gradients in Xenopus embryos and the consequences of their disruption. Dev. Biol. 166, 789–800 (1994).
pubmed: 7813796
doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1357
Klein, P. S. et al. A chemoattractant receptor controls development in Dictyostelium discoideum. Science 241, 1467–1472 (1988).
pubmed: 3047871
doi: 10.1126/science.3047871
Murphy, P. M. & Tiffany, H. L. Cloning of complementary DNA encoding a functional human interleukin-8 receptor. Science 253, 1280–1283 (1991).
pubmed: 1891716
doi: 10.1126/science.1891716
Holmes, W. E., Lee, J., Kuang, W. J., Rice, G. C. & Wood, W. I. Structure and functional expression of a human interleukin-8 receptor. Science 253, 1278–1280 (1991).
pubmed: 1840701
doi: 10.1126/science.1840701
Griffith, J. W., Sokol, C. L. & Luster, A. D. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: positioning cells for host defense and immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 32, 659–702 (2014).
pubmed: 24655300
doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120145
Hughes, C. E. & Nibbs, R. J. B. A guide to chemokines and their receptors. FEBS J. 285, 2944–2971 (2018).
pubmed: 29637711
pmcid: 6120486
doi: 10.1111/febs.14466
Zlotnik, A. & Yoshie, O. Chemokines: a new classification system and their role in immunity. Immunity 12, 121–127 (2000).
doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80165-X
Sallusto, F. & Baggiolini, M. Chemokines and leukocyte traffic. Nat. Immunol. 9, 949–952 (2008).
pubmed: 18711431
doi: 10.1038/ni.f.214
Locati, M. & Murphy, P. M. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: biology and clinical relevance in inflammation and AIDS. Annu. Rev. Med. 50, 425–440 (1999).
pubmed: 10073287
doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.50.1.425
Proudfoot, A. E. Chemokine receptors: multifaceted therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2, 106–115 (2002).
pubmed: 11910892
pmcid: 7097668
doi: 10.1038/nri722
He, H. Q. & Ye, R. D. The formyl peptide receptors: diversity of ligands and mechanism for recognition. Molecules https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22030455 (2017).
doi: 10.3390/molecules22030455
pubmed: 29286347
pmcid: 6017195
Yokomizo, T. Two distinct leukotriene B4 receptors, BLT1 and BLT2. J. Biochem. 157, 65–71 (2015).
pubmed: 25480980
doi: 10.1093/jb/mvu078
Sadik, C. D., Kim, N. D. & Luster, A. D. Neutrophils cascading their way to inflammation. Trends Immunol. 32, 452–460 (2011).
pubmed: 21839682
pmcid: 3470857
doi: 10.1016/j.it.2011.06.008
Anand-Apte, B. & Zetter, B. Signaling mechanisms in growth factor-stimulated cell motility. Stem Cells 15, 259–267 (1997).
pubmed: 9253109
doi: 10.1002/stem.150259
Vorotnikov, A. V. & Tyurin-Kuzmin, P. A. Chemotactic signaling in mesenchymal cells compared to amoeboid cells. Genes Dis. 1, 162–173 (2014).
pubmed: 30258862
pmcid: 6150068
doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2014.09.006
Bear, J. E. & Haugh, J. M. Directed migration of mesenchymal cells: where signaling and the cytoskeleton meet. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 30, 74–82 (2014).
pubmed: 24999834
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.06.005
Gorla, M. & Bashaw, G. J. Molecular mechanisms regulating axon responsiveness at the midline. Dev. Biol. 466, 12–21 (2020).
pubmed: 32818516
doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2020.08.006
Bellon, A. & Mann, F. Keeping up with advances in axon guidance. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 53, 183–191 (2018).
pubmed: 30273799
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2018.09.004
Tessier-Lavigne, M. & Goodman, C. S. The molecular biology of axon guidance. Science 274, 1123–1133 (1996).
pubmed: 8895455
doi: 10.1126/science.274.5290.1123
Mirakaj, V. & Rosenberger, P. Immunomodulatory functions of neuronal guidance proteins. Trends Immunol. 38, 444–456 (2017).
pubmed: 28438491
doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.03.007
Wu, J. Y. et al. The neuronal repellent Slit inhibits leukocyte chemotaxis induced by chemotactic factors. Nature 410, 948–952 (2001).
pubmed: 11309622
pmcid: 2072862
doi: 10.1038/35073616
Tole, S. et al. The axonal repellent, Slit2, inhibits directional migration of circulating neutrophils. J. Leukoc. Biol. 86, 1403–1415 (2009).
pubmed: 19759280
doi: 10.1189/jlb.0609391
Pilling, D., Chinea, L. E., Consalvo, K. M. & Gomer, R. H. Different isoforms of the neuronal guidance molecule Slit2 directly cause chemoattraction or chemorepulsion of human neutrophils. J. Immunol. 202, 239–248 (2019).
pubmed: 30510066
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800681
Huttenlocher, A. & Horwitz, A. R. Integrins in cell migration. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect Biol. 3, a005074 (2011).
pubmed: 21885598
pmcid: 3181029
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005074
Henning Stumpf, B., Ambriovic´-Ristov, A., Radenovic, A. & Smith, A. S. Recent advances and prospects in the research of nascent adhesions. Front. Physiol. 11, 574371 (2020).
pubmed: 33343382
pmcid: 7746844
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.574371
Schwarz, J. et al. Dendritic cells interpret haptotactic chemokine gradients in a manner governed by signal-to-noise ratio and dependent on GRK6. Curr Biol 27, 1314–1325 (2017). This study shows differential regulation of the same chemokine receptor in the context of a chemotactic and haptotactic cue.
pubmed: 28457871
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.004
Shellard, A. & Mayor, R. Durotaxis: the hard path from in vitro to in vivo. Dev. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2020.11.019 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.11.019
pubmed: 33290722
Sunyer, R. & Trepat, X. Durotaxis. Curr. Biol. 30, R383–r387 (2020).
pubmed: 32369745
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.051
Janmey, P. A., Fletcher, D. A. & Reinhart-King, C. A. Stiffness sensing by cells. Physiol. Rev. 100, 695–724 (2020).
pubmed: 31751165
doi: 10.1152/physrev.00013.2019
Astrof, N. S., Salas, A., Shimaoka, M., Chen, J. & Springer, T. A. Importance of force linkage in mechanochemistry of adhesion receptors. Biochemistry 45, 15020–15028 (2006).
pubmed: 17154539
doi: 10.1021/bi061566o
Jiang, G., Huang, A. H., Cai, Y., Tanase, M. & Sheetz, M. P. Rigidity sensing at the leading edge through alphavbeta3 integrins and RPTPalpha. Biophys. J. 90, 1804–1809 (2006).
pubmed: 16339875
doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.072462
Nordenfelt, P. et al. Direction of actin flow dictates integrin LFA-1 orientation during leukocyte migration. Nat. Commun. 8, 2047 (2017).
pubmed: 29229906
pmcid: 5725580
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01848-y
Moore, T. I., Aaron, J., Chew, T. L. & Springer, T. A. Measuring integrin conformational change on the cell surface with super-resolution microscopy. Cell Rep. 22, 1903–1912 (2018).
pubmed: 29444440
pmcid: 5851489
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.062
Lämmermann, T. et al. Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing. Nature 453, 51–55 (2008).
pubmed: 18451854
doi: 10.1038/nature06887
Hetmanski, J. H. R. et al. Membrane tension orchestrates rear retraction in matrix-directed cell migration. Dev. Cell 51, 460–475.e410 (2019). This recent study shows the importance of membrane tension in directed migration.
pubmed: 31607653
pmcid: 6863396
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.09.006
Sitarska, E. & Diz-Muñoz, A. Pay attention to membrane tension: mechanobiology of the cell surface. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 66, 11–18 (2020).
pubmed: 32416466
pmcid: 7594640
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2020.04.001
Baschieri, F. et al. Frustrated endocytosis controls contractility-independent mechanotransduction at clathrin-coated structures. Nat. Commun. 9, 3825 (2018).
pubmed: 30237420
pmcid: 6148028
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06367-y
Douguet, D. & Honoré, E. Mammalian mechanoelectrical transduction: structure and function of force-gated ion channels. Cell 179, 340–354 (2019).
pubmed: 31585078
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.049
Goult, B. T., Yan, J. & Schwartz, M. A. Talin as a mechanosensitive signaling hub. J. Cell Biol. 217, 3776–3784 (2018).
pubmed: 30254032
pmcid: 6219721
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201808061
Grashoff, C. et al. Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics. Nature 466, 263–266 (2010). This seminal article establishes a tension-based Förster resonance energy transfer biosensor using the focal adhesion protein vinculin.
pubmed: 20613844
pmcid: 2901888
doi: 10.1038/nature09198
Sawada, Y. et al. Force sensing by mechanical extension of the Src family kinase substrate p130Cas. Cell 127, 1015–1026 (2006).
pubmed: 17129785
pmcid: 2746973
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.044
MacKay, J. L. & Hammer, D. A. Stiff substrates enhance monocytic cell capture through E-selectin but not P-selectin. Integr. Biol. 8, 62–72 (2016).
doi: 10.1039/C5IB00199D
Sun, X. et al. Mechanosensing through direct binding of tensed F-Actin by LIM domains. Dev. Cell 55, 468–482.e467 (2020).
pubmed: 33058779
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.09.022
Winkelman, J. D., Anderson, C. A., Suarez, C., Kovar, D. R. & Gardel, M. L. Evolutionarily diverse LIM domain-containing proteins bind stressed actin filaments through a conserved mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 25532–25542 (2020). This article, along with Sun et al. (2020), shows that LIM domain-containing proteins bind differentially to actin filaments based on filament tension.
pubmed: 32989126
pmcid: 7568268
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004656117
Rong, Y. et al. The Golgi microtubules regulate single cell durotaxis. EMBO Rep. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202051094 (2021).
doi: 10.15252/embr.202051094
pubmed: 33559938
Guilluy, C. et al. Isolated nuclei adapt to force and reveal a mechanotransduction pathway in the nucleus. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 376–381 (2014).
pubmed: 24609268
pmcid: 4085695
doi: 10.1038/ncb2927
Arsenovic, P. T. et al. Nesprin-2G, a component of the nuclear LINC complex, is subject to myosin-dependent tension. Biophys. J. 110, 34–43 (2016).
pubmed: 26745407
pmcid: 4805861
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.014
Gomes, E. R., Jani, S. & Gundersen, G. G. Nuclear movement regulated by Cdc42, MRCK, myosin, and actin flow establishes MTOC polarization in migrating cells. Cell 121, 451–463 (2005).
pubmed: 15882626
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.022
Petrie, R. J., Koo, H. & Yamada, K. M. Generation of compartmentalized pressure by a nuclear piston governs cell motility in a 3D matrix. Science 345, 1062–1065 (2014).
pubmed: 25170155
pmcid: 5248932
doi: 10.1126/science.1256965
Lou, H. Y., Zhao, W., Zeng, Y. & Cui, B. The role of membrane curvature in nanoscale topography-induced intracellular signaling. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 1046–1053 (2018).
pubmed: 29648779
pmcid: 7384307
doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00594
Driscoll, M. K., Sun, X., Guven, C., Fourkas, J. T. & Losert, W. Cellular contact guidance through dynamic sensing of nanotopography. ACS Nano 8, 3546–3555 (2014).
pubmed: 24649900
pmcid: 4017610
doi: 10.1021/nn406637c
Chen, S. et al. Actin cytoskeleton and focal adhesions regulate the biased migration of breast cancer cells on nanoscale asymmetric sawteeth. ACS Nano 13, 1454–1468 (2019). This article shows that breast cancer cell lines exhibit different migration phenotypes on asymmetric sawtooth nanopatterns through the distinct regulation of actin polymerization waves and focal adhesion dynamics.
pubmed: 30707556
pmcid: 7159974
Le Maout, E., Lo Vecchio, S., Kumar Korla, P., Jinn-Chyuan Sheu, J. & Riveline, D. Ratchetaxis in channels: entry point and local asymmetry set cell directions in confinement. Biophys. J. 119, 1301–1308 (2020). This article shows how cell direction through 3D ratchet channels is dictated by spatial asymmetry in two-sided confined channels and the entry point of the all-sided confined channels.
pubmed: 33027610
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.08.028
Ramirez-San Juan, G. R., Oakes, P. W. & Gardel, M. L. Contact guidance requires spatial control of leading-edge protrusion. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 1043–1053 (2017).
pubmed: 28228548
pmcid: 5391181
doi: 10.1091/mbc.e16-11-0769
Jang, K. J. et al. Two distinct filopodia populations at the growth cone allow to sense nanotopographical extracellular matrix cues to guide neurite outgrowth. PLoS ONE 5, e15966 (2010).
pubmed: 21209862
pmcid: 3012734
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015966
Kubow, K. E., Shuklis, V. D., Sales, D. J. & Horwitz, A. R. Contact guidance persists under myosin inhibition due to the local alignment of adhesions and individual protrusions. Sci. Rep. 7, 14380 (2017). This is a key article showing that cells can sense the topology of aligned fibres even in the absence of myosin activity.
pubmed: 29085052
pmcid: 5662575
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14745-7
Lou, H. Y. et al. Membrane curvature underlies actin reorganization in response to nanoscale surface topography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23143–23151 (2019). This is an important article identifying membrane curvature-sensing BAR-family protein FBP17 as the bridge between surface topology and topology-induced reorganization of the actin network.
pubmed: 31591250
pmcid: 6859365
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910166116
McGregor, A. L., Hsia, C. R. & Lammerding, J. Squish and squeeze-the nucleus as a physical barrier during migration in confined environments. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 40, 32–40 (2016).
pubmed: 26895141
pmcid: 4887392
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.01.011
Lomakin, A. J. et al. The nucleus acts as a ruler tailoring cell responses to spatial constraints. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba2894 (2020).
doi: 10.1126/science.aba2894
pubmed: 33060332
pmcid: 8059074
Venturini, V. et al. The nucleus measures shape changes for cellular proprioception to control dynamic cell behavior. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba2644 (2020). This article, along with Lomakin et al. (2020), shows that cells interpret cell shape and control movement in confined spaces by gauging nuclear deformation and initiating signalling events at the nucleus.
