The effect of glenoid lateralization and glenosphere size in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on deltoid load: A biomechanical cadaveric study.
Acromial head
Clavicular head
Cuff tear arthropathy
Deltoid tension
Glenohumeral arthritis
Glenosphere
Lateralization
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA)
Spinal head
Journal
Journal of orthopaedics
ISSN: 0972-978X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101233220
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
01
12
2020
revised:
04
03
2021
accepted:
20
04
2021
entrez:
17
5
2021
pubmed:
18
5
2021
medline:
18
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Use of a relatively larger glenosphere with some larger overhang helps to minimize posterior impingement and some degree of glenoid lateralization is also beneficial in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The optimal amounts of inferior overhang and lateralization are not agreed upon. The purpose of this in-vitro biomechanical study is to analyze the effect of glenosphere size and glenoid lateralization on deltoid load, focusing on differences in its three distinct heads. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (DeltaXtend, Fa. Depuy/Synthes) was performed on six cadaveric specimens. The load on each head of the deltoid muscle (spinalis, acromialis, and clavicularis) was measured indirectly by transferring deformation (μm/m) via strain gauges (Fa. Vishay) with stepwise lateralization: +0 mm (subgroup I), +5 mm (subgroup II), +10 mm (subgroup III). Each scenario was done with a 38 mm (group A) and a 42 mm (group B) glenosphere. In group A as well in group B, the mean measured deformation in the respective titanium omega increased with lateralization in the clavicular (AI: 119.6 μm/m, AIII: 307.3 μm/m; BI: 173.3 μm/m, BIII: 358.5 μm/m), in the spinal (AI: 85.3 μm/m, AIII: 188.5 μm/m; BI: 138.8 μm/m, BIII 261.2 μm/m) and in the acromial head (AI: 340.5 μm/μ; AIII: 454.2 μm/m; BI: 388.5 μm/m, BIII: 538.8 μm/m). A significant difference between the subgroups in the spinal (p = .048) and clavicular heads (p = .028) was found. The use of a 42 mm glenosphere increased significantly the load in each segment. Lateralization and glenosphere size increased significantly deltoid muscle loading, especially in the clavicular head. According to these in-vitro data, the high variability in the amount of lateralization influences the soft-tissue balance in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Basic science study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33994707
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.04.007
pii: S0972-978X(21)00108-2
pmc: PMC8105180
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
107-111Informations de copyright
© 2021 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Références
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jan;27(1):44-52
pubmed: 28747277
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Mar;22(3):357-64
pubmed: 22608931
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Apr;86(3):388-95
pubmed: 15125127
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Aug;26(8):1441-1447
pubmed: 28372964
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010 Feb;130(2):177-83
pubmed: 19898856
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Dec;26(12):2133-2142
pubmed: 28735842
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Nov;27(11):2099-2107
pubmed: 30340806
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Jul-Aug;18(4):588-95
pubmed: 19481476
Int Orthop. 2019 Oct;43(10):2349-2360
pubmed: 31254018
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jan;20(1):146-57
pubmed: 21134666
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 May-Jun;16(3 Suppl):S71-8
pubmed: 16990021
Am J Physiol. 1997 May;272(5 Pt 2):H2107-14
pubmed: 9176275
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Oct;26(10):1726-1731
pubmed: 28528016
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Sep-Oct;14(5):524-8
pubmed: 16194746
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996 Nov;81(5):2004-12
pubmed: 8941522
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Sep;469(9):2424
pubmed: 21732025
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;14(1 Suppl S):147S-161S
pubmed: 15726075
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Jan;(214):160-4
pubmed: 3791738
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Sep;21(9):1128-35
pubmed: 22036546
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Aug;88(8):1742-7
pubmed: 16882896
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Feb;89(2):233-5
pubmed: 17272434
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Sep;469(9):2469-75
pubmed: 21384212
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jan;26(1):108-117
pubmed: 27374234