Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme: An International Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 22 Prospective Trials.


Journal

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 10 2021
Historique:
received: 14 01 2021
revised: 06 04 2021
accepted: 01 05 2021
pubmed: 16 5 2021
medline: 30 9 2021
entrez: 15 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Limited evidence is available on the utility of dose-escalated radiation therapy (DE-RT) with or without temozolomide (TMZ) versus standard-of-care radiation therapy (SoC-RT) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. We performed a systematic review/meta-analysis to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between DE-RT and SoC-RT. We used a Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses/Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology selection criterion to identify studies. The primary and secondary outcomes were 1-year OS and 1-year PFS, respectively. Outcomes and comparisons were subdivided based on receipt of TMZ and MGMT status. DE-RT was defined based on equivalent dose calculations. Random effects meta-analyses using the Knapp-Hartung correction, arcsine transformation, and restricted maximum likelihood method were conducted. Meta-regression was used to compare therapeutic (eg, DE-RT or TMZ) and pathologic characteristics (eg, MGMT methylation status) using the Wald-type test. Across 22 published studies, 2198 patients with glioblastoma multiforme were included; 507 received DE-RT. One-year OS after DE-RT alone was higher than SoC-RT alone (46.3% vs 23.4%; P = .02) as was 1-year PFS (17.9% vs 5.3%; P = .02). No significant difference in 1-year OS (73.2% vs 64.4%; P = .23) or 1-year PFS (44.5% vs 44.3%; P = .33) between DE-RT + TMZ and SoC-RT + TMZ was noted. No difference in 1-year OS was noted between DE-RT + TMZ and SoC-RT + TMZ in either MGMT methylated (83.2% vs 73.2%; P = .23) or MGMT unmethylated (72.6% vs 50.6%; P = .16) patients. DE-RT alone resulted in superior PFS and OS versus SoC-RT alone. DE-RT + TMZ did not lead to improved outcomes versus SoC-RT + TMZ. No differential benefit based on MGMT status was found. Future studies are warranted to define which subgroups benefit most from DE-RT.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33991621
pii: S0360-3016(21)00488-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.001
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Tumor Suppressor Proteins 0
DNA Modification Methylases EC 2.1.1.-
MGMT protein, human EC 2.1.1.63
DNA Repair Enzymes EC 6.5.1.-
Temozolomide YF1K15M17Y

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

371-384

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Raj Singh (R)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia.

Eric J Lehrer (EJ)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Ming Wang (M)

Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Haley K Perlow (HK)

Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

Nicholas G Zaorsky (NG)

Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Daniel M Trifiletti (DM)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.

Joseph Bovi (J)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Pierina Navarria (P)

Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy.

Silvia Scoccianti (S)

Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.

Vinai Gondi (V)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Paul D Brown (PD)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Joshua D Palmer (JD)

Department of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia. Electronic address: joshua.palmer@osumc.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH