Hydraulically-vulnerable trees survive on deep-water access during droughts in a tropical forest.
deep-water access
drought tolerance
drought-induced mortality
hydraulic vulnerability and safety margins
hydrological droughts
rooting depths
safety-efficiency trade-off
tropical forest
Journal
The New phytologist
ISSN: 1469-8137
Titre abrégé: New Phytol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9882884
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
received:
06
11
2020
accepted:
29
04
2021
pubmed:
17
5
2021
medline:
13
8
2021
entrez:
16
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Deep-water access is arguably the most effective, but under-studied, mechanism that plants employ to survive during drought. Vulnerability to embolism and hydraulic safety margins can predict mortality risk at given levels of dehydration, but deep-water access may delay plant dehydration. Here, we tested the role of deep-water access in enabling survival within a diverse tropical forest community in Panama using a novel data-model approach. We inversely estimated the effective rooting depth (ERD, as the average depth of water extraction), for 29 canopy species by linking diameter growth dynamics (1990-2015) to vapor pressure deficit, water potentials in the whole-soil column, and leaf hydraulic vulnerability curves. We validated ERD estimates against existing isotopic data of potential water-access depths. Across species, deeper ERD was associated with higher maximum stem hydraulic conductivity, greater vulnerability to xylem embolism, narrower safety margins, and lower mortality rates during extreme droughts over 35 years (1981-2015) among evergreen species. Species exposure to water stress declined with deeper ERD indicating that trees compensate for water stress-related mortality risk through deep-water access. The role of deep-water access in mitigating mortality of hydraulically-vulnerable trees has important implications for our predictive understanding of forest dynamics under current and future climates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33993520
doi: 10.1111/nph.17464
pmc: PMC8457149
doi:
Substances chimiques
Water
059QF0KO0R
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1798-1813Informations de copyright
No claim to original US Government works New Phytologist © 2021 New Phytologist Foundation.
Références
Tree Physiol. 2017 Apr 1;37(4):469-480
pubmed: 28338739
New Phytol. 2020 May;226(3):714-726
pubmed: 31630397
J Exp Bot. 2017 Jul 20;68(16):4479-4496
pubmed: 28981777
New Phytol. 2013 May;198(3):957-969
pubmed: 23496172
New Phytol. 2018 Aug;219(3):932-946
pubmed: 29923303
Science. 1999 Jan 22;283(5401):554-7
pubmed: 9915706
New Phytol. 2016 Jan;209(1):123-36
pubmed: 26378984
Ecol Lett. 2019 Jan;22(1):67-77
pubmed: 30402964
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Dec;21(12):4662-72
pubmed: 26179437
Sci Data. 2019 May 17;6(1):63
pubmed: 31101819
Nature. 2015 Mar 5;519(7541):78-82
pubmed: 25739631
New Phytol. 2021 Jul;231(2):601-616
pubmed: 33049084
Plant Cell Environ. 2016 Mar;39(3):618-27
pubmed: 26437327
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 8;106(49):20610-5
pubmed: 19218454
Plant Cell Environ. 2011 Jan;34(1):137-48
pubmed: 20946587
Plant Cell Environ. 2018 Mar;41(3):576-588
pubmed: 29314069
New Phytol. 2011 Jul;191(2):480-495
pubmed: 21477008
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 3;114(40):10572-10577
pubmed: 28923923
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24506
pubmed: 21949723
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 22;115(21):5480-5485
pubmed: 29724857
Nat Plants. 2015 Sep 28;1:15139
pubmed: 27251391
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Feb;21(2):528-49
pubmed: 25258024
New Phytol. 2021 May;230(3):904-923
pubmed: 33570772
New Phytol. 2016 Oct;212(1):80-95
pubmed: 27189787
Environ Exp Bot. 2001 Jun;45(3):239-262
pubmed: 11323032
New Phytol. 2010 Aug;187(3):666-81
pubmed: 20618912
Tree Physiol. 2005 Apr;25(4):457-66
pubmed: 15687094
Ecology. 2010 Dec;91(12):3664-74
pubmed: 21302837
Nat Commun. 2018 Mar 2;9(1):913
pubmed: 29500347
Nature. 2015 Mar 19;519(7543):344-8
pubmed: 25788097
Plant Cell Environ. 2017 Feb;40(2):290-303
pubmed: 27861997
Oecologia. 1999 Nov;121(3):293-301
pubmed: 28308316
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7797):80-87
pubmed: 32132693
New Phytol. 2008;178(4):719-739
pubmed: 18422905
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Oct;20(10):553-60
pubmed: 16701434
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 08;11(7):e0159145
pubmed: 27391489
New Phytol. 2021 Apr;230(2):485-496
pubmed: 33449384
New Phytol. 2019 Jan;221(2):693-705
pubmed: 30144393
New Phytol. 2018 Oct;220(1):132-146
pubmed: 29974958
New Phytol. 2020 Jun;226(6):1550-1566
pubmed: 32064613
New Phytol. 2020 Feb;225(3):1206-1217
pubmed: 31538667
New Phytol. 2015 Jul;207(1):28-33
pubmed: 25816852
New Phytol. 2010 Aug;187(3):631-46
pubmed: 20659252
New Phytol. 2018 Aug;219(3):851-869
pubmed: 29451313
Science. 2008 Jun 13;320(5882):1444-9
pubmed: 18556546
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 16;112(24):7472-7
pubmed: 26034279
Tree Physiol. 2019 Dec 1;39(12):1961-1974
pubmed: 31631220
New Phytol. 2018 Aug;219(3):947-958
pubmed: 28585237
J Vis Exp. 2012 Dec 31;(70):
pubmed: 23299126
New Phytol. 2010 Aug;187(3):647-65
pubmed: 20659253
New Phytol. 2013 Oct;200(2):350-365
pubmed: 23844931
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 11;111(45):16041-6
pubmed: 25349419
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 3;113(18):5024-9
pubmed: 27091965