Stratified medicine using invasive coronary function testing in angina: A cost-effectiveness analysis of the British Heart Foundation CorMicA trial.
Cost-effectiveness
INOCA
Stratified medicine
Journal
International journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1874-1754
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8200291
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Aug 2021
15 Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
07
04
2021
revised:
27
04
2021
accepted:
10
05
2021
pubmed:
17
5
2021
medline:
15
7
2021
entrez:
16
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Coronary angiography is indicated in many patients with known or suspected angina for the investigation of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, up to half of patients with symptoms of ischaemia have no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). This large subgroup includes patients with suspected microvascular angina (MVA) and/or vasospastic angina (VSA). Clinical guidelines relating to the management of patients with INOCA are limited. Uncertainty regarding the diagnosis of patients with INOCA presents a health economic challenge, both in terms of healthcare resource utilisation and of quality-of-life impact on patients. A cost-effectiveness analysis of the introduction of stratified medicine into the invasive management of INOCA, based on clinical and resource-use data obtained in the CorMicA trial, from a UK NHS perspective. The intervention included an invasive diagnostic procedure (IDP) of coronary vascular function during coronary angiography to define clinical endotypes to target with linked medical therapy. Outcomes of interest were mean total cost and QALY gain between treatment groups, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. We undertook probabilistic sensitivity and scenario analyses. The incremental cost per QALY gained at 12 months was £4500 (£2937, £33264). Compared with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of £20,000 per QALY, the use of the IDP test is cost-effective. At this WTP threshold there is a 96% probability of the IDP being cost-effective, based on the uncertainty described by bootstrap analysis. The burden of INOCA, particularly in women, is known to be significant. These findings provided new evidence to inform this unmet clinical need.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33992700
pii: S0167-5273(21)00828-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.05.016
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
44-51Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N003403/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : PG/17/25/32884
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : RE/13/5/30177
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : RE/18/6/34217
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest A.B., B.S., R.G., H.E., A.S., M.M.L., S.H., E.Y., R.McD. have no relevant disclosures. C·B. is employed by the University of Glasgow which holds consultancy and research agreements with Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Coroventis, GSK, HeartFlow, Menarini, Neovasc, and Siemens Healthcare. K.G.O. has received consultant and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific. He is employed by Biosensors. S.W. has received consultant and speaker fees from Boston Scientific. P.R. has received consultant and speaker fees from Astra Zeneca. K.R has received educational support from Abbott Vascular and speaker fees from Astra Zeneca. RMT has acted as an advisor for Novartis. MME has a proctoring agreement with Boston Scientific and Vascular Perspectives. T.F. and DC have received speakers fees from Abbott Vascular.