Associations between significant head injury and persisting disability and violent crime in women in prison in Scotland, UK: a cross-sectional study.
Adult
Aged
Craniocerebral Trauma
/ epidemiology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disabled Persons
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Logistic Models
Mental Health
Middle Aged
Prevalence
Prisons
Risk Factors
Scotland
/ epidemiology
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
/ epidemiology
Substance-Related Disorders
/ epidemiology
Violence
/ statistics & numerical data
Young Adult
Journal
The lancet. Psychiatry
ISSN: 2215-0374
Titre abrégé: Lancet Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101638123
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
received:
08
01
2021
revised:
22
02
2021
accepted:
22
02
2021
pubmed:
17
5
2021
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
16
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The prevalence of head injury is estimated to be as high as 55% in women in prison and might be a risk factor for violent offending, but evidence is equivocal. The extent of persisting disability is unknown, making decisions about service needs difficult. The UN recognises vulnerabilities in women in prison, but does not include head injury. This study aimed to investigate relationships among head injury, comorbidities, disability, and offending in women in prison. In this cross-sectional study, women were recruited between Feb 2, 2018, and Sept 30, 2019, from four prisons across Scotland, UK: Her Majesty's Prison (HMP) Cornton Vale, Her Majesty's Young Offenders Institute Polmont, HMP Edinburgh, and HMP Greenock (detaining approximately 355 individuals at the time of recruitment). Women were included if they were aged older than 16 years, fluent in English, able to participate in face-to-face assessment and provide informed consent, and did not have a severe acute disorder of cognition or communication. Head injury, cognition, disability, mental health, and history of abuse and problematic substance use were assessed by interview. History of head injury was assessed with the Ohio State University Traumatic Brain Injury Identification method and disability was assessed with the Glasgow Outcome at Discharge Scale. Comparisons were made between women with and without a history of significant head injury. We recruited 109 (31%) of the 355 women in these prisons. The sample was demographically representative of the approximately 400 individuals in women's prisons in Scotland. Significant head injury (SHI) was found in 85 (78%) of 109 women, of whom 34 (40%) had associated disability. Repeat head injury was reported in 71 (84%) of the 85 women with SHI and, in most cases, this resulted from domestic abuse that had occurred over many years. Women with a history of SHI were significantly more likely to have a history of violent offences than those without a history of SHI (66 [79%] of 85 women in the SHI group vs 13 [54%] of 24 women in the no-SHI group had committed a violent offence; odds ratio [OR] 3·1, 95% CI 1·2-8·1). This effect remained significant after adjusting for current factors (3·1, 1·1-9·0), including comorbidities associated with post-traumatic stress disorder, and was no longer statistically significant after adjusting for historical factors (3·3, 1·0-10·9), such as abuse as a child or adult. Women with SHI had spent longer in prison than women without SHI after adjustment for current (rate ratio 3·4, 1·3-8·4) or historical (3·5, 1·3-9·2) risk factors. It is recognised that women in prison are vulnerable because of histories of abuse and problematic substance use; however, history of SHI needs to be included when developing criminal justice policy, interventions to reduce mental health morbidity, and assessment and management of risk of violent offending. The Scottish Government.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The prevalence of head injury is estimated to be as high as 55% in women in prison and might be a risk factor for violent offending, but evidence is equivocal. The extent of persisting disability is unknown, making decisions about service needs difficult. The UN recognises vulnerabilities in women in prison, but does not include head injury. This study aimed to investigate relationships among head injury, comorbidities, disability, and offending in women in prison.