doi: 10.1126/science.aba2644
pubmed: 33060331
Zhao, M. Electrical fields in wound healing — an overriding signal that directs cell migration. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 674–682 (2009).
pubmed: 19146969
doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.12.009
Allen, G. M., Mogilner, A. & Theriot, J. A. Electrophoresis of cellular membrane components creates the directional cue guiding keratocyte galvanotaxis. Curr. Biol. 23, 560–568 (2013). This is a key article establishing the mechanism of galvanotaxis.
pubmed: 23541731
pmcid: 3718648
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.047
Sarkar, A., Kobylkevich, B. M., Graham, D. M. & Messerli, M. A. Electromigration of cell surface macromolecules in DC electric fields during cell polarization and galvanotaxis. J. Theor. Biol. 478, 58–73 (2019).
pubmed: 31211960
doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.06.015
Lin, B. J. et al. Lipid rafts sense and direct electric field-induced migration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 8568–8573 (2017).
pubmed: 28739955
pmcid: 5559012
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702526114
Li, X., Miao, Y., Pal, D. S. & Devreotes, P. N. Excitable networks controlling cell migration during development and disease. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 100, 133–142 (2020).
pubmed: 31836289
doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.11.001
Xiao, Z., Zhang, N., Murphy, D. B. & Devreotes, P. N. Dynamic distribution of chemoattractant receptors in living cells during chemotaxis and persistent stimulation. J. Cell Biol. 139, 365–374 (1997).
pubmed: 9334341
pmcid: 2139806
doi: 10.1083/jcb.139.2.365
Servant, G., Weiner, O. D., Neptune, E. R., Sedat, J. W. & Bourne, H. R. Dynamics of a chemoattractant receptor in living neutrophils during chemotaxis. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 1163–1178 (1999).
pubmed: 10198064
pmcid: 25243
doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.4.1163
Nieto, M. et al. Polarization of chemokine receptors to the leading edge during lymphocyte chemotaxis. J. Exp. Med. 186, 153–158 (1997).
pubmed: 9207004
pmcid: 2198956
doi: 10.1084/jem.186.1.153
Bailly, M. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor distribution during chemotactic responses. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 3873–3883 (2000).
pubmed: 11071913
pmcid: 15043
doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.11.3873
Bergeron, J. J., Di Guglielmo, G. M., Dahan, S., Dominguez, M. & Posner, B. I. Spatial and temporal regulation of receptor tyrosine kinase activation and intracellular signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 85, 573–597 (2016).
pubmed: 27023845
doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014659
Callan-Jones, A. C. & Voituriez, R. Actin flows in cell migration: from locomotion and polarity to trajectories. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 38, 12–17 (2016).
pubmed: 26827283
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.01.003
Parent, C. A., Blacklock, B. J., Froehlich, W. M., Murphy, D. B. & Devreotes, P. N. G protein signaling events are activated at the leading edge of chemotactic cells. Cell 95, 81–91 (1998).
pubmed: 9778249
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81784-5
Servant, G. et al. Polarization of chemoattractant receptor signaling during neutrophil chemotaxis. Science 287, 1037–1040 (2000).
pubmed: 10669415
pmcid: 2822871
doi: 10.1126/science.287.5455.1037
Haugh, J. M., Codazzi, F., Teruel, M. & Meyer, T. Spatial sensing in fibroblasts mediated by 3’ phosphoinositides. J. Cell Biol. 151, 1269–1280 (2000).
pubmed: 11121441
pmcid: 2190602
doi: 10.1083/jcb.151.6.1269
Artemenko, Y., Lampert, T. J. & Devreotes, P. N. Moving towards a paradigm: common mechanisms of chemotactic signaling in Dictyostelium and mammalian leukocytes. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 71, 3711–3747 (2014).
pubmed: 24846395
pmcid: 4162842
doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1638-8
Kunisaki, Y. et al. DOCK2 is a Rac activator that regulates motility and polarity during neutrophil chemotaxis. J. Cell Biol. 174, 647–652 (2006).
pubmed: 16943182
pmcid: 2064308
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200602142
Zhao, T. et al. Signaling requirements for translocation of P-Rex1, a key Rac2 exchange factor involved in chemoattractant-stimulated human neutrophil function. J. Leukoc. Biol. 81, 1127–1136 (2007).
pubmed: 17227822
doi: 10.1189/jlb.0406251
Yan, J. et al. A Gβγ effector, ElmoE, transduces GPCR signaling to the actin network during chemotaxis. Dev. Cell 22, 92–103 (2012).
pubmed: 22264729
pmcid: 6993146
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.11.007
Asokan, S. B. et al. Mesenchymal chemotaxis requires selective inactivation of myosin II at the leading edge via a noncanonical PLCgamma/PKCalpha pathway. Dev. Cell 31, 747–760 (2014).
pubmed: 25482883
pmcid: 4276478
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.10.024
Hoeller, O. & Kay, R. R. Chemotaxis in the absence of PIP3 gradients. CB 17, 813–817 (2007).
pubmed: 17462897
Liu, L., Das, S., Losert, W. & Parent, C. A. mTORC2 regulates neutrophil chemotaxis in a cAMP- and RhoA-dependent fashion. Dev. Cell 19, 845–857 (2010).
pubmed: 21145500
pmcid: 3071587
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.11.004
Chen, M. Y., Long, Y. & Devreotes, P. N. A novel cytosolic regulator, Pianissimo, is required for chemoattractant receptor and G protein-mediated activation of the 12 transmembrane domain adenylyl cyclase in Dictyostelium. Genes Dev. 11, 3218–3231 (1997).
pubmed: 9389653
pmcid: 316743
doi: 10.1101/gad.11.23.3218
Lee, S. et al. TOR complex 2 integrates cell movement during chemotaxis and signal relay in Dictyostelium. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 4572–4583 (2005).
pubmed: 16079174
pmcid: 1237065
doi: 10.1091/mbc.e05-04-0342
He, Y. et al. Mammalian target of rapamycin and Rictor control neutrophil chemotaxis by regulating Rac/Cdc42 activity and the actin cytoskeleton. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 3369–3380 (2013).
pubmed: 24006489
pmcid: 3814157
doi: 10.1091/mbc.e13-07-0405
Chen, L. et al. PLA2 and PI3K/PTEN pathways act in parallel to mediate chemotaxis. Dev. Cell 12, 603–614 (2007).
pubmed: 17419997
pmcid: 1986835
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.03.005
van Haastert, P. J., Keizer-Gunnink, I. & Kortholt, A. Essential role of PI3-kinase and phospholipase A
pubmed: 17535967
pmcid: 2064281
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200701134
Heit, B. et al. PTEN functions to ‘prioritize’ chemotactic cues and prevent ‘distraction’ in migrating neutrophils. Nat. Immunol. 9, 743–752 (2008).
pubmed: 18536720
doi: 10.1038/ni.1623
Meliton, A. Y. et al. Cytosolic group IVa phospholipase A
doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-7-14
Yonker, L. M. et al. Neutrophil-derived cytosolic PLA2α contributes to bacterial-induced neutrophil transepithelial migration. J. Immunol. 199, 2873–2884 (2017).
pubmed: 28887431
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700539
Ma, H., Gamper, M., Parent, C. & Firtel, R. A. The Dictyostelium MAP kinase kinase DdMEK1 regulates chemotaxis and is essential for chemoattractant-mediated activation of guanylyl cyclase. EMBO J. 16, 4317–4332 (1997).
pubmed: 9250676
pmcid: 1170058
doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.14.4317
Mendoza, M. C., Booth, E. O., Shaulsky, G. & Firtel, R. A. MEK1 and protein phosphatase 4 coordinate Dictyostelium development and chemotaxis. Mol. Cell Biol. 27, 3817–3827 (2007).
pubmed: 17353263
pmcid: 1899987
doi: 10.1128/MCB.02194-06
Heit, B., Tavener, S., Raharjo, E. & Kubes, P. An intracellular signaling hierarchy determines direction of migration in opposing chemotactic gradients. J. Cell Biol. 159, 91–102 (2002).
pubmed: 12370241
pmcid: 2173486
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200202114
Liu, X. et al. Bidirectional regulation of neutrophil migration by mitogen-activated protein kinases. Nat. Immunol. 13, 457–464 (2012).
pubmed: 22447027
pmcid: 3330201
doi: 10.1038/ni.2258
Mouneimne, G. et al. Spatial and temporal control of cofilin activity is required for directional sensing during chemotaxis. Curr. Biol. 16, 2193–2205 (2006).
pubmed: 17113383
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.016
Miao, Y. et al. Altering the threshold of an excitable signal transduction network changes cell migratory modes. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 329–340 (2017).
pubmed: 28346441
pmcid: 5394931
doi: 10.1038/ncb3495
Zhan, H. et al. An excitable Ras/PI3K/ERK signaling network controls migration and oncogenic transformation in epithelial cells. Dev. Cell 54, 608–623.e605 (2020).
pubmed: 32877650
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.08.001
King, S. J. et al. Lamellipodia are crucial for haptotactic sensing and response. J. Cell Sci. 129, 2329–2342 (2016).
pubmed: 27173494
pmcid: 4920251
Cox, C. D., Bavi, N. & Martinac, B. Biophysical principles of ion-channel-mediated mechanosensory transduction. Cell Rep. 29, 1–12 (2019).
