Relationship between indexed aortic area and aortic diameter in bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: A retrospective cohort study.
Aneurysm
Aorta
Aortic dissection
Bicuspid aortic valve
Journal
Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)
ISSN: 2049-0801
Titre abrégé: Ann Med Surg (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101616869
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
received:
11
04
2021
accepted:
14
04
2021
entrez:
17
5
2021
pubmed:
18
5
2021
medline:
18
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Aortic dissection is a life-threatening complication of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-associated aortopathy. In these populations, whilst prophylactic replacement of proximal thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) is generally recommended at threshold diameters ≥5.5 cm, dissection may occur in smaller aortas. An alternative size-based parameter, the cross-sectional aortic area/patient height ratio (indexed aortic area, IAA), correlates with increased dissection risk at abnormal values > 10 cm We retrospectively identified 69 patients with BAV-associated TAAs who underwent surgical repair between 2010 and 2016. Aortic diameter was measured on pre-operative imaging, and IAA calculated, at the mid-sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction and mid-ascending aorta for each patient. We determined proportions of aneurysms with IAA >10 cm 50.9%, 12.5% and 64.6% of aneurysms at the sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction and mid-ascending aorta, respectively, had an abnormal IAA. 51.9% and 88.9% of patients with aortic diameter 4.5-5.0 cm and 5.0-5.5 cm, respectively, had an abnormal IAA. In aneurysms with abnormal IAA involving the sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction, and mid-ascending aorta, median aortic diameters were 4.98 cm, 5.04 cm and 5.11 cm, respectively. Overall, 57/72 (79.2%) at-risk aneurysms with IAA >10 cm Significant proportions of BAV-associated TAAs are at increased risk of aortic dissection attending an IAA >10 cm
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Aortic dissection is a life-threatening complication of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-associated aortopathy. In these populations, whilst prophylactic replacement of proximal thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) is generally recommended at threshold diameters ≥5.5 cm, dissection may occur in smaller aortas. An alternative size-based parameter, the cross-sectional aortic area/patient height ratio (indexed aortic area, IAA), correlates with increased dissection risk at abnormal values > 10 cm
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
We retrospectively identified 69 patients with BAV-associated TAAs who underwent surgical repair between 2010 and 2016. Aortic diameter was measured on pre-operative imaging, and IAA calculated, at the mid-sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction and mid-ascending aorta for each patient. We determined proportions of aneurysms with IAA >10 cm
RESULTS
RESULTS
50.9%, 12.5% and 64.6% of aneurysms at the sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction and mid-ascending aorta, respectively, had an abnormal IAA. 51.9% and 88.9% of patients with aortic diameter 4.5-5.0 cm and 5.0-5.5 cm, respectively, had an abnormal IAA. In aneurysms with abnormal IAA involving the sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction, and mid-ascending aorta, median aortic diameters were 4.98 cm, 5.04 cm and 5.11 cm, respectively. Overall, 57/72 (79.2%) at-risk aneurysms with IAA >10 cm
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Significant proportions of BAV-associated TAAs are at increased risk of aortic dissection attending an IAA >10 cm
Identifiants
pubmed: 33996069
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102342
pii: S2049-0801(21)00292-2
pmc: PMC8102153
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
102342Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Références
Circulation. 2016 Nov 29;134(22):1724-1737
pubmed: 27770001
Circulation. 2007 Sep 4;116(10):1120-7
pubmed: 17709637
Cardiol Clin. 2010 May;28(2):289-98
pubmed: 20452544
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 15;370(20):1920-9
pubmed: 24827036
Cardiol Young. 2019 Jan;29(1):1-10
pubmed: 30375310
Circulation. 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266-369
pubmed: 20233780
JAMA. 2008 Sep 17;300(11):1317-25
pubmed: 18799444
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Apr;83(4):1338-44
pubmed: 17383337
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2016 Nov;31(6):585-592
pubmed: 27583373
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Oct 1;54(4):696-701
pubmed: 29554275
Heart. 2000 Jan;83(1):81-5
pubmed: 10618341
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e35-e71
pubmed: 33332149
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:156-165
pubmed: 31704426
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Dec;6(12):1301-10
pubmed: 24269260
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2021 Mar;46(3):100428
pubmed: 31296418
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Apr;109(4):999-1006
pubmed: 31610163
Circulation. 2009 Feb 17;119(6):880-90
pubmed: 19221231
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Feb;123(2):360-1
pubmed: 11828302
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Jun 19;39(12):1890-900
pubmed: 12084585
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jun;10(6):e006249
pubmed: 28592593
Circulation. 2016 Jun 14;133(24):2516-28
pubmed: 27297344
Am J Cardiol. 1993 Feb 1;71(4):322-7
pubmed: 8427176
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Nov;128(5):677-83
pubmed: 15514594
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jan;85(1):362-3
pubmed: 18154858
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Nov;100(5):1666-73; discussion 1673-4
pubmed: 26209494
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Sep;126(3):892-3
pubmed: 14502185
JAMA. 2011 Sep 14;306(10):1104-12
pubmed: 21917581
Heart. 2017 Sep;103(17):1323-1330
pubmed: 28490615
Circulation. 2016 Feb 16;133(7):680-6
pubmed: 26637530
Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 1;35(41):2873-926
pubmed: 25173340
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Sep;146(3):605-10
pubmed: 22982030
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2005 Sep;30(9):470-522
pubmed: 16129122