Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme: An International Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 22 Prospective Trials.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brain Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Child
DNA Modification Methylases
/ metabolism
DNA Repair Enzymes
/ metabolism
Glioblastoma
/ drug therapy
Humans
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Radiotherapy Dosage
Standard of Care
Temozolomide
/ therapeutic use
Tumor Suppressor Proteins
/ metabolism
Young Adult
Journal
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 10 2021
01 10 2021
Historique:
received:
14
01
2021
revised:
06
04
2021
accepted:
01
05
2021
pubmed:
16
5
2021
medline:
30
9
2021
entrez:
15
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Limited evidence is available on the utility of dose-escalated radiation therapy (DE-RT) with or without temozolomide (TMZ) versus standard-of-care radiation therapy (SoC-RT) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. We performed a systematic review/meta-analysis to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between DE-RT and SoC-RT. We used a Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses/Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology selection criterion to identify studies. The primary and secondary outcomes were 1-year OS and 1-year PFS, respectively. Outcomes and comparisons were subdivided based on receipt of TMZ and MGMT status. DE-RT was defined based on equivalent dose calculations. Random effects meta-analyses using the Knapp-Hartung correction, arcsine transformation, and restricted maximum likelihood method were conducted. Meta-regression was used to compare therapeutic (eg, DE-RT or TMZ) and pathologic characteristics (eg, MGMT methylation status) using the Wald-type test. Across 22 published studies, 2198 patients with glioblastoma multiforme were included; 507 received DE-RT. One-year OS after DE-RT alone was higher than SoC-RT alone (46.3% vs 23.4%; P = .02) as was 1-year PFS (17.9% vs 5.3%; P = .02). No significant difference in 1-year OS (73.2% vs 64.4%; P = .23) or 1-year PFS (44.5% vs 44.3%; P = .33) between DE-RT + TMZ and SoC-RT + TMZ was noted. No difference in 1-year OS was noted between DE-RT + TMZ and SoC-RT + TMZ in either MGMT methylated (83.2% vs 73.2%; P = .23) or MGMT unmethylated (72.6% vs 50.6%; P = .16) patients. DE-RT alone resulted in superior PFS and OS versus SoC-RT alone. DE-RT + TMZ did not lead to improved outcomes versus SoC-RT + TMZ. No differential benefit based on MGMT status was found. Future studies are warranted to define which subgroups benefit most from DE-RT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33991621
pii: S0360-3016(21)00488-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.001
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Tumor Suppressor Proteins
0
DNA Modification Methylases
EC 2.1.1.-
MGMT protein, human
EC 2.1.1.63
DNA Repair Enzymes
EC 6.5.1.-
Temozolomide
YF1K15M17Y
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
371-384Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.