pubmed: 31577940
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.075
Pal, N., Wu, M. & Lu, H. P. Probing conformational dynamics of an enzymatic active site by an in situ single fluorogenic probe under piconewton force manipulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 15006–15011 (2016).
pubmed: 27940917
pmcid: 5206548
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613404114
Hu, X., Margadant, F. M., Yao, M. & Sheetz, M. P. Molecular stretching modulates mechanosensing pathways. Protein Sci. 26, 1337–1351 (2017).
pubmed: 28474792
pmcid: 5477536
doi: 10.1002/pro.3188
Kumar, A. et al. Talin tension sensor reveals novel features of focal adhesion force transmission and mechanosensitivity. J. Cell Biol. 213, 371–383 (2016).
pubmed: 27161398
pmcid: 4862330
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201510012
Rothenberg, K. E., Scott, D. W., Christoforou, N. & Hoffman, B. D. Vinculin force-sensitive dynamics at focal adhesions enable effective directed cell migration. Biophys. J. 114, 1680–1694 (2018). This recent work using the vinculin Förster resonance energy transfer-based tension sensor shows precise regulation of tension at different focal adhesions during directed migration.
pubmed: 29642037
pmcid: 5954296
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.02.019
Ringer, P. et al. Multiplexing molecular tension sensors reveals piconewton force gradient across talin-1. Nat Methods 14, 1090–1096 (2017).
pubmed: 28945706
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4431
LaCroix, A. S., Lynch, A. D., Berginski, M. E. & Hoffman, B. D. Tunable molecular tension sensors reveal extension-based control of vinculin loading. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33927 (2018).
doi: 10.7554/eLife.33927
pubmed: 30024378
pmcid: 6053308
Huang, D. L., Bax, N. A., Buckley, C. D., Weis, W. I. & Dunn, A. R. Vinculin forms a directionally asymmetric catch bond with F-actin. Science 357, 703–706 (2017).
pubmed: 28818948
pmcid: 5821505
doi: 10.1126/science.aan2556
Owen, L. M., Bax, N. A., Weis, W. I. & Dunn, A. R. The C-terminal actin binding domain of talin forms an asymmetric catch bond with F-actin. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.01.276568 (2020).
doi: 10.1101/2020.09.01.276568
pubmed: 32935104
pmcid: 7239067
Singh, A. V. et al. Astrocytes increase ATP exocytosis mediated calcium signaling in response to microgroove structures. Sci. Rep. 5, 7847 (2015).
pubmed: 25597401
pmcid: 4297955
doi: 10.1038/srep07847
Hung, W. C. et al. Confinement sensing and signal optimization via Piezo1/PKA and myosin II pathways. Cell Rep. 15, 1430–1441 (2016).
pubmed: 27160899
pmcid: 5341576
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.035
Bavi, N., Richardson, J., Heu, C., Martinac, B. & Poole, K. PIEZO1-mediated currents are modulated by substrate mechanics. ACS Nano 13, 13545–13559 (2019). This article shows that the surface geometry, including roughness and stiffness, modulates PIEZO1 channel activation in response to the external mechanical force applied at cell–substrate interfaces.
pubmed: 31689081
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b07499
Subramanian, B. C. et al. The LTB4-BLT1 axis regulates actomyosin and β2-integrin dynamics during neutrophil extravasation. J. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201910215 (2020). This article reports a critical role for neutrophil-derived LTB
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201910215
pubmed: 32854115
pmcid: 7659729
Gao, R. et al. A large-scale screen reveals genes that mediate electrotaxis in Dictyostelium discoideum. Sci. Signal 8, ra50 (2015).
pubmed: 26012633
pmcid: 4470479
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aab0562
Sánchez, M. F., Els-Heindl, S., Beck-Sickinger, A. G., Wieneke, R. & Tampé, R. Photo-induced receptor confinement drives ligand-independent GPCR signaling. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb7657 (2021).
doi: 10.1126/science.abb7657
pubmed: 34140386
Smith, H. E. Nematode sperm motility. WormBook https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.68.2 (2014).
doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.68.2
pubmed: 24715710
pmcid: 5402208
Pollard, T. D. & Borisy, G. G. Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell 112, 453–465 (2003).
pubmed: 12600310
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00120-X
Bodor, D. L., Pönisch, W., Endres, R. G. & Paluch, E. K. Of cell shapes and motion: the physical basis of animal cell migration. Dev. Cell 52, 550–562 (2020).
pubmed: 32155438
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.02.013
Krause, M. & Gautreau, A. Steering cell migration: lamellipodium dynamics and the regulation of directional persistence. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 577–590 (2014).
pubmed: 25145849
doi: 10.1038/nrm3861
McCormick, L. E. & Gupton, S. L. Mechanistic advances in axon pathfinding. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 63, 11–19 (2020).
pubmed: 31927278
pmcid: 7247931
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.12.003
Johnson, H. E. et al. F-actin bundles direct the initiation and orientation of lamellipodia through adhesion-based signaling. J. Cell Biol. 208, 443–455 (2015).
pubmed: 25666809
pmcid: 4332254
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201406102
Svitkina, T. M. et al. Mechanism of filopodia initiation by reorganization of a dendritic network. J. Cell Biol. 160, 409–421 (2003).
pubmed: 12566431
pmcid: 2172658
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200210174
Wu, C. et al. Arp2/3 is critical for lamellipodia and response to extracellular matrix cues but is dispensable for chemotaxis. Cell 148, 973–987 (2012). This is the first article to establish that the Arp2/3 complex is required for ECM haptotaxis but is dispensable for RTK-dependent chemotaxis in fibroblasts.
pubmed: 22385962
pmcid: 3707508
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.034
Schaks, M., Giannone, G. & Rottner, K. Actin dynamics in cell migration. Essays Biochem. 63, 483–495 (2019).
pubmed: 31551324
pmcid: 6823167
doi: 10.1042/EBC20190015
Collins, S. R. et al. Using light to shape chemical gradients for parallel and automated analysis of chemotaxis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 804 (2015).
pubmed: 25908733
pmcid: 4422560
doi: 10.15252/msb.20156027
Davidson, A. J., Amato, C., Thomason, P. A. & Insall, R. H. WASP family proteins and formins compete in pseudopod- and bleb-based migration. J. Cell Biol. 217, 701–714 (2018).
pubmed: 29191847
pmcid: 5800805
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201705160
Vargas, P. et al. Innate control of actin nucleation determines two distinct migration behaviours in dendritic cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 43–53 (2016).
pubmed: 26641718
doi: 10.1038/ncb3284
Menon, S. et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIM9 is a filopodia off switch required for netrin-dependent axon guidance. Dev. Cell 35, 698–712 (2015).
pubmed: 26702829
pmcid: 4707677
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.11.022
Oakes, P. W. et al. Lamellipodium is a myosin-independent mechanosensor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2646–2651 (2018).
pubmed: 29487208
pmcid: 5856528
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715869115
Wong, S., Guo, W. H. & Wang, Y. L. Fibroblasts probe substrate rigidity with filopodia extensions before occupying an area. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17176–17181 (2014).
pubmed: 25404288
pmcid: 4260597
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412285111
Andrew, N. & Insall, R. H. Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of PtdIns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 193–200 (2007).
pubmed: 17220879
doi: 10.1038/ncb1536
Welf, E. S., Ahmed, S., Johnson, H. E., Melvin, A. T. & Haugh, J. M. Migrating fibroblasts reorient directionality by a metastable, PI3K-dependent mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 197, 105–114 (2012).
pubmed: 22472441
pmcid: 3317800
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201108152
Sun, X. et al. Asymmetric nanotopography biases cytoskeletal dynamics and promotes unidirectional cell guidance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12557–12562 (2015).
pubmed: 26417076
pmcid: 4611618
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502970112
Vicente-Manzanares, M., Ma, X., Adelstein, R. S. & Horwitz, A. R. Non-muscle myosin II takes centre stage in cell adhesion and migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 778–790 (2009).
pubmed: 19851336
pmcid: 2834236
doi: 10.1038/nrm2786
Plotnikov, S. V., Pasapera, A. M., Sabass, B. & Waterman, C. M. Force fluctuations within focal adhesions mediate ECM-rigidity sensing to guide directed cell migration. Cell 151, 1513–1527 (2012).
pubmed: 23260139
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.034
Chan, K. T., Bennin, D. A. & Huttenlocher, A. Regulation of adhesion dynamics by calpain-mediated proteolysis of focal adhesion kinase (FAK). J. Biol. Chem. 285, 11418–11426 (2010).
pubmed: 20150423
pmcid: 2857020
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.090746
Mayor, R. & Etienne-Manneville, S. The front and rear of collective cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 97–109 (2016).
pubmed: 26726037
doi: 10.1038/nrm.2015.14
Ladoux, B. & Mège, R. M. Mechanobiology of collective cell behaviours. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 743–757 (2017).
pubmed: 29115298
doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.98
Shellard, A., Szabó, A., Trepat, X. & Mayor, R. Supracellular contraction at the rear of neural crest cell groups drives collective chemotaxis. Science 362, 339–343 (2018). This article shows a rear wheel drive-like motility during collective chemotaxis by actomyosin contractility in a cluster of rear cells.
pubmed: 30337409
pmcid: 6218007
doi: 10.1126/science.aau3301
Yam, P. T. et al. Actin-myosin network reorganization breaks symmetry at the cell rear to spontaneously initiate polarized cell motility. J. Cell Biol. 178, 1207–1221 (2007).
