The principles of directed cell migration.


Journal

Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology
ISSN: 1471-0080
Titre abrégé: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100962782

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2021
Historique:
accepted: 30 03 2021
pubmed: 16 5 2021
medline: 29 9 2021
entrez: 15 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cells have the ability to respond to various types of environmental cues, and in many cases these cues induce directed cell migration towards or away from these signals. How cells sense these cues and how they transmit that information to the cytoskeletal machinery governing cell translocation is one of the oldest and most challenging problems in biology. Chemotaxis, or migration towards diffusible chemical cues, has been studied for more than a century, but information is just now beginning to emerge about how cells respond to other cues, such as substrate-associated cues during haptotaxis (chemical cues on the surface), durotaxis (mechanical substrate compliance) and topotaxis (geometric features of substrate). Here we propose four common principles, or pillars, that underlie all forms of directed migration. First, a signal must be generated, a process that in physiological environments is much more nuanced than early studies suggested. Second, the signal must be sensed, sometimes by cell surface receptors, but also in ways that are not entirely clear, such as in the case of mechanical cues. Third, the signal has to be transmitted from the sensing modules to the machinery that executes the actual movement, a step that often requires amplification. Fourth, the signal has to be converted into the application of asymmetric force relative to the substrate, which involves mostly the cytoskeleton, but perhaps other players as well. Use of these four pillars has allowed us to compare some of the similarities between different types of directed migration, but also to highlight the remarkable diversity in the mechanisms that cells use to respond to different cues provided by their environment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33990789
doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00366-6
pii: 10.1038/s41580-021-00366-6
pmc: PMC8663916
mid: NIHMS1761291
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

529-547

Subventions

Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI152517
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM130312
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : U01 EB018816
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2021. Springer Nature Limited.

Références

Borrell, V. Recent advances in understanding neocortical development. F1000Res https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20332.1 (2019).
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.20332.1 pubmed: 31681469 pmcid: 6816450
Pawar, K. B., Desai, S., Bhonde, R. R., Bhole, R. P. & Deshmukh, A. A. Wound with diabetes: present scenario and future. Curr. Diabetes Rev. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573399816666200703180137 (2020).
doi: 10.2174/1573399816666200703180137
Janssen, E. & Geha, R. S. Primary immunodeficiencies caused by mutations in actin regulatory proteins. Immunol. Rev. 287, 121–134 (2019).
pubmed: 30565251 doi: 10.1111/imr.12716
Novikov, N. M., Zolotaryova, S. Y., Gautreau, A. M. & Denisov, E. V. Mutational drivers of cancer cell migration and invasion. Br. J. Cancer https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-01149-0 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01149-0 pubmed: 33204027
García-Cuesta, E. M. et al. The role of the CXCL12/CXCR4/ACKR3 axis in autoimmune diseases. Front. Endocrinol. 10, 585 (2019).
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00585
Glass, D. S. et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: molecular mechanisms and potential treatment approaches. Respir Investig. 58, 320–335 (2020).
pubmed: 32487481 doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2020.04.002
Abercrombie, M. The Croonian Lecture, 1978 - the crawling movement of metazoan cells. Proc. Royal Soc. B Biol. Sci. 207, 129–147 (1980).
Abercrombie, M., Dunn, G. A. & Heath, J. P. The shape and movement of fibroblasts in culture. Soc. Gen. Physiol. Ser. 32, 57–70 (1977).
pubmed: 333596
Sardelli, L. et al. Engineering biological gradients. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 17, 2280800019829023 (2019).
pubmed: 30803308
Buttenschön, A. & Edelstein-Keshet, L. Bridging from single to collective cell migration: a review of models and links to experiments. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008411 (2020).
pubmed: 33301528 pmcid: 7728230 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008411
Wilkinson, P. C. Random locomotion; chemotaxis and chemokinesis. a guide to terms defining cell locomotion. Immunol. Today 6, 273–278 (1985).
pubmed: 25290568 doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(85)90066-0
Petrie, R. J., Doyle, A. D. & Yamada, K. M. Random versus directionally persistent cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 538–549 (2009).
pubmed: 19603038 pmcid: 2752299 doi: 10.1038/nrm2729
Dorward, D. A. et al. The role of formylated peptides and formyl peptide receptor 1 in governing neutrophil function during acute inflammation. Am. J. Pathol. 185, 1172–1184 (2015).
pubmed: 25791526 pmcid: 4419282 doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.01.020
Ehrengruber, M. U., Geiser, T. & Deranleau, D. A. Activation of human neutrophils by C3a and C5A. Comparison of the effects on shape changes, chemotaxis, secretion, and respiratory burst. FEBS Lett. 346, 181–184 (1994).
pubmed: 8013630 doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00463-3
Sadik, C. D. & Luster, A. D. Lipid-cytokine-chemokine cascades orchestrate leukocyte recruitment in inflammation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 91, 207–215 (2012).
pubmed: 22058421 pmcid: 3290425 doi: 10.1189/jlb.0811402
McDonald, B. & Kubes, P. Cellular and molecular choreography of neutrophil recruitment to sites of sterile inflammation. J. Mol. Med. 89, 1079–1088 (2011).
pubmed: 21751029 doi: 10.1007/s00109-011-0784-9
Junger, W. G. Immune cell regulation by autocrine purinergic signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 11, 201–212 (2011).
pubmed: 21331080 pmcid: 4209705 doi: 10.1038/nri2938
Yoo, S. K., Starnes, T. W., Deng, Q. & Huttenlocher, A. Lyn is a redox sensor that mediates leukocyte wound attraction in vivo. Nature 480, 109–112 (2011).
pubmed: 22101434 pmcid: 3228893 doi: 10.1038/nature10632
Katikaneni, A. et al. Lipid peroxidation regulates long-range wound detection through 5-lipoxygenase in zebrafish. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 1049–1055 (2020).
pubmed: 32868902 pmcid: 7898270 doi: 10.1038/s41556-020-0564-2
Blockus, H. & Chédotal, A. Slit-Robo signaling. Development 143, 3037–3044 (2016).
pubmed: 27578174 doi: 10.1242/dev.132829
Boyer, N. P. & Gupton, S. L. Revisiting netrin-1: one who guides (axons). Front. Cell Neurosci. 12, 221 (2018).
pubmed: 30108487 pmcid: 6080411 doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00221
Hu, S. & Zhu, L. Semaphorins and their receptors: from axonal guidance to atherosclerosis. Front. Physiol. 9, 1236 (2018).
pubmed: 30405423 pmcid: 6196129 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01236
Kania, A. & Klein, R. Mechanisms of ephrin-Eph signalling in development, physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 240–256 (2016).
pubmed: 26790531 doi: 10.1038/nrm.2015.16
Crick, F. Diffusion in embryogenesis. Nature 225, 420–422 (1970).
pubmed: 5411117 doi: 10.1038/225420a0
Majumdar, R., Sixt, M. & Parent, C. A. New paradigms in the establishment and maintenance of gradients during directed cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 30, 33–40 (2014).
pubmed: 24959970 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.05.010
Lau, S. et al. A negative-feedback loop maintains optimal chemokine concentrations for directional cell migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 266–273 (2020).