METHODS
In this cross-sectional study, women were recruited between Feb 2, 2018, and Sept 30, 2019, from four prisons across Scotland, UK: Her Majesty's Prison (HMP) Cornton Vale, Her Majesty's Young Offenders Institute Polmont, HMP Edinburgh, and HMP Greenock (detaining approximately 355 individuals at the time of recruitment). Women were included if they were aged older than 16 years, fluent in English, able to participate in face-to-face assessment and provide informed consent, and did not have a severe acute disorder of cognition or communication. Head injury, cognition, disability, mental health, and history of abuse and problematic substance use were assessed by interview. History of head injury was assessed with the Ohio State University Traumatic Brain Injury Identification method and disability was assessed with the Glasgow Outcome at Discharge Scale. Comparisons were made between women with and without a history of significant head injury.
FINDINGS
We recruited 109 (31%) of the 355 women in these prisons. The sample was demographically representative of the approximately 400 individuals in women's prisons in Scotland. Significant head injury (SHI) was found in 85 (78%) of 109 women, of whom 34 (40%) had associated disability. Repeat head injury was reported in 71 (84%) of the 85 women with SHI and, in most cases, this resulted from domestic abuse that had occurred over many years. Women with a history of SHI were significantly more likely to have a history of violent offences than those without a history of SHI (66 [79%] of 85 women in the SHI group vs 13 [54%] of 24 women in the no-SHI group had committed a violent offence; odds ratio [OR] 3·1, 95% CI 1·2-8·1). This effect remained significant after adjusting for current factors (3·1, 1·1-9·0), including comorbidities associated with post-traumatic stress disorder, and was no longer statistically significant after adjusting for historical factors (3·3, 1·0-10·9), such as abuse as a child or adult. Women with SHI had spent longer in prison than women without SHI after adjustment for current (rate ratio 3·4, 1·3-8·4) or historical (3·5, 1·3-9·2) risk factors.
INTERPRETATION
It is recognised that women in prison are vulnerable because of histories of abuse and problematic substance use; however, history of SHI needs to be included when developing criminal justice policy, interventions to reduce mental health morbidity, and assessment and management of risk of violent offending.
FUNDING
The Scottish Government.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33992149
pii: S2215-0366(21)00082-1
doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00082-1
pmc: PMC8139871
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
512-520Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.
Références
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2011 Jul;12(3):115-26
pubmed: 21511686
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2013 May-Aug;36(3-4):293-303
pubmed: 23642339
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Jun 1;30(11):970-4
pubmed: 23230909
BMC Neurol. 2014 Jan 06;14:2
pubmed: 24386897
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014 Dec;29(8):767-75
pubmed: 25352087
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;32(4):342-347
pubmed: 30855296
J Rehabil Med. 2004 Feb;(43 Suppl):28-60
pubmed: 15083870
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004 Mar;19(2):203-14
pubmed: 15010086
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Feb 15;34(4):876-880
pubmed: 27312572
J Correct Health Care. 2010 Apr;16(2):147-59
pubmed: 20339132
Exp Neurol. 2019 Jul;317:206-213
pubmed: 30853388
Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Sep 1;89(9):689-94
pubmed: 21897490
Psychol Assess. 2000 Jun;12(2):210-24
pubmed: 10887767
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;5(10):836-844
pubmed: 29496587
Brain Inj. 2011;25(1):74-82
pubmed: 21117913
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Pediatrics. 2011 Jun;127(6):1074-9
pubmed: 21624875
Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;127:3-13
pubmed: 25702206
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0210427
pubmed: 30653552
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Feb;4(2):151-162
pubmed: 31956016
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):279-91
pubmed: 19625867
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Oct 26;11:195
pubmed: 29123473
Brain Inj. 2016;30(10):1161-80
pubmed: 27484194
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1996;11(4):329-38
pubmed: 14588937
Brain Inj. 2016;30(7):839-54
pubmed: 27088426
J Correct Health Care. 2014 Oct;20(4):271-9
pubmed: 25033995
Neurosurgery. 2005 Oct;57(4):719-26; discussion 719-26
pubmed: 16239884
Am J Public Health. 2010 Mar;100(3):476-82
pubmed: 19696388
Brain Inj. 2019;33(13-14):1581-1591
pubmed: 31456433
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1379-1391
pubmed: 26653052