pubmed: 17893245
pmcid: 2064654
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200706012
Tsai, T. Y. et al. Efficient front-rear coupling in neutrophil chemotaxis by dynamic myosin II localization. Dev. Cell 49, 189–205.e186 (2019). This article shows that the side-to-side redistribution of myosin II at the back of cells in response to leading-edge turning is critical for maintaining persistence and turning ability in neutrophils undergoing chemotaxis.
pubmed: 31014479
pmcid: 6708378
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.03.025
Allen, G. M. et al. Cell mechanics at the rear act to steer the direction of cell migration. Cell Syst. 11, 286–299.e284 (2020).
pubmed: 32916096
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2020.08.008
Charras, G. & Paluch, E. Blebs lead the way: how to migrate without lamellipodia. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 730–736 (2008).
pubmed: 18628785
doi: 10.1038/nrm2453
Zatulovskiy, E., Tyson, R., Bretschneider, T. & Kay, R. R. Bleb-driven chemotaxis of Dictyostelium cells. J. Cell Biol. 204, 1027–1044 (2014).
pubmed: 24616222
pmcid: 3998804
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201306147
Reversat, A. et al. Cellular locomotion using environmental topography. Nature 582, 582–585 (2020). This article identifies friction force generated by retrograde flow of actin propelling cells forward through a 3D environment in the absence of integrin engagement.
pubmed: 32581372
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2283-z
Aoun, L. et al. Amoeboid swimming is propelled by molecular paddling in lymphocytes. Biophys. J. 119, 1157–1177 (2020). This fascinating recent work demonstrates a new mechanism of cell swimming using ‘molecular paddling’ of cell surface proteins coupled to flow of the underlying cell cortex.
pubmed: 32882187
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.07.033
Purcell, E. M. Life at low Reynolds number. Am. J. Phys. 45, 3–11 (1977).
doi: 10.1119/1.10903
Yamada, K. M. & Sixt, M. Mechanisms of 3D cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 738–752 (2019).
pubmed: 31582855
doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0172-9
Dai, W. et al. Tissue topography steers migrating Drosophila border cells. Science 370, 987–990 (2020). This article shows that while chemical cues promote posterior movement, topographical cues provide orthogonal information and a path of least resistance during the migration of border cells in the egg chamber of D. melanogaster embryos.
pubmed: 33214282
doi: 10.1126/science.aaz4741
Mathias, J. R. et al. Resolution of inflammation by retrograde chemotaxis of neutrophils in transgenic zebrafish. J. Leukoc. Biol. 80, 1281–1288 (2006).
pubmed: 16963624
doi: 10.1189/jlb.0506346
Wang, J. et al. Visualizing the function and fate of neutrophils in sterile injury and repair. Science 358, 111–116 (2017).
pubmed: 28983053
doi: 10.1126/science.aam9690
Hind, L. E. & Huttenlocher, A. Neutrophil reverse migration and a chemokinetic resolution. Dev. Cell 47, 404–405 (2018).
pubmed: 30458135
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.11.004
Paluch, E. K., Aspalter, I. M. & Sixt, M. Focal adhesion-independent cell migration. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 32, 469–490 (2016).
pubmed: 27501447
doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125341
Shellard, A. & Mayor, R. All roads lead to directional cell migration. Trends Cell Biol. 30, 852–868 (2020).
pubmed: 32873438
doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.08.002
Haeger, A., Wolf, K., Zegers, M. M. & Friedl, P. Collective cell migration: guidance principles and hierarchies. Trends Cell Biol. 25, 556–566 (2015).
pubmed: 26137890
doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.06.003
Lämmermann, T. & Sixt, M. Mechanical modes of ‘amoeboid’ cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 636–644 (2009).
pubmed: 19523798
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.05.003
Pagès, D.-L. et al. Cell clusters adopt a collective amoeboid mode of migration in confined non-adhesive environments. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.28.106203 (2020).
doi: 10.1101/2020.05.28.106203
Liu, Y. J. et al. Confinement and low adhesion induce fast amoeboid migration of slow mesenchymal cells. Cell 160, 659–672 (2015).
pubmed: 25679760
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.007
Ruprecht, V. et al. Cortical contractility triggers a stochastic switch to fast amoeboid cell motility. Cell 160, 673–685 (2015).
pubmed: 25679761
pmcid: 4328143
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.008
Graziano, B. R. et al. Cell confinement reveals a branched-actin independent circuit for neutrophil polarity. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000457 (2019).
pubmed: 31600188
pmcid: 6805013
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000457
Lehmann, S. et al. Hypoxia induces a HIF-1-dependent transition from collective-to-amoeboid dissemination in epithelial cancer cells. Curr. Biol. 27, 392–400 (2017).
pubmed: 28089517
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.057