pubmed: 32042179 pmcid: 7809593 doi: 10.1038/s41556-020-0465-4
Stapornwongkul, K. S., de Gennes, M., Cocconi, L., Salbreux, G. & Vincent, J. P. Patterning and growth control in vivo by an engineered GFP gradient. Science 370, 321–327 (2020). Using a synthetic morphogen in D. melanogaster, the authors show that the expression of non-signalling decoy receptors improves the ability of receptors engineered to respond to the synthetic morphogen to organize patterning and growth in vivo.
pubmed: 33060356 pmcid: 7611032 doi: 10.1126/science.abb8205
Tweedy, L., Knecht, D. A., Mackay, G. M. & Insall, R. H. Self-generated chemoattractant gradients: attractant depletion extends the range and robustness of chemotaxis. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002404 (2016).
pubmed: 26981861 pmcid: 4794234 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002404
Muinonen-Martin, A. J. et al. Melanoma cells break down LPA to establish local gradients that drive chemotactic dispersal. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001966 (2014).
pubmed: 25313567 pmcid: 4196730 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001966
Juin, A. et al. N-WASP control of LPAR1 trafficking establishes response to self-generated LPA gradients to promote pancreatic cancer cell metastasis. Dev. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2019.09.018 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.09.018 pubmed: 31668663 pmcid: 6863394
Tweedy, L. et al. Seeing around corners: cells solve mazes and respond at a distance using attractant breakdown. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9792 (2020).
doi: 10.1126/science.aay9792 pubmed: 32855311
Pond, K. W., Doubrovinski, K. & Thorne, C. A. Wnt/β-catenin signaling in tissue self-organization. Genes (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11080939 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/genes11080939
Lu, P., Takai, K., Weaver, V. M. & Werb, Z. Extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling in development and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect Biol. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a005058 (2011).
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005058 pubmed: 21917992 pmcid: 3225943
Afonso, P. V., McCann, C. P., Kapnick, S. M. & Parent, C. A. Discoidin domain receptor 2 regulates neutrophil chemotaxis in 3D collagen matrices. Blood 121, 1644–1650 (2013).
pubmed: 23233663 pmcid: 3587327 doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-08-451575
Shields, J. D. et al. Autologous chemotaxis as a mechanism of tumor cell homing to lymphatics via interstitial flow and autocrine CCR7 signaling. Cancer Cell 11, 526–538 (2007).
pubmed: 17560334 doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.04.020
Polacheck, W. J., Charest, J. L. & Kamm, R. D. Interstitial flow influences direction of tumor cell migration through competing mechanisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11115–11120 (2011).
pubmed: 21690404 pmcid: 3131352 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103581108
Müller, P., Rogers, K. W., Yu, S. R., Brand, M. & Schier, A. F. Morphogen transport. Development 140, 1621–1638 (2013).
pubmed: 23533171 pmcid: 3621481 doi: 10.1242/dev.083519
Restrepo, S., Zartman, J. J. & Basler, K. Coordination of patterning and growth by the morphogen DPP. Curr. Biol. 24, R245–R255 (2014).
pubmed: 24650915 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.055
Kriebel, P. W., Barr, V. A., Rericha, E. C., Zhang, G. & Parent, C. A. Collective cell migration requires vesicular trafficking for chemoattractant delivery at the trailing edge. J. Cell Biol. 183, 949–961 (2008).
pubmed: 19047467 pmcid: 2592838 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200808105
Kriebel, P. W. et al. Extracellular vesicles direct migration by synthesizing and releasing chemotactic signals. J. Cell Biol. 217, 2891–2910 (2018).
pubmed: 29884750 pmcid: 6080930 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201710170
Esser, J. et al. Exosomes from human macrophages and dendritic cells contain enzymes for leukotriene biosynthesis and promote granulocyte migration. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 126, 1032–1040 (2010).
pubmed: 20728205 doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.06.039
Afonso, P. V. et al. LTB4 is a signal-relay molecule during neutrophil chemotaxis. Dev. Cell 22, 1079–1091 (2012).
pubmed: 22542839 pmcid: 4141281 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.02.003
Lämmermann, T. et al. Neutrophil swarms require LTB4 and integrins at sites of cell death in vivo. Nature 498, 371–375 (2013).
pubmed: 23708969 doi: 10.1038/nature12175
Brown, M. et al. Lymphatic exosomes promote dendritic cell migration along guidance cues. J. Cell. Biol. 217, 2205–2221 (2018).
pubmed: 29650776 pmcid: 5987709 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201612051
Chen, T., Guo, J., Yang, M., Zhu, X. & Cao, X. Chemokine-containing exosomes are released from heat-stressed tumor cells via lipid raft-dependent pathway and act as efficient tumor vaccine. J. Immunol. 186, 2219–2228 (2011).
pubmed: 21242526 doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002991
Lim, K. et al. Neutrophil trails guide influenza-specific CD8
pubmed: 26339033 pmcid: 4809646 doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4352
Sung, B. H., Ketova, T., Hoshino, D., Zijlstra, A. & Weaver, A. M. Directional cell movement through tissues is controlled by exosome secretion. Nat. Commun. 6, 7164 (2015).
pubmed: 25968605 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8164
Sung, B. H. & Weaver, A. M. Exosome secretion promotes chemotaxis of cancer cells. Cell Adh. Migr. 11, 187–195 (2017).
pubmed: 28129015 pmcid: 5351719 doi: 10.1080/19336918.2016.1273307
Hynes, R. O. Stretching the boundaries of extracellular matrix research. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 761–763 (2014).
pubmed: 25574535 doi: 10.1038/nrm3908
Charras, G. & Sahai, E. Physical influences of the extracellular environment on cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 813–824 (2014).
pubmed: 25355506 doi: 10.1038/nrm3897
Mouw, J. K., Ou, G. & Weaver, V. M. Extracellular matrix assembly: a multiscale deconstruction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 771–785 (2014).
pubmed: 25370693 pmcid: 4682873 doi: 10.1038/nrm3902
Bonnans, C., Chou, J. & Werb, Z. Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 786–801 (2014).
pubmed: 25415508 pmcid: 4316204 doi: 10.1038/nrm3904
Albacete-Albacete, L. et al. ECM deposition is driven by caveolin-1-dependent regulation of exosomal biogenesis and cargo sorting. J. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202006178 (2020).
doi: 10.1083/jcb.202006178 pubmed: 33053168 pmcid: 7551399
Zimmerman, S. P., Asokan, S. B., Kuhlman, B. & Bear, J. E. Cells lay their own tracks - optogenetic Cdc42 activation stimulates fibronectin deposition supporting directed migration. J. Cell Sci. 130, 2971–2983 (2017).
pubmed: 28754687 pmcid: 5612177
Singh, P., Carraher, C. & Schwarzbauer, J. E. Assembly of fibronectin extracellular matrix. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 26, 397–419 (2010).
pubmed: 20690820 pmcid: 3628685 doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104020
Miller, C. G., Budoff, G., Prenner, J. L. & Schwarzbauer, J. E. Minireview: fibronectin in retinal disease. Exp. Biol. Med. 242, 1–7 (2017).
doi: 10.1177/1535370216675245
Schultz, G. S. & Wysocki, A. Interactions between extracellular matrix and growth factors in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 17, 153–162 (2009).
pubmed: 19320882 doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00466.x
Li, Q., Park, P. W., Wilson, C. L. & Parks, W. C. Matrilysin shedding of syndecan-1 regulates chemokine mobilization and transepithelial efflux of neutrophils in acute lung injury. Cell 111, 635–646 (2002).
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01079-6
Schumann, K. et al. Immobilized chemokine fields and soluble chemokine gradients cooperatively shape migration patterns of dendritic cells. Immunity 32, 703–713 (2010).
pubmed: 20471289 doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.04.017
Zhu, M. et al. Spatial mapping of tissue properties in vivo reveals a 3D stiffness gradient in the mouse limb bud. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 4781–4791 (2020). This is a technical tour de force demonstrating the existence of stiffness gradients in mouse embryos.
pubmed: 32071242 pmcid: 7060671 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912656117
Tran, V. D. & Kumar, S. Transduction of cell and matrix geometric cues by the actin cytoskeleton. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 68, 64–71 (2020).
pubmed: 33075689 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2020.08.016
Cai, L., Xiong, X., Kong, X. & Xie, J. The role of the lysyl oxidases in tissue repair and remodeling: a concise review. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 14, 15–30 (2017).
pubmed: 30603458 pmcid: 6171574 doi: 10.1007/s13770-016-0007-0
Handorf, A. M., Zhou, Y., Halanski, M. A. & Li, W. J. Tissue stiffness dictates development, homeostasis, and disease progression. Organogenesis 11, 1–15 (2015).
pubmed: 25915734 pmcid: 4594591 doi: 10.1080/15476278.2015.1019687
Ye, M. et al. Evolving roles of lysyl oxidase family in tumorigenesis and cancer therapy. Pharmacol. Ther. 215, 107633 (2020).
pubmed: 32693113 doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107633
Alcudia, J. F. et al. Lysyl oxidase and endothelial dysfunction: mechanisms of lysyl oxidase down-regulation by pro-inflammatory cytokines. Front. Biosci. 13, 2721–2727 (2008).
pubmed: 17981747 doi: 10.2741/2879
Chen, Y., Peng, W., Raffetto, J. D. & Khalil, R. A. Matrix metalloproteinases in remodeling of lower extremity veins and chronic venous disease. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl Sci. 147, 267–299 (2017).
pubmed: 28413031 pmcid: 5411014 doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.02.003
Quintero-Fabián, S. et al. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in angiogenesis and cancer. Front. Oncol. 9, 1370 (2019).
pubmed: 31921634 pmcid: 6915110 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01370
Kaverina, I., Krylyshkina, O. & Small, J. V. Microtubule targeting of substrate contacts promotes their relaxation and dissociation. J. Cell. Biol. 146, 1033–1044 (1999).
pubmed: 10477757 pmcid: 2169483 doi: 10.1083/jcb.146.5.1033
Paul, C. D., Mistriotis, P. & Konstantopoulos, K. Cancer cell motility: lessons from migration in confined spaces. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 131–140 (2017).
pubmed: 27909339 doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.123
Wolf, K., Müller, R., Borgmann, S., Bröcker, E. B. & Friedl, P. Amoeboid shape change and contact guidance: T-lymphocyte crawling through fibrillar collagen is independent of matrix remodeling by MMPs and other proteases. Blood 102, 3262–3269 (2003).
pubmed: 12855577 doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-12-3791
Renkawitz, J. et al. Nuclear positioning facilitates amoeboid migration along the path of least resistance. Nature 568, 546–550 (2019). This seminal article shows that leukocytes position the nucleus frontwards to gauge the available space and choose their path.
pubmed: 30944468 pmcid: 7217284 doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1087-5
Castro-Castro, A. et al. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of MT1-MMP-dependent cancer cell invasion. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 32, 555–576 (2016).
pubmed: 27501444 doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125227
Wyckoff, J. B., Pinner, S. E., Gschmeissner, S., Condeelis, J. S. & Sahai, E. ROCK- and myosin-dependent matrix deformation enables protease-independent tumor-cell invasion in vivo. Curr. Biol. 16, 1515–1523 (2006).
pubmed: 16890527 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.065
Fisher, K. E. et al. MT1-MMP- and Cdc42-dependent signaling co-regulate cell invasion and tunnel formation in 3D collagen matrices. J. Cell Sci. 122, 4558–4569 (2009).
pubmed: 19934222 pmcid: 2787465 doi: 10.1242/jcs.050724
Weigelin, B., Bakker, G. J. & Friedl, P. Intravital third harmonic generation microscopy of collective melanoma cell invasion: Principles of interface guidance and microvesicle dynamics. Intravital 1, 32–43 (2012).
pubmed: 29607252 doi: 10.4161/intv.21223
Du Bois-Reymond, E. H. Vorläufiger Abriss einer Untersuchung über den sogenannten Froschstrom und über die elektromotorischen Fische. Ann. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.18431340102 (1843).
doi: 10.1002/andp.18431340102
Zhao, M. et al. Electrical signals control wound healing through phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase-gamma and PTEN. Nature 442, 457–460 (2006).
pubmed: 16871217 doi: 10.1038/nature04925
Hotary, K. B. & Robinson, K. R. Endogenous electrical currents and voltage gradients in Xenopus embryos and the consequences of their disruption. Dev. Biol. 166, 789–800 (1994).
pubmed: 7813796 doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1357
Klein, P. S. et al. A chemoattractant receptor controls development in Dictyostelium discoideum. Science 241, 1467–1472 (1988).
pubmed: 3047871 doi: 10.1126/science.3047871
Murphy, P. M. & Tiffany, H. L. Cloning of complementary DNA encoding a functional human interleukin-8 receptor. Science 253, 1280–1283 (1991).
pubmed: 1891716 doi: 10.1126/science.1891716
Holmes, W. E., Lee, J., Kuang, W. J., Rice, G. C. & Wood, W. I. Structure and functional expression of a human interleukin-8 receptor. Science 253, 1278–1280 (1991).
pubmed: 1840701 doi: 10.1126/science.1840701
Griffith, J. W., Sokol, C. L. & Luster, A. D. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: positioning cells for host defense and immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 32, 659–702 (2014).
pubmed: 24655300 doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120145
Hughes, C. E. & Nibbs, R. J. B. A guide to chemokines and their receptors. FEBS J. 285, 2944–2971 (2018).
pubmed: 29637711 pmcid: 6120486 doi: 10.1111/febs.14466
Zlotnik, A. & Yoshie, O. Chemokines: a new classification system and their role in immunity. Immunity 12, 121–127 (2000).
doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80165-X
Sallusto, F. & Baggiolini, M. Chemokines and leukocyte traffic. Nat. Immunol. 9, 949–952 (2008).
pubmed: 18711431 doi: 10.1038/ni.f.214
Locati, M. & Murphy, P. M. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: biology and clinical relevance in inflammation and AIDS. Annu. Rev. Med. 50, 425–440 (1999).
pubmed: 10073287 doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.50.1.425
Proudfoot, A. E. Chemokine receptors: multifaceted therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2, 106–115 (2002).
pubmed: 11910892 pmcid: 7097668 doi: 10.1038/nri722
He, H. Q. & Ye, R. D. The formyl peptide receptors: diversity of ligands and mechanism for recognition. Molecules https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22030455 (2017).
doi: 10.3390/molecules22030455 pubmed: 29286347 pmcid: 6017195
Yokomizo, T. Two distinct leukotriene B4 receptors, BLT1 and BLT2. J. Biochem. 157, 65–71 (2015).
pubmed: 25480980 doi: 10.1093/jb/mvu078
Sadik, C. D., Kim, N. D. & Luster, A. D. Neutrophils cascading their way to inflammation. Trends Immunol. 32, 452–460 (2011).
pubmed: 21839682 pmcid: 3470857 doi: 10.1016/j.it.2011.06.008
Anand-Apte, B. & Zetter, B. Signaling mechanisms in growth factor-stimulated cell motility. Stem Cells 15, 259–267 (1997).
pubmed: 9253109 doi: 10.1002/stem.150259
Vorotnikov, A. V. & Tyurin-Kuzmin, P. A. Chemotactic signaling in mesenchymal cells compared to amoeboid cells. Genes Dis. 1, 162–173 (2014).
pubmed: 30258862 pmcid: 6150068 doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2014.09.006
Bear, J. E. & Haugh, J. M. Directed migration of mesenchymal cells: where signaling and the cytoskeleton meet. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 30, 74–82 (2014).
pubmed: 24999834 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.06.005
Gorla, M. & Bashaw, G. J. Molecular mechanisms regulating axon responsiveness at the midline. Dev. Biol. 466, 12–21 (2020).
pubmed: 32818516 doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2020.08.006
Bellon, A. & Mann, F. Keeping up with advances in axon guidance. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 53, 183–191 (2018).
pubmed: 30273799 doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2018.09.004
Tessier-Lavigne, M. & Goodman, C. S. The molecular biology of axon guidance. Science 274, 1123–1133 (1996).
pubmed: 8895455 doi: 10.1126/science.274.5290.1123
Mirakaj, V. & Rosenberger, P. Immunomodulatory functions of neuronal guidance proteins. Trends Immunol. 38, 444–456 (2017).
pubmed: 28438491 doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.03.007
Wu, J. Y. et al. The neuronal repellent Slit inhibits leukocyte chemotaxis induced by chemotactic factors. Nature 410, 948–952 (2001).
pubmed: 11309622 pmcid: 2072862 doi: 10.1038/35073616
Tole, S. et al. The axonal repellent, Slit2, inhibits directional migration of circulating neutrophils. J. Leukoc. Biol. 86, 1403–1415 (2009).
pubmed: 19759280 doi: 10.1189/jlb.0609391
Pilling, D., Chinea, L. E., Consalvo, K. M. & Gomer, R. H. Different isoforms of the neuronal guidance molecule Slit2 directly cause chemoattraction or chemorepulsion of human neutrophils. J. Immunol. 202, 239–248 (2019).
pubmed: 30510066 doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800681
Huttenlocher, A. & Horwitz, A. R. Integrins in cell migration. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect Biol. 3, a005074 (2011).
pubmed: 21885598 pmcid: 3181029 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005074
Henning Stumpf, B., Ambriovic´-Ristov, A., Radenovic, A. & Smith, A. S. Recent advances and prospects in the research of nascent adhesions. Front. Physiol. 11, 574371 (2020).
pubmed: 33343382 pmcid: 7746844 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.574371
Schwarz, J. et al. Dendritic cells interpret haptotactic chemokine gradients in a manner governed by signal-to-noise ratio and dependent on GRK6. Curr Biol 27, 1314–1325 (2017). This study shows differential regulation of the same chemokine receptor in the context of a chemotactic and haptotactic cue.
pubmed: 28457871 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.004
Shellard, A. & Mayor, R. Durotaxis: the hard path from in vitro to in vivo. Dev. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2020.11.019 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.11.019 pubmed: 33290722
Sunyer, R. & Trepat, X. Durotaxis. Curr. Biol. 30, R383–r387 (2020).
pubmed: 32369745 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.051
Janmey, P. A., Fletcher, D. A. & Reinhart-King, C. A. Stiffness sensing by cells. Physiol. Rev. 100, 695–724 (2020).
pubmed: 31751165 doi: 10.1152/physrev.00013.2019
Astrof, N. S., Salas, A., Shimaoka, M., Chen, J. & Springer, T. A. Importance of force linkage in mechanochemistry of adhesion receptors. Biochemistry 45, 15020–15028 (2006).
pubmed: 17154539 doi: 10.1021/bi061566o
Jiang, G., Huang, A. H., Cai, Y., Tanase, M. & Sheetz, M. P. Rigidity sensing at the leading edge through alphavbeta3 integrins and RPTPalpha. Biophys. J. 90, 1804–1809 (2006).
pubmed: 16339875 doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.072462
Nordenfelt, P. et al. Direction of actin flow dictates integrin LFA-1 orientation during leukocyte migration. Nat. Commun. 8, 2047 (2017).
pubmed: 29229906 pmcid: 5725580 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01848-y
Moore, T. I., Aaron, J., Chew, T. L. & Springer, T. A. Measuring integrin conformational change on the cell surface with super-resolution microscopy. Cell Rep. 22, 1903–1912 (2018).
pubmed: 29444440 pmcid: 5851489 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.062
Lämmermann, T. et al. Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing. Nature 453, 51–55 (2008).
pubmed: 18451854 doi: 10.1038/nature06887
Hetmanski, J. H. R. et al. Membrane tension orchestrates rear retraction in matrix-directed cell migration. Dev. Cell 51, 460–475.e410 (2019). This recent study shows the importance of membrane tension in directed migration.
pubmed: 31607653 pmcid: 6863396 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.09.006
Sitarska, E. & Diz-Muñoz, A. Pay attention to membrane tension: mechanobiology of the cell surface. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 66, 11–18 (2020).
pubmed: 32416466 pmcid: 7594640 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2020.04.001
Baschieri, F. et al. Frustrated endocytosis controls contractility-independent mechanotransduction at clathrin-coated structures. Nat. Commun. 9, 3825 (2018).
pubmed: 30237420 pmcid: 6148028 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06367-y
Douguet, D. & Honoré, E. Mammalian mechanoelectrical transduction: structure and function of force-gated ion channels. Cell 179, 340–354 (2019).
pubmed: 31585078 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.049
Goult, B. T., Yan, J. & Schwartz, M. A. Talin as a mechanosensitive signaling hub. J. Cell Biol. 217, 3776–3784 (2018).
pubmed: 30254032 pmcid: 6219721 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201808061
Grashoff, C. et al. Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics. Nature 466, 263–266 (2010). This seminal article establishes a tension-based Förster resonance energy transfer biosensor using the focal adhesion protein vinculin.
pubmed: 20613844 pmcid: 2901888 doi: 10.1038/nature09198
Sawada, Y. et al. Force sensing by mechanical extension of the Src family kinase substrate p130Cas. Cell 127, 1015–1026 (2006).
pubmed: 17129785 pmcid: 2746973 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.044
MacKay, J. L. & Hammer, D. A. Stiff substrates enhance monocytic cell capture through E-selectin but not P-selectin. Integr. Biol. 8, 62–72 (2016).
doi: 10.1039/C5IB00199D
Sun, X. et al. Mechanosensing through direct binding of tensed F-Actin by LIM domains. Dev. Cell 55, 468–482.e467 (2020).
pubmed: 33058779 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.09.022
Winkelman, J. D., Anderson, C. A., Suarez, C., Kovar, D. R. & Gardel, M. L. Evolutionarily diverse LIM domain-containing proteins bind stressed actin filaments through a conserved mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 25532–25542 (2020). This article, along with Sun et al. (2020), shows that LIM domain-containing proteins bind differentially to actin filaments based on filament tension.
pubmed: 32989126 pmcid: 7568268 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004656117
Rong, Y. et al. The Golgi microtubules regulate single cell durotaxis. EMBO Rep. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202051094 (2021).
doi: 10.15252/embr.202051094 pubmed: 33559938
Guilluy, C. et al. Isolated nuclei adapt to force and reveal a mechanotransduction pathway in the nucleus. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 376–381 (2014).
pubmed: 24609268 pmcid: 4085695 doi: 10.1038/ncb2927
Arsenovic, P. T. et al. Nesprin-2G, a component of the nuclear LINC complex, is subject to myosin-dependent tension. Biophys. J. 110, 34–43 (2016).
pubmed: 26745407 pmcid: 4805861 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.014
Gomes, E. R., Jani, S. & Gundersen, G. G. Nuclear movement regulated by Cdc42, MRCK, myosin, and actin flow establishes MTOC polarization in migrating cells. Cell 121, 451–463 (2005).
pubmed: 15882626 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.022
Petrie, R. J., Koo, H. & Yamada, K. M. Generation of compartmentalized pressure by a nuclear piston governs cell motility in a 3D matrix. Science 345, 1062–1065 (2014).
pubmed: 25170155 pmcid: 5248932 doi: 10.1126/science.1256965
Lou, H. Y., Zhao, W., Zeng, Y. & Cui, B. The role of membrane curvature in nanoscale topography-induced intracellular signaling. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 1046–1053 (2018).
pubmed: 29648779 pmcid: 7384307 doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00594
Driscoll, M. K., Sun, X., Guven, C., Fourkas, J. T. & Losert, W. Cellular contact guidance through dynamic sensing of nanotopography. ACS Nano 8, 3546–3555 (2014).
pubmed: 24649900 pmcid: 4017610 doi: 10.1021/nn406637c
Chen, S. et al. Actin cytoskeleton and focal adhesions regulate the biased migration of breast cancer cells on nanoscale asymmetric sawteeth. ACS Nano 13, 1454–1468 (2019). This article shows that breast cancer cell lines exhibit different migration phenotypes on asymmetric sawtooth nanopatterns through the distinct regulation of actin polymerization waves and focal adhesion dynamics.
pubmed: 30707556 pmcid: 7159974
Le Maout, E., Lo Vecchio, S., Kumar Korla, P., Jinn-Chyuan Sheu, J. & Riveline, D. Ratchetaxis in channels: entry point and local asymmetry set cell directions in confinement. Biophys. J. 119, 1301–1308 (2020). This article shows how cell direction through 3D ratchet channels is dictated by spatial asymmetry in two-sided confined channels and the entry point of the all-sided confined channels.
pubmed: 33027610 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.08.028
Ramirez-San Juan, G. R., Oakes, P. W. & Gardel, M. L. Contact guidance requires spatial control of leading-edge protrusion. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 1043–1053 (2017).
pubmed: 28228548 pmcid: 5391181 doi: 10.1091/mbc.e16-11-0769
Jang, K. J. et al. Two distinct filopodia populations at the growth cone allow to sense nanotopographical extracellular matrix cues to guide neurite outgrowth. PLoS ONE 5, e15966 (2010).
pubmed: 21209862 pmcid: 3012734 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015966
Kubow, K. E., Shuklis, V. D., Sales, D. J. & Horwitz, A. R. Contact guidance persists under myosin inhibition due to the local alignment of adhesions and individual protrusions. Sci. Rep. 7, 14380 (2017). This is a key article showing that cells can sense the topology of aligned fibres even in the absence of myosin activity.
pubmed: 29085052 pmcid: 5662575 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14745-7
Lou, H. Y. et al. Membrane curvature underlies actin reorganization in response to nanoscale surface topography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23143–23151 (2019). This is an important article identifying membrane curvature-sensing BAR-family protein FBP17 as the bridge between surface topology and topology-induced reorganization of the actin network.
pubmed: 31591250 pmcid: 6859365 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910166116
McGregor, A. L., Hsia, C. R. & Lammerding, J. Squish and squeeze-the nucleus as a physical barrier during migration in confined environments. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 40, 32–40 (2016).
pubmed: 26895141 pmcid: 4887392 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.01.011
Lomakin, A. J. et al. The nucleus acts as a ruler tailoring cell responses to spatial constraints. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba2894 (2020).
doi: 10.1126/science.aba2894 pubmed: 33060332 pmcid: 8059074
Venturini, V. et al. The nucleus measures shape changes for cellular proprioception to control dynamic cell behavior. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba2644 (2020). This article, along with Lomakin et al. (2020), shows that cells interpret cell shape and control movement in confined spaces by gauging nuclear deformation and initiating signalling events at the nucleus.
doi: 10.1126/science.aba2644 pubmed: 33060331
Zhao, M. Electrical fields in wound healing — an overriding signal that directs cell migration. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 674–682 (2009).
pubmed: 19146969 doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.12.009
Allen, G. M., Mogilner, A. & Theriot, J. A. Electrophoresis of cellular membrane components creates the directional cue guiding keratocyte galvanotaxis. Curr. Biol. 23, 560–568 (2013). This is a key article establishing the mechanism of galvanotaxis.
pubmed: 23541731 pmcid: 3718648 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.047
Sarkar, A., Kobylkevich, B. M., Graham, D. M. & Messerli, M. A. Electromigration of cell surface macromolecules in DC electric fields during cell polarization and galvanotaxis. J. Theor. Biol. 478, 58–73 (2019).
pubmed: 31211960 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.06.015
Lin, B. J. et al. Lipid rafts sense and direct electric field-induced migration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 8568–8573 (2017).
pubmed: 28739955 pmcid: 5559012 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702526114
Li, X., Miao, Y., Pal, D. S. & Devreotes, P. N. Excitable networks controlling cell migration during development and disease. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 100, 133–142 (2020).
pubmed: 31836289 doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.11.001
Xiao, Z., Zhang, N., Murphy, D. B. & Devreotes, P. N. Dynamic distribution of chemoattractant receptors in living cells during chemotaxis and persistent stimulation. J. Cell Biol. 139, 365–374 (1997).
pubmed: 9334341 pmcid: 2139806 doi: 10.1083/jcb.139.2.365
Servant, G., Weiner, O. D., Neptune, E. R., Sedat, J. W. & Bourne, H. R. Dynamics of a chemoattractant receptor in living neutrophils during chemotaxis. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 1163–1178 (1999).
pubmed: 10198064 pmcid: 25243 doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.4.1163
Nieto, M. et al. Polarization of chemokine receptors to the leading edge during lymphocyte chemotaxis. J. Exp. Med. 186, 153–158 (1997).
pubmed: 9207004 pmcid: 2198956 doi: 10.1084/jem.186.1.153
Bailly, M. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor distribution during chemotactic responses. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 3873–3883 (2000).
pubmed: 11071913 pmcid: 15043 doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.11.3873
Bergeron, J. J., Di Guglielmo, G. M., Dahan, S., Dominguez, M. & Posner, B. I. Spatial and temporal regulation of receptor tyrosine kinase activation and intracellular signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 85, 573–597 (2016).
pubmed: 27023845 doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014659
Callan-Jones, A. C. & Voituriez, R. Actin flows in cell migration: from locomotion and polarity to trajectories. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 38, 12–17 (2016).
pubmed: 26827283 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.01.003
Parent, C. A., Blacklock, B. J., Froehlich, W. M., Murphy, D. B. & Devreotes, P. N. G protein signaling events are activated at the leading edge of chemotactic cells. Cell 95, 81–91 (1998).
pubmed: 9778249 doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81784-5
Servant, G. et al. Polarization of chemoattractant receptor signaling during neutrophil chemotaxis. Science 287, 1037–1040 (2000).
pubmed: 10669415 pmcid: 2822871 doi: 10.1126/science.287.5455.1037
Haugh, J. M., Codazzi, F., Teruel, M. & Meyer, T. Spatial sensing in fibroblasts mediated by 3’ phosphoinositides. J. Cell Biol. 151, 1269–1280 (2000).
pubmed: 11121441 pmcid: 2190602 doi: 10.1083/jcb.151.6.1269
Artemenko, Y., Lampert, T. J. & Devreotes, P. N. Moving towards a paradigm: common mechanisms of chemotactic signaling in Dictyostelium and mammalian leukocytes. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 71, 3711–3747 (2014).
pubmed: 24846395 pmcid: 4162842 doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1638-8
Kunisaki, Y. et al. DOCK2 is a Rac activator that regulates motility and polarity during neutrophil chemotaxis. J. Cell Biol. 174, 647–652 (2006).
pubmed: 16943182 pmcid: 2064308 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200602142
Zhao, T. et al. Signaling requirements for translocation of P-Rex1, a key Rac2 exchange factor involved in chemoattractant-stimulated human neutrophil function. J. Leukoc. Biol. 81, 1127–1136 (2007).
pubmed: 17227822 doi: 10.1189/jlb.0406251
Yan, J. et al. A Gβγ effector, ElmoE, transduces GPCR signaling to the actin network during chemotaxis. Dev. Cell 22, 92–103 (2012).
pubmed: 22264729 pmcid: 6993146 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.11.007
Asokan, S. B. et al. Mesenchymal chemotaxis requires selective inactivation of myosin II at the leading edge via a noncanonical PLCgamma/PKCalpha pathway. Dev. Cell 31, 747–760 (2014).
pubmed: 25482883 pmcid: 4276478 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.10.024
Hoeller, O. & Kay, R. R. Chemotaxis in the absence of PIP3 gradients. CB 17, 813–817 (2007).
pubmed: 17462897
Liu, L., Das, S., Losert, W. & Parent, C. A. mTORC2 regulates neutrophil chemotaxis in a cAMP- and RhoA-dependent fashion. Dev. Cell 19, 845–857 (2010).
pubmed: 21145500 pmcid: 3071587 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.11.004
Chen, M. Y., Long, Y. & Devreotes, P. N. A novel cytosolic regulator, Pianissimo, is required for chemoattractant receptor and G protein-mediated activation of the 12 transmembrane domain adenylyl cyclase in Dictyostelium. Genes Dev. 11, 3218–3231 (1997).
pubmed: 9389653 pmcid: 316743 doi: 10.1101/gad.11.23.3218
Lee, S. et al. TOR complex 2 integrates cell movement during chemotaxis and signal relay in Dictyostelium. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 4572–4583 (2005).
pubmed: 16079174 pmcid: 1237065 doi: 10.1091/mbc.e05-04-0342
He, Y. et al. Mammalian target of rapamycin and Rictor control neutrophil chemotaxis by regulating Rac/Cdc42 activity and the actin cytoskeleton. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 3369–3380 (2013).
pubmed: 24006489 pmcid: 3814157 doi: 10.1091/mbc.e13-07-0405
Chen, L. et al. PLA2 and PI3K/PTEN pathways act in parallel to mediate chemotaxis. Dev. Cell 12, 603–614 (2007).
pubmed: 17419997 pmcid: 1986835 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.03.005
van Haastert, P. J., Keizer-Gunnink, I. & Kortholt, A. Essential role of PI3-kinase and phospholipase A
pubmed: 17535967 pmcid: 2064281 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200701134
Heit, B. et al. PTEN functions to ‘prioritize’ chemotactic cues and prevent ‘distraction’ in migrating neutrophils. Nat. Immunol. 9, 743–752 (2008).
pubmed: 18536720 doi: 10.1038/ni.1623
Meliton, A. Y. et al. Cytosolic group IVa phospholipase A
doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-7-14
Yonker, L. M. et al. Neutrophil-derived cytosolic PLA2α contributes to bacterial-induced neutrophil transepithelial migration. J. Immunol. 199, 2873–2884 (2017).
pubmed: 28887431 doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700539
Ma, H., Gamper, M., Parent, C. & Firtel, R. A. The Dictyostelium MAP kinase kinase DdMEK1 regulates chemotaxis and is essential for chemoattractant-mediated activation of guanylyl cyclase. EMBO J. 16, 4317–4332 (1997).
pubmed: 9250676 pmcid: 1170058 doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.14.4317
Mendoza, M. C., Booth, E. O., Shaulsky, G. & Firtel, R. A. MEK1 and protein phosphatase 4 coordinate Dictyostelium development and chemotaxis. Mol. Cell Biol. 27, 3817–3827 (2007).
pubmed: 17353263 pmcid: 1899987 doi: 10.1128/MCB.02194-06
Heit, B., Tavener, S., Raharjo, E. & Kubes, P. An intracellular signaling hierarchy determines direction of migration in opposing chemotactic gradients. J. Cell Biol. 159, 91–102 (2002).
pubmed: 12370241 pmcid: 2173486 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200202114
Liu, X. et al. Bidirectional regulation of neutrophil migration by mitogen-activated protein kinases. Nat. Immunol. 13, 457–464 (2012).
pubmed: 22447027 pmcid: 3330201 doi: 10.1038/ni.2258
Mouneimne, G. et al. Spatial and temporal control of cofilin activity is required for directional sensing during chemotaxis. Curr. Biol. 16, 2193–2205 (2006).
pubmed: 17113383 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.016
Miao, Y. et al. Altering the threshold of an excitable signal transduction network changes cell migratory modes. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 329–340 (2017).
pubmed: 28346441 pmcid: 5394931 doi: 10.1038/ncb3495
Zhan, H. et al. An excitable Ras/PI3K/ERK signaling network controls migration and oncogenic transformation in epithelial cells. Dev. Cell 54, 608–623.e605 (2020).
pubmed: 32877650 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.08.001
King, S. J. et al. Lamellipodia are crucial for haptotactic sensing and response. J. Cell Sci. 129, 2329–2342 (2016).
pubmed: 27173494 pmcid: 4920251
Cox, C. D., Bavi, N. & Martinac, B. Biophysical principles of ion-channel-mediated mechanosensory transduction. Cell Rep. 29, 1–12 (2019).
pubmed: 31577940 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.075
Pal, N., Wu, M. & Lu, H. P. Probing conformational dynamics of an enzymatic active site by an in situ single fluorogenic probe under piconewton force manipulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 15006–15011 (2016).
pubmed: 27940917 pmcid: 5206548 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613404114
Hu, X., Margadant, F. M., Yao, M. & Sheetz, M. P. Molecular stretching modulates mechanosensing pathways. Protein Sci. 26, 1337–1351 (2017).
pubmed: 28474792 pmcid: 5477536 doi: 10.1002/pro.3188
Kumar, A. et al. Talin tension sensor reveals novel features of focal adhesion force transmission and mechanosensitivity. J. Cell Biol. 213, 371–383 (2016).
pubmed: 27161398 pmcid: 4862330 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201510012
Rothenberg, K. E., Scott, D. W., Christoforou, N. & Hoffman, B. D. Vinculin force-sensitive dynamics at focal adhesions enable effective directed cell migration. Biophys. J. 114, 1680–1694 (2018). This recent work using the vinculin Förster resonance energy transfer-based tension sensor shows precise regulation of tension at different focal adhesions during directed migration.
pubmed: 29642037 pmcid: 5954296 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.02.019
Ringer, P. et al. Multiplexing molecular tension sensors reveals piconewton force gradient across talin-1. Nat Methods 14, 1090–1096 (2017).
pubmed: 28945706 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4431
LaCroix, A. S., Lynch, A. D., Berginski, M. E. & Hoffman, B. D. Tunable molecular tension sensors reveal extension-based control of vinculin loading. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33927 (2018).
doi: 10.7554/eLife.33927 pubmed: 30024378 pmcid: 6053308
Huang, D. L., Bax, N. A., Buckley, C. D., Weis, W. I. & Dunn, A. R. Vinculin forms a directionally asymmetric catch bond with F-actin. Science 357, 703–706 (2017).
pubmed: 28818948 pmcid: 5821505 doi: 10.1126/science.aan2556
Owen, L. M., Bax, N. A., Weis, W. I. & Dunn, A. R. The C-terminal actin binding domain of talin forms an asymmetric catch bond with F-actin. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.01.276568 (2020).
doi: 10.1101/2020.09.01.276568 pubmed: 32935104 pmcid: 7239067
Singh, A. V. et al. Astrocytes increase ATP exocytosis mediated calcium signaling in response to microgroove structures. Sci. Rep. 5, 7847 (2015).
pubmed: 25597401 pmcid: 4297955 doi: 10.1038/srep07847
Hung, W. C. et al. Confinement sensing and signal optimization via Piezo1/PKA and myosin II pathways. Cell Rep. 15, 1430–1441 (2016).
pubmed: 27160899 pmcid: 5341576 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.035
Bavi, N., Richardson, J., Heu, C., Martinac, B. & Poole, K. PIEZO1-mediated currents are modulated by substrate mechanics. ACS Nano 13, 13545–13559 (2019). This article shows that the surface geometry, including roughness and stiffness, modulates PIEZO1 channel activation in response to the external mechanical force applied at cell–substrate interfaces.
pubmed: 31689081 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b07499
Subramanian, B. C. et al. The LTB4-BLT1 axis regulates actomyosin and β2-integrin dynamics during neutrophil extravasation. J. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201910215 (2020). This article reports a critical role for neutrophil-derived LTB
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201910215 pubmed: 32854115 pmcid: 7659729
Gao, R. et al. A large-scale screen reveals genes that mediate electrotaxis in Dictyostelium discoideum. Sci. Signal 8, ra50 (2015).
pubmed: 26012633 pmcid: 4470479 doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aab0562
Sánchez, M. F., Els-Heindl, S., Beck-Sickinger, A. G., Wieneke, R. & Tampé, R. Photo-induced receptor confinement drives ligand-independent GPCR signaling. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb7657 (2021).
doi: 10.1126/science.abb7657 pubmed: 34140386
Smith, H. E. Nematode sperm motility. WormBook https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.68.2 (2014).
doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.68.2 pubmed: 24715710 pmcid: 5402208
Pollard, T. D. & Borisy, G. G. Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell 112, 453–465 (2003).
pubmed: 12600310 doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00120-X
Bodor, D. L., Pönisch, W., Endres, R. G. & Paluch, E. K. Of cell shapes and motion: the physical basis of animal cell migration. Dev. Cell 52, 550–562 (2020).
pubmed: 32155438 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.02.013
Krause, M. & Gautreau, A. Steering cell migration: lamellipodium dynamics and the regulation of directional persistence. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 577–590 (2014).
pubmed: 25145849 doi: 10.1038/nrm3861
McCormick, L. E. & Gupton, S. L. Mechanistic advances in axon pathfinding. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 63, 11–19 (2020).
pubmed: 31927278 pmcid: 7247931 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.12.003
Johnson, H. E. et al. F-actin bundles direct the initiation and orientation of lamellipodia through adhesion-based signaling. J. Cell Biol. 208, 443–455 (2015).
pubmed: 25666809 pmcid: 4332254 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201406102
Svitkina, T. M. et al. Mechanism of filopodia initiation by reorganization of a dendritic network. J. Cell Biol. 160, 409–421 (2003).
pubmed: 12566431 pmcid: 2172658 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200210174
Wu, C. et al. Arp2/3 is critical for lamellipodia and response to extracellular matrix cues but is dispensable for chemotaxis. Cell 148, 973–987 (2012). This is the first article to establish that the Arp2/3 complex is required for ECM haptotaxis but is dispensable for RTK-dependent chemotaxis in fibroblasts.
pubmed: 22385962 pmcid: 3707508 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.034
Schaks, M., Giannone, G. & Rottner, K. Actin dynamics in cell migration. Essays Biochem. 63, 483–495 (2019).
pubmed: 31551324 pmcid: 6823167 doi: 10.1042/EBC20190015
Collins, S. R. et al. Using light to shape chemical gradients for parallel and automated analysis of chemotaxis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 804 (2015).
pubmed: 25908733 pmcid: 4422560 doi: 10.15252/msb.20156027
Davidson, A. J., Amato, C., Thomason, P. A. & Insall, R. H. WASP family proteins and formins compete in pseudopod- and bleb-based migration. J. Cell Biol. 217, 701–714 (2018).
pubmed: 29191847 pmcid: 5800805 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201705160
Vargas, P. et al. Innate control of actin nucleation determines two distinct migration behaviours in dendritic cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 43–53 (2016).
pubmed: 26641718 doi: 10.1038/ncb3284
Menon, S. et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIM9 is a filopodia off switch required for netrin-dependent axon guidance. Dev. Cell 35, 698–712 (2015).
pubmed: 26702829 pmcid: 4707677 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.11.022
Oakes, P. W. et al. Lamellipodium is a myosin-independent mechanosensor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2646–2651 (2018).
pubmed: 29487208 pmcid: 5856528 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715869115
Wong, S., Guo, W. H. & Wang, Y. L. Fibroblasts probe substrate rigidity with filopodia extensions before occupying an area. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17176–17181 (2014).
pubmed: 25404288 pmcid: 4260597 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412285111
Andrew, N. & Insall, R. H. Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of PtdIns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 193–200 (2007).
pubmed: 17220879 doi: 10.1038/ncb1536
Welf, E. S., Ahmed, S., Johnson, H. E., Melvin, A. T. & Haugh, J. M. Migrating fibroblasts reorient directionality by a metastable, PI3K-dependent mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 197, 105–114 (2012).
pubmed: 22472441 pmcid: 3317800 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201108152
Sun, X. et al. Asymmetric nanotopography biases cytoskeletal dynamics and promotes unidirectional cell guidance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12557–12562 (2015).
pubmed: 26417076 pmcid: 4611618 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502970112
Vicente-Manzanares, M., Ma, X., Adelstein, R. S. & Horwitz, A. R. Non-muscle myosin II takes centre stage in cell adhesion and migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 778–790 (2009).
pubmed: 19851336 pmcid: 2834236 doi: 10.1038/nrm2786
Plotnikov, S. V., Pasapera, A. M., Sabass, B. & Waterman, C. M. Force fluctuations within focal adhesions mediate ECM-rigidity sensing to guide directed cell migration. Cell 151, 1513–1527 (2012).
pubmed: 23260139 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.034
Chan, K. T., Bennin, D. A. & Huttenlocher, A. Regulation of adhesion dynamics by calpain-mediated proteolysis of focal adhesion kinase (FAK). J. Biol. Chem. 285, 11418–11426 (2010).
pubmed: 20150423 pmcid: 2857020 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.090746
Mayor, R. & Etienne-Manneville, S. The front and rear of collective cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 97–109 (2016).
pubmed: 26726037 doi: 10.1038/nrm.2015.14
Ladoux, B. & Mège, R. M. Mechanobiology of collective cell behaviours. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 743–757 (2017).
pubmed: 29115298 doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.98
Shellard, A., Szabó, A., Trepat, X. & Mayor, R. Supracellular contraction at the rear of neural crest cell groups drives collective chemotaxis. Science 362, 339–343 (2018). This article shows a rear wheel drive-like motility during collective chemotaxis by actomyosin contractility in a cluster of rear cells.
pubmed: 30337409 pmcid: 6218007 doi: 10.1126/science.aau3301
Yam, P. T. et al. Actin-myosin network reorganization breaks symmetry at the cell rear to spontaneously initiate polarized cell motility. J. Cell Biol. 178, 1207–1221 (2007).
pubmed: 17893245 pmcid: 2064654 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200706012
Tsai, T. Y. et al. Efficient front-rear coupling in neutrophil chemotaxis by dynamic myosin II localization. Dev. Cell 49, 189–205.e186 (2019). This article shows that the side-to-side redistribution of myosin II at the back of cells in response to leading-edge turning is critical for maintaining persistence and turning ability in neutrophils undergoing chemotaxis.
pubmed: 31014479 pmcid: 6708378 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.03.025
Allen, G. M. et al. Cell mechanics at the rear act to steer the direction of cell migration. Cell Syst. 11, 286–299.e284 (2020).
pubmed: 32916096 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2020.08.008
Charras, G. & Paluch, E. Blebs lead the way: how to migrate without lamellipodia. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 730–736 (2008).
pubmed: 18628785 doi: 10.1038/nrm2453
Zatulovskiy, E., Tyson, R., Bretschneider, T. & Kay, R. R. Bleb-driven chemotaxis of Dictyostelium cells. J. Cell Biol. 204, 1027–1044 (2014).
pubmed: 24616222 pmcid: 3998804 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201306147
Reversat, A. et al. Cellular locomotion using environmental topography. Nature 582, 582–585 (2020). This article identifies friction force generated by retrograde flow of actin propelling cells forward through a 3D environment in the absence of integrin engagement.
pubmed: 32581372 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2283-z
Aoun, L. et al. Amoeboid swimming is propelled by molecular paddling in lymphocytes. Biophys. J. 119, 1157–1177 (2020). This fascinating recent work demonstrates a new mechanism of cell swimming using ‘molecular paddling’ of cell surface proteins coupled to flow of the underlying cell cortex.
pubmed: 32882187 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.07.033
Purcell, E. M. Life at low Reynolds number. Am. J. Phys. 45, 3–11 (1977).
doi: 10.1119/1.10903
Yamada, K. M. & Sixt, M. Mechanisms of 3D cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 738–752 (2019).
pubmed: 31582855 doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0172-9
Dai, W. et al. Tissue topography steers migrating Drosophila border cells. Science 370, 987–990 (2020). This article shows that while chemical cues promote posterior movement, topographical cues provide orthogonal information and a path of least resistance during the migration of border cells in the egg chamber of D. melanogaster embryos.
pubmed: 33214282 doi: 10.1126/science.aaz4741
Mathias, J. R. et al. Resolution of inflammation by retrograde chemotaxis of neutrophils in transgenic zebrafish. J. Leukoc. Biol. 80, 1281–1288 (2006).
pubmed: 16963624 doi: 10.1189/jlb.0506346
Wang, J. et al. Visualizing the function and fate of neutrophils in sterile injury and repair. Science 358, 111–116 (2017).
pubmed: 28983053 doi: 10.1126/science.aam9690
Hind, L. E. & Huttenlocher, A. Neutrophil reverse migration and a chemokinetic resolution. Dev. Cell 47, 404–405 (2018).
pubmed: 30458135 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.11.004
Paluch, E. K., Aspalter, I. M. & Sixt, M. Focal adhesion-independent cell migration. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 32, 469–490 (2016).
pubmed: 27501447 doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125341
Shellard, A. & Mayor, R. All roads lead to directional cell migration. Trends Cell Biol. 30, 852–868 (2020).
pubmed: 32873438 doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.08.002
Haeger, A., Wolf, K., Zegers, M. M. & Friedl, P. Collective cell migration: guidance principles and hierarchies. Trends Cell Biol. 25, 556–566 (2015).
pubmed: 26137890 doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.06.003
Lämmermann, T. & Sixt, M. Mechanical modes of ‘amoeboid’ cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 636–644 (2009).
pubmed: 19523798 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.05.003
Pagès, D.-L. et al. Cell clusters adopt a collective amoeboid mode of migration in confined non-adhesive environments. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.28.106203 (2020).
doi: 10.1101/2020.05.28.106203
Liu, Y. J. et al. Confinement and low adhesion induce fast amoeboid migration of slow mesenchymal cells. Cell 160, 659–672 (2015).
pubmed: 25679760 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.007
Ruprecht, V. et al. Cortical contractility triggers a stochastic switch to fast amoeboid cell motility. Cell 160, 673–685 (2015).
pubmed: 25679761 pmcid: 4328143 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.008
Graziano, B. R. et al. Cell confinement reveals a branched-actin independent circuit for neutrophil polarity. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000457 (2019).
pubmed: 31600188 pmcid: 6805013 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000457
Lehmann, S. et al. Hypoxia induces a HIF-1-dependent transition from collective-to-amoeboid dissemination in epithelial cancer cells. Curr. Biol. 27, 392–400 (2017).
pubmed: 28089517 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.057

Auteurs

Shuvasree SenGupta (S)

Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Carole A Parent (CA)

Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

James E Bear (JE)

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. jbear@email.unc.edu.
Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. jbear@email.unc